Tucker Carlson
- Thread starter danmand
- Start date
Oh, no!!!! They discovered that Tucker is no fan of Trump. See? That's the problem when you comment without examining the primary source. Anyone who watches Tucker knows that he is no fan of Trump. But, thanks for the heads up. ROTFLMFAO !!
Surely, you people understand the concept of using the tool that works- in the absence of the perfect tool? Trump's agenda is the post neocon agenda. It's that simple.Spin young man SPIN!!!!'
According to Tucker's own lawyers in court, his "reputation" and the "tenor" of his show make it obvious he's not stating facts.
He literally went to court and admitted his show is not real and the things he says are not true. Why anyone still believes this guy is beyond me.
He literally went to court and admitted his show is not real and the things he says are not true. Why anyone still believes this guy is beyond me.
You're admitting that Fox isn't news, its propaganda to drive the post neocon agenda?
Really??? You're going to say that while supporting the cadaver in the White House? You work with what you got, not with what you wish you had. It's called pragmatism.
Its the 'work' part that I'm concerned with.
You admitted that the 'work' of Fox isn't news, its pushing a post neocon, right wing agenda.
Which means any time you are posting tucker or any Fox story here you are admittedly pushing what you know to be propaganda.
I can honestly say that a news organization worth its salt is not. But, I can name a number of them that are. Now, I'll argue Fox News doesn't give a fuck, because they make so much money off carriage fees that they can afford to have major advertisers fuck off. However....that could change. There is a movement by the cabel/satellite providers to cut the amount they pay for Fox to that of CNN or MSNBC. If that happens, well, then we'll see Fox change its coverage faster than Tucker Carlson getting his panties in a twist over non-sexy M&Ms....
If Kevin really cared about transparency, why did he only give the 44,000 hours of footage exclusively to Tucker? I mean, yeah, that's a lot of video. I'm sure you could weave a tale that nothing happened by ignoring certain cameras for several minutes or hours...
I mean, let's face facts. Yes, there were more people outside the capital than stormed it. However, that doesn't mean the people who stormed the capital were not violent....because they sure as fuck were...
Every news agency has a bias. That bias is reflected in the stories they give more air time to. But they are bound by certain laws of journalistic integrity and cite sources which is why the issue retractions and apologies when they get something wrong.
Tucker and most Fox hosts aren't bound by those rules because they've gone to court and said no reasonable person would think what they say are facts. Same tactic used by several Republicans have been taken to task over their claim there was widespread elections fraud and Trump actually won.
In other words, having a bias is very different from straight up lying and saying the stuff coming out of your mouth is so absurd no reasonable person would think you're stating facts.
The "cadaver" has done more in 2 years than Butterball Don has accomplished in 4 years. The only thing Butterball almost succeeded in doing is creating a civil war. Yet you stand by Fox Fake News and Butterball Don like a bee on honey.
Serious question, before all the texts and the Murdoch testimony, did you actually believe what Tucker, Hannity, Ingram, and Maria were telling you every day?
Tucker or Hannity or Maddow etc. are in exactly the same business. They get paid for offering their personal opinions. Anyone who doesn't recognize that is a fucking moron.
Err, but Tuckey's emails tend to suggest that he has a pretty intense loathing of the Orange Dotard. Not just a few doctrinal differences. And that these deep feelings of resentment, hatred, loathing and repressed sexual desire were never enunciated on Tuck's tv show..... which is pretty dishonest, right?
That applies to the right wingers who post Fox crap here, I assume?
