Trudeau's New Cabinet

[Darts]

Watching the swearing in of Trudeau's new cabinet. So many changes it is hard to keep track.

One of the major challenges of cabinet making is to try to ensure that the faces of the Ministers look like the faces of the general population of Canada.
Trudeau overhauls his cabinet, drops 7 ministers and shuffles most portfolios | CBC News

 

[Jubee]

Saw this the other day
I love the look on his face, they should do this with every politician lol

TikTok - Make Your Day

 

[richaceg]

Saw this the other day

TikTok - Make Your Day

IMO JT handled it well....that guy was an idiot.

 

[Jubee]

IMO JT handled it well....that guy was an idiot.

The guy thinks the same of JT

 

[oil&gas]

One of the major challenges of cabinet making is to try to ensure that the faces of the Ministers look like the faces of the general population of Canada.

Diversity and inclusion trump qualifications and merits.

 

[Jubee]

He'd be wrong. And the guy would still be the idiot lol.

To you he's wrong, to plenty of others he's right, read the comments. lol

 

[mitchell76]

I'm glad they got rid of Mendocino, as a cabinet member. Marco handled the Bernardo situation, horribly!!

 

[The Oracle]

To you he's wrong, to plenty of others he's right, read the comments. lol

The comments were all supportive......This was a master stroke by the uploader,lol.

Of course mister virtue signaller sees an Asian guy and figures he'll get right in there...Huge fail.

This whole cabinet reshuffle just reeks of desperation......He's going down and he knows it.

 

[RZG]

Reassigning the incompetent, and letting others escape accountability. Blair in charge of defence and over watch on the military...at least there`s not much left for him to fuck up.

 

[The Oracle]

Reassigning the incompetent, and letting others escape accountability. Blair in charge of defence and over watch on the military...at least there`s not much left for him to fuck up.

Blair will try to take their guns away you watch....

 

[The Oracle]

That grinds your gears, don't it?

Hiring people to gain social activism credit should bother everybody......He can't help making the same mistake over and over again.

 

[The Oracle]

So are you claiming to know who to hire for the respective positions and are you also insinuating that the people appointed to their posts are there only because of their skin colour? Because that would be racist.

No that would be the Liberal agenda....You know equality of outcome and all that B.S.

 

[Anbarandy]

So are you claiming to know who to hire for the respective positions and are you also insinuating that the people appointed to their posts are there only because of their skin colour? Because that would be racist.

Thats why am asking are you insinuating that they are there only because of their skin colour and not because of their qualifications. If so, how do you know that they are not qualified?

If posting history is a predicate of the above, then the answer is quite simple.

 

[richaceg]

The comments were all supportive......This was a master stroke by the uploader,lol.

Of course mister virtue signaller sees an Asian guy and figures he'll get right in there...Huge fail.

This whole cabinet reshuffle just reeks of desperation......He's going down and he knows it.

I don't know what this new line of cabinet members can do to lift up JTs dwindling stats. But I wouldn't count them out just yet....one of the saving grace to the Libs is that the Cons aren't any better. Peepee is virtually still unknkown without a lengthy rap sheet to brag about...If they can't sell Peepee to the centrist in order to swing the votes. we might still see JT for another term...

 

[NotADcotor]

Thats why am asking are you insinuating that they are there only because of their skin colour and not because of their qualifications. If so, how do you know that they are not qualified?

I don't think anyone is questioning if they are qualified, it is more a matter of if they are the best for the job.
When you are picking on the basis of race, gender, preferred use of gender fluids etc, you are no longer picking on the basis of who is best.

OTOH the civil servants and the party big wigs pretty much do all the actual work anyway and even before wokeness they would be picked on other non merit basis like geographic location, favours owed for support during the PM run, how much pea soup they have etc. Politics. So it is not a good thing, but it is nothing new and they all do it.

Now if we had a prime minister picked via a farcical aquatic ceremony, we would get the best and the brightest.
I mean if she was lying in a pond and tossed a scimitar at someone, things would be much better if we let that person rule.

 

[NotADcotor]

Thats why am asking are you insinuating that they are there only because of their skin colour and not because of their qualifications. If so, how do you know that they are not qualified?

I don't think anyone is questioning if they are qualified, it is more a matter of if they are the best for the job.
When you are picking on the basis of race, gender, preferred use of gender fluids etc, you are no longer picking on the basis of who is best.

OTOH the civil servants and the party big wigs pretty much do all the actual work anyway and even before wokeness they would be picked on other non merit basis like geographic location, favours owed for support during the PM run, how much pea soup they have etc. Politics. So it is not a good thing, but it is nothing new and they all do it.

Now if we had a prime minister picked via a farcical aquatic ceremony, we would get the best and the brightest.
I mean if she was lying in a pond and tossed a scimitar at someone, things would be much better if we let that person rule.

Granted she would probably not sign up because she identifies as gender fluids.
There is always Kate Micucci, Aubrey Plaza that new Wednesday chick...

 

[richaceg]

That is what being qualified for the job means, that they are the best for a job. Ensuring diversity in your workforce, does not mean they are not qualified. Those are not mutually exclusive traits.

If they're the best for a job, Why are they "reshuffling"?

 

[tml]

Hiring people to gain social activism credit should bother everybody......He can't help making the same mistake over and over again.

I'm just curious, if you were the PM and had members of the electorate who are women and minorities asking why they are not represented in the cabinet, what would you say to them? I'm not being facetious, I believe it's an actual dilema politicians face. If you had a cabinet of 20 politicians and you chose all white males, would you tell women and minority members of the voting public that you didn't feel any politician who was a female or minority was capable of doing the job?

 

[richaceg]

They could reshuffle for any reason political or administrative. There are multiple qualified people at any time for a single position.

So they didn't perform their best on their assignments? otherwise there won't be any change up, yes?

 

[Indiana]