They are as legitimate as the ones posted here in support of Ukraine.
No, they aren't.
They are as legitimate as the ones posted here in support of Ukraine.
Fair and balanced is what they are. They present news from authentic sources such as the Russian Ministry of Defence.
of course, you're not.Hey I am no Russia supporter.
of course, you're not.
Why would you even question that others may think that you are?
Drink some warm milk, take a nap and get back to us when you come back to your senses.
LOL!! News in the world of ideologues is judged based on the "source" not the information itself. That's how Stalin, for example, dismissed all warnings of the imminent attack by his buddy Adolf as "imperialistic propaganda ".Both are tabloid weekly magazines. Hindustan Times is a newspaper. They present news from authentic, indisputable and honest sources such as the Russian Ministry of Defence.
LOL!! News in the world of ideologues is judged based on the "source" not the information itself. That's how Stalin, for example, dismissed all warnings of the imminent attack by his buddy Adolf as "imperialistic propaganda ".
Nothing is trustworthy unless you can cross check and verify. All intelligence services listen and watch the mainstream media, even those of North Korea because in every lie there usually is a kernel of truth.To be fair you do have to judge based on the source. Otherwise you wouldn't know whether the information is trustworthy or not. The problem is when people argue, that something is inaccurate because they dont like what they hear.
Nothing is trustworthy unless you can cross check and verify. All intelligence services listen and watch the mainstream media, even those of North Korea because in every lie there usually is a kernel of truth.
LOL!! News in the world of ideologues is judged based on the "source" not the information itself. That's how Stalin, for example, dismissed all warnings of the imminent attack by his buddy Adolf as "imperialistic propaganda ".
Gibberish?? I'm not sure, anymore.And in the 'free thinkers' world that's how you end up with Qanon, J6, hydroxychloroquine, LGBTQ attacks, the freedom convoy.....
there is little difficulty in understanding a pro-Russian stance anywhere in India. Ever since independence in 1947, India has had a far better and more consistent relationship with the USSR (and then Russia) than with the West. The West is a complicated entity for India, including the UK, France and Portugal and most importantly the USA after independence. The USA have always leaned towards Pakistan, rather than India. Even though they offered secret support when the Chinese invaded India in 1962, this flipped in the conflicts with Pakistan in 1965 and 1971 (when Bangladesh sought independence from Pakistan with India’s help). The US sabre-rattling in 1971, when the Sixth Fleet sailed towards the conflict, has not been forgotten in India. Nor has the fact that the USSR provided staunch support throughout the conflict, including the use of their veto in the UN Security Council.
As such, it is entirely unremarkable for the favour to be returned now with a stance sympathetic to the Russian cause.
![]()
I follow the Ukraine War. One source, "The Hindustan Times", consistently takes, "a pro-Russian" stance, such as publishing great Russian...
Answer (1 of 19): it simply means that "The Hindustan Times" supports russian aggression. They support ruthless killers who devastate Ukrainian territory, kill thousands of people. How can it be in the 21st century? One country invades the other and there are people who support it???? Russian mil...www.quora.com
there is little difficulty in understanding a pro-Russian stance anywhere in India. Ever since independence in 1947, India has had a far better and more consistent relationship with the USSR (and then Russia) than with the West. The West is a complicated entity for India, including the UK, France and Portugal and most importantly the USA after independence. The USA have always leaned towards Pakistan, rather than India. Even though they offered secret support when the Chinese invaded India in 1962, this flipped in the conflicts with Pakistan in 1965 and 1971 (when Bangladesh sought independence from Pakistan with India’s help). The US sabre-rattling in 1971, when the Sixth Fleet sailed towards the conflict, has not been forgotten in India. Nor has the fact that the USSR provided staunch support throughout the conflict, including the use of their veto in the UN Security Council.
As such, it is entirely unremarkable for the favour to be returned now with a stance sympathetic to the Russian cause.
![]()
I follow the Ukraine War. One source, "The Hindustan Times", consistently takes, "a pro-Russian" stance, such as publishing great Russian...
Answer (1 of 19): it simply means that "The Hindustan Times" supports russian aggression. They support ruthless killers who devastate Ukrainian territory, kill thousands of people. How can it be in the 21st century? One country invades the other and there are people who support it???? Russian mil...www.quora.com
hope they will choke on oil that tastes like bloodSeems Indias foreign minister says more or less the same thing:
![]()
Russia supported India when the West preferred a military dictatorship next to us
#shorts #shortsvideo #latestnews In response to an Australian reporter on India’s cordial relations with RussiaEAM S Jaishankar said; Russia supported India...www.youtube.com
hope they will choke on oil that tastes like blood