Transmission problem

donotgetset

A gentleman
Jan 5, 2003
83
0
0
Waterloo
I am just having a question and would like an answer.

When a car runs into a trainsmission problem, is it cheaper to fix a standard or an automatic? Also, assuming we have 2 brand new cars, one auto and one standard, which transmission is easier to run into a problem (assuming the driver of the standard and the auto are both good drivers)
 
Automatics can be a bitch.
 
Ok??

If all things are equal and proper maintenance for both. The only thing is the clutch for the manual tranny will have to be replaced sooner or later. But the auto could give you trouble free operation like endless love. :) The auto must have fluid change a couple times but the standard once should do it.

Cost to fix is a too open ended question. Standard tranny repairs are sepcific problems, auto transmission are most of the time are overhauls.

My two cents
 
Transmission

donotgetset said:
I am just having a question and would like an answer.

When a car runs into a trainsmission problem, is it cheaper to fix a standard or an automatic? Also, assuming we have 2 brand new cars, one auto and one standard, which transmission is easier to run into a problem (assuming the driver of the standard and the auto are both good drivers)

As a rule it is more expensive to repair an automatic transmission. However, under normal driving conditions, they very seldom fail.
I have always prefered manual transmissions, but a lot of drivers mishandle them, i.e. "riding the clutch", or "popping the clutch". This can result in having to replace the clutch, and sometimes the flywheel, which can also become expensive depending on the make of the car.
 
Well...

donotgetset said:
I am just having a question and would like an answer.

When a car runs into a trainsmission problem, is it cheaper to fix a standard or an automatic? Also, assuming we have 2 brand new cars, one auto and one standard, which transmission is easier to run into a problem (assuming the driver of the standard and the auto are both good drivers)


...that somewhat depends on your perspective, and what you mean by "problem".

if there is indeed a "problem"...meaning something has occurred that both not routine and renders the car inoperable, the auto is going to be more expensive to fix.

Manual transmissions are pretty straight forward devices, as these things go. Truth be told, there isn't a whole lot to break, unless the tranny is being abused.

Autos are VERY complex devices, and when something goes wrong, it is usually a big, big deal.

This is the thing though....

Things seldom go wrong with modern automatic transmissions. Yes, yes, there was the Chrysler minivan problem a few years back, but that was truly an exception. Plus, the recall covered the repair costs (and yes, if you had to fix it BEFORE the recall came out, but AFTER your warranty had expired you were screwed, but how many people would that have been?).

With manual transmissions however, minor things "go wrong" all the time. Clutches have to be adjusted...and eventually replaced. Beyond that, a manual transmission is VERY MUCH subject to the whims of the person driving the car...menaing that if the driver is very agressive (or has no idea what they are doing), you could burn through a clutch in short order...and repeat a few times in the course of a few years.

In 20 years of car ownership I have NEVER had a problem with an automatic transmission. Never. Change the fluid, change the filter, don't abuse the car, and your automatic should run until the car stops running for some other reason. On the other hand, in that 20 year period I have had...1...2...3...4 sticks. 3 of the 4 eventually need clutch work.

Sticks are more fun to drive, and depending on the type of car, I'd definately get one. But if we are just talking about the family truckster here, get the auto...
 
Yeah...

raydeon said:
As a rule it is more expensive to repair an automatic transmission. However, under normal driving conditions, they very seldom fail.
I have always prefered manual transmissions, but a lot of drivers mishandle them, i.e. "riding the clutch", or "popping the clutch". This can result in having to replace the clutch, and sometimes the flywheel, which can also become expensive depending on the make of the car.

...what he said.
 
the standard is never to automatically fix the automatic in the standard way automatically. if you follow the standard automatically, standards might mean the automatic will not automatically meet standards, or worse the standard could become standardized automatically into a standard automatic standard
 
I don't know about you guys who say Automatics seldomly break down.

Drive by a Mr. Transmission. They break down all the time.

It's unusual before 120k, but after that, anything can happen.

My friend's 97 Grand Prix needed to have its auto tranny rebuilt 2 years ago.

My old Buick, the transmission was definitely on its way out (hard shifts in higher gears, whining, slipping.

Standards can go too. Synchros go, bushings go, gears can break.

Anything can happen.
 
check_mate said:
the standard is never to automatically fix the automatic in the standard way automatically. if you follow the standard automatically, standards might mean the automatic will not automatically meet standards, or worse the standard could become standardized automatically into a standard automatic standard

Who writes your material, Chretien's old speech writer?
 
Winston said:
In an automatic, change the fluid and filter when recommended. Getting contamination is the #1 reason for failure.

Stay the hell away from Ammco repair shops, trust me on this. They will do a decent repair, but the cost, well...

It is often cheaper to have a good mechanic just get a reman tranny and have him re and re.

As for the manual, I had a couple that had the wires break. Its a bitch if you suddenly lose 1st and 2nd. And no matter how hard you try, the clutch will have to be replaced.

Ah, but they use hydraulic clutches now, and the cables never break on the shifter, or do they?....
 
My truck is on its third automatic transmission, 350,000 km, always properly maintained. I have put about 500,000 km on sticks without ever needing any repairs, not to the clutch or anything.
 
shakenbake said:
Ah, but they use hydraulic clutches now, and the cables never break on the shifter, or do they?....

Hydraulic clutches have been around for a looooonnnnnggggg time.

And yes, there are no cables to break, and they never need adjusting.

Though you do have to replace the clutch cylinder, or slave cylinder from time to time.