Actaully he WAS sentenced "to hang by the neck until you are dead" but that later was reduced to life imprisonment.
Because of the death sentence at the age of 14, his case likely garnered much more attention which created the outcry which, in turn, eventually resulted in this week's decision.
I think the main reason why the acquittal took so so long is because they had to wait until all the original police investigators and prosecutors were dead so as not to embarrass them. Better that an innocent man wither in prison than embarrass the people who wrongly put him there.
I think the main reason why the acquittal took so so long is because they had to wait until all the original police investigators and prosecutors were dead so as not to embarrass them. Better that an innocent man wither in prison than embarrass the people who wrongly put him there.
One, he wasn't withering in prison. He served 10 years in prison before parole. He was out of prison by 1969.
Two, the main reason the acquittal took so long was that the science used to convict him was still considered to be correct until about 10 years ago. Even given the inconsistent statements of witnesses which may have been suppressed by the police, without the turnaround on the stomach contents analysis Truscott's conviction would still be in place.
While I would agree that police and prosecutors may be generally motivated in the way you suggest, I don't think these motivations have much to do with the Truscott case.