What has Trump got to do with people breaking the law? didn't they arrest the people that broke the law and release those who didn't?
Trump on Joe Rogan
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
Nope, not even close for me. Again, a lot of clips about people talking about the interview.
First, I still think it's possible there is a business reason based on Google's terms with sharing Spotify clips. Do they make more money from people watching the post-interview analysis?
Second, maybe Google knows you are a liberal when you search so they're like "WTH this guy won't be voting for Trump".
What is it with Canadians and the word ironic?Now wouldn't that be ironic?
That isn't how these kinds of search algorithms work, though. (Type "r" and get the latest most popular you tube video that has an r in it.)
Again, it is the first thing I found using all kinds of combinations.
Hinchcliffe's a raunchy, vulgar roast comedian and allegedly a top writer for the roasts. I found him funny on the Tom Brady roast.
However, Nikki Glaser was the highlight of the Brady roast. She's too smart and getting too hot to risk alienating part of her audience by performing at a political rally.
That's what you search for usually on YouTube. Conspiracy opinion shows.Nope, not even close for me. Again, a lot of clips about people talking about the interview.
First, I still think it's possible there is a business reason based on Google's terms with sharing Spotify clips. Do they make more money from people watching the post-interview analysis?
Second, maybe Google knows you are a liberal when you search so they're like "WTH this guy won't be voting for Trump".
So it shows you what you might possibly like and you still complain.
Can't win.
I'm not sure I know what you're trying to say.
I'm just telling you what my experience is with YouTube. Anyways, YouTube has a lot of commentators both liberal and conservative discussing the Rogan-Trump interview as well as every election news event. That's what comes up in my YT search.
Last edited:
You have to understand the thinking.
- The most obvious issue was probably going to be scheduling.
- Harris's team says it is scheduling.
- Rogan says it is scheduling.
Therefore, it is actually a conspiracy where she is using scheduling to cover up how afraid she is to go on the show.
See?
All perfectly coherent reasoning.
In general, I agree with you. I don't think a Presidential candidate necessarily needs to fly to Austin to pay their respects to Joe Rogan.
I do however think you are painting a too narrow stereotype of Rogan's audience. If she has a problem with young, black male (and hispanic male) voters, Rogan might be a good venue. Having the Obama's lecture black males might have limited impact.
Last edited:
No.
They've been systematically going through cases for years now.
Not everyone has been arrested, from what I understand and of course everyone arrested wasn't charged and everyone charged wasn't arrested.
All quite normal.
As for what Trump had to do with it, that's still part of his trial, now isn't it?
Sure part of trial but have you seen the video without the editing and the edited one? You can share your input on it once you see both.
I do suspect short clips are easier to monetize.Nope, not even close for me. Again, a lot of clips about people talking about the interview.
First, I still think it's possible there is a business reason based on Google's terms with sharing Spotify clips. Do they make more money from people watching the post-interview analysis?
Second, maybe Google knows you are a liberal when you search so they're like "WTH this guy won't be voting for Trump".
But it is also worth remembering that algorithms are weighted by a LOT of factors and the machine learning in place is pretty broad.
The context resulting in someone no longer getting the same results is unsurprising.
The easiest thing to do to check would be to search in incognito mode in a new browser or different device and see if it shows up there.
If it vanished from incognito I would be more inclined to believe it is being deliberately targeted.
From one of the horses' mouth, take his perspective on Harris' effort to do his show for what its worth.
"Their job is to win this fuckin' election. If they can win this election by finding some lady who says Trump fingered her in the 80s, then roll her out. Roll her out!!"
My indifference stems from the hyperbole that the last three USA elections democracy is on the line. It wasn't. That USA policy would drastically change. It didn't.
We see some pendulum swings. But society and change operate on their own inertia and not the whims of politics.
And getting worked up about things I cannot change seems to be an exercise in futility. Instead I enjoy trying to understand things, and remain hopeful for better things, and express my opinion as I want.
Just like you are not any more important to the process, also continue to live a comfortable life, and the last eight years didn't affect you at all.
We are all quite devoted to Alanis Morrisette.....our ironic queen.
