Tone deaf Liberals: Toronto Protest today

[Not getting younger]

The data comes from here: https://data.oecd.org/price/housing-prices.htm

It shows that the nominal US housing prices are higher than in Canada, but price to income is higher in Canada vs the US. Canada's nominal prices are actually a couple of positions lower than the OECD average.

So, do we have a relative house price problem, or a relative income problem compared to the OECD countries? The house prices might just be settling into where they naturally should be.

Does it account for mortgage and tax eligibility differences?

For illustration only. An American and Canadian that both have the same incomes, buy a house worth the same.

The American can have a term and amortization of 15 years whereas the Canadian 25 and 5 year terms.

Does it factor in the American can write the interest payments off? And with respect to incomes and disposable income. Are there variables there, that are or aren’t accounted for.
Not sure if it doesn’t or not. Don’t have the time. But a fast skim didn’t suggest they did.

 

[Frankfooter]

You mentioned Styles...I didn't.
Now you're saying I'm changing the subject?
hahahaha that's funny.

You support a leader who doesn't support Palestine.

If it was someone you didn't like you would be having a stroke. Now you're praising her and are diluting your beliefs just so you can argue.

This is fun watching you unravel within your own hypocrisy. Are you really that desperate? Or just confused?

Stiles called for a ceasefire, skooby.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743776032715309493

You back the most corrupt politician in Canada and whine endlessly about how unfair it is to talk about his corruption.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769476925108461662

 

[Skoob]

Stiles called for a ceasefire, skooby.

Yeah sure...damage control. Why don't they invite Jama back? Too soon? Lol!

You're being played.

 

[Frankfooter]

Yeah sure...damage control. Why don't they invite Jama back? Too soon? Lol!

You're being played.

Sure, skoob.

You're the one backing the movement that started in 1980 and caused most of the shit you complain about.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769780200445743338

 

[Not getting younger]

Sure, skoob.

You're the one backing the movement that started in 1980 and caused most of the shit you complain about.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769780200445743338

lmao.
This thread is full of walking talking dead tone deaf liberals. Who always fall back on deflections from the walking dead.

Change the channel. Their shit show has jumped the shark…

 

[Skoob]

Sure, skoob.

You're the one backing the movement that started in 1980 and caused most of the shit you complain about.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769780200445743338

How desperate do you need to be to go back almost 1/2 century and use a twitter meme?

Pretty desperate as it would appear.

You should run along and make a donation to the NDP party you now support even though they don't support Palestine.

 

[Frankfooter]

How desperate do you need to be to go back almost 1/2 century and use a twitter meme?

Pretty desperate as it would appear.

You should run along and make a donation to the NDP party you now support even though they don't support Palestine.

How desperate do you have to be to claim that discussing Reagan and Reagonomics is too far in the past.
That is the policy you back.

 

[Skoob]

How desperate do you have to be to claim that discussing Reagan and Reagonomics is too far in the past.
That is the policy you back.

Now you're distracting to Reagan a 1/2 century ago in a thread about Trudeau.
Do you realize how intellectually lost you are?

 

[Frankfooter]

Now you're distracting to Reagan a 1/2 century ago in a thread about Trudeau.
Do you realize how intellectually lost you are?

Its so pathetic when you try to declare anything that proves you wrong is off topic.
You are like some pouty 4 year old who just learned the word 'distracting'.

 

[Not getting younger]

Its so pathetic when you try to declare anything that proves you wrong is off topic.
You are like some pouty 4 year old who just learned the word 'distracting'.

Hey FFs.
So things went to shit around 1980, you say. You are aware we live in Canada right?

Who was in power from 1968 to 1984?
Like father like son. The grand daddy of debt PET!!!!!!
WTF!!!! FFS FFs!

And fact of the matter is. The only thing you’re good at is deflecting. Any single thread that doesn’t go the way you like or is critical of the left. That’s all the team left. does. ..Even the thread about what wrong with the left these days. They’ve lost the plot and are tone deaf.

 

[Skoob]

Its so pathetic when you try to declare anything that proves you wrong is off topic.
You are like some pouty 4 year old who just learned the word 'distracting'.

And the distraction starts again.

Let's play a game...

I prove you wrong in an argument and the farther back in history I can make you go to distract, the more points I get (1 point per decade).
Reagan is about 35 years ago so that's 3.5 points.

So I'm up 3.5 - 0 so far.

 

[Frankfooter]

Hey FFs.
So things went to shit around 1980, you say. You are aware we live in Canada right?

Who was in power from 1968 to 1984?
Like father like son. The grand daddy of debt PET!!!!!!
WTF!!!! FFS FFs!

And fact of the matter is. The only thing you’re good at is deflecting. Any single thread that doesn’t go the way you like or is critical of the left. That’s all the team left. does. ..Even the thread about what wrong with the left these days. They’ve lost the plot and are tone deaf.

You don't even know where and when the right wing economic policies you back started, do you?
For someone who claims to know finance you've probably backed the Chicago school of economics without even knowing what it is.

Kind of like your whining about declining environment without knowing about the sixth great extinction and while denying climate change.

 

[Not getting younger]

You don't even know where and when the right wing economic policies you back started, do you?
For someone who claims to know finance you've probably backed the Chicago school of economics without even knowing what it is.

Kind of like your whining about declining environment without knowing about the sixth great extinction and while denying climate change.

deflection from yet another huge self inflicted faceplant.
PET
Rae…Harris and Chretien in the 1990s
McWynne …Drummond and Ford in 2011-2024
416/905, Prov train wrecks
JT 2016-2014……

What do they all have in common fool. FFs!

Can we hope for just ONE dim bulb.

 

[Frankfooter]

deflection from yet another huge self inflicted faceplant.
PET
Rae…Harris and Chretien in the 1990s
McWynne …Drummond and Ford in 2011-2024
416/905, Prov train wrecks
JT 2016-2014……

What do they all have in common fool. FFs!

in common?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769723212567319027

 

[Not getting younger]

in common?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769723212567319027

Twit er comic books after falling face first into a deep hole.
shocker

 

[Skoob]

Twit er comic books after falling face first into a deep hole.
shocker

If it wasn't for X, FF wouldn't know anything about the real world! Lol!

He also thinks anyone wealthy is either just lucky or a criminal or both. That's what underachievers say to convince themselves their failure is someone else's fault.
Their solution is to take money from others and expect that and more, in perpetuity, to pad their lifestyles.
It's quite sad really.

 

[Frankfooter]

If it wasn't for X, FF wouldn't know anything about the real world! Lol!

He also thinks anyone wealthy is either just lucky or a criminal or both. That's what underachievers say to convince themselves their failure is someone else's fault.
Their solution is to take money from others and expect that and more, in perpetuity, to pad their lifestyles.
It's quite sad really.

The difference is I don't bend over and lube myself up for elites like rump to steal my money.
Not all rich are crooks, but the ones you back seem to be.

Are you hoping they'll give you some of what they steal from poor people?
You think rump would even let you in Mar A Logo?

 

[wigglee]

It's not about what PP would do...it's about what JT is doing. He's the one running the country right?

It's not about fundraising...it's about lecturing on affordability while people who can afford $1700 plates attend. Tone deaf.

I don't expect smug Liberals to understand that.

because Cons never hold these fundraising dinners? What planet are you from?

 

[Not getting younger]

because Cons never hold these fundraising dinners? What planet are you from?

When you can point to.

1) PP and cons wearing $3,000 suits, $1,000 shoes, $10,000 watches, and charging $1,700 for a bite and to lecture and virtue signal about life getting hard for the

/stutters like JT

PeePee..Peeons

2) Telling an indigenous person they and you ( lefties) virtue signal so loudly about …that’s just begging for drinkable water “thanks for donating”……

or even small municipalities a stones throw away begging for UBI and the time of day for 15 years

3) “we know times are tough, cancel your Disney Channel subscriptions”

You can sit at the table. Until then, sit down and

Thanks for playing

 

[Frankfooter]

because Cons never hold these fundraising dinners? What planet are you from?

Correct, PeePee works for corporate lobbyists, not for Canadians.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1770101374157541642