Turley: America's Blackout On Biden Corruption Is Truly 'Pulitzer-Level Stuff'
- Thread starter Addict2sex
- Start date
Of course I would, if that opened the door for me to the higher higher. A small sacrifice for potential large reward AND cover.
Was he a known crackhead at the time of his appointment? I'm pretty sure it wasn't. He went off the deep end after that, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't common knowledge at the time. But continue with the revisionist history or what we knew or didn't know back then. Besides the 1988 arrest, Hunter apparently has had no trouble with the law...
And again, no evidence or facts to show that this ever happened. Did Burisma know (or should have known) Biden had a substance abuse problem? Hard to say. We know that Hunter's heavy drug use started after he was on the board. He might have been a functional addict back then, or not totally hooked at that point (or was using other substances). We don't know.
ROTFLMFAO!!!! Hunter's presence on the board IS the proof.
Proof that he could open doors? Sure. Proof that he was a crackhead back then...not so much...
Yes, he had been in and out if rehab repeatedly. Self admitted by him. Are you going to say the board didn't do due diligence now before hiring?
Absolutely. If that crackhead was the son of a prominent person or had some snob value. I run a merchant bank in London and the dimwitted, cokehead son of Lord Fuckerby-Scroatbottom is willing to be on the board and his dad is a polo buddy of the second cousin of Prince William's best friend's aunt. Yup, that fucked-up powder-sniffer's gonna get his own gold-embossed pen and pencil set engraved "director" and he's gonna be showing up for his coke and blowjob payoff twice a month in his best business suit.
So what exactly do directors really do anyway, Buddy? Except get paid for having their names on the corporation's website?.... Answer: fuck-all nothing. It's a sinecure.
And that's exactly why Biden didn't follow recent precedent and hire him to the White House.
Still waiting for that Pulitzer level reporting on this impacting government policy in any way.
Awaiting the release of who bought his art now. Comes up in June. If its found donors bought art who also got contracts, well won't that be interesting.
Butler doesn't need "proof", that would only get in the way.
It could have happened the way Butler describes it, therefore it did.
Why that version and not another version that could have happened?
Because that version is the one that fits Butler's worldview and belief about what is going on.
All of Butler's positions on all topics are this.
It's all vibes.
Last edited:
Proof is only required whn it comes to the deeds or misdeeds of the stable genius and then to a standard which would be almost impossible to meet. Even when judges and juries make findings after actually hearing all of the evidence the regulars just dismiss the judges and juries as corrupt or partisan or whatever. The net effect is that the only twice impeached, now indicted and sexual abuser so found can do no wrong.
I don't think proof is needed there, either.
Proof is irrelevant.
The narrative that Butler likes is the true one.
That's it.
It's all vibes.
