to the sp and clients. Does your business acitvity decrease because of coronavirus ?
- Thread starter coolmanfever
- Start date
COVID-19 is primarily affecting the elderly may be greatly exaggerated....Not Just Seniors: French Doctors Report 50% Of ICU Patients Under 60 Years Old, Netherlands Under 50
It's beginning to look like someone's lying ( China & and also 'MainstreamMedia ' ) as both French and Dutch medical professionals are reporting that half of coronavirus ICU patients are under the age of 60 and 50-years-old respectively.
"MORE THAN 50% OF THE 300 #COVIDー19 CASES IN CRITICAL CONDITION IN FRANCE ARE UNDER 60," tweeted The Atlantic's Rachel Donadio on Saturday.
Rachel Donadio
@RachelDonadio
CX: FRANCE NOW PUSHING EPIDEMIC LEVEL. All restos, cafés, non-essential stores closed. MORE THAN 50% OF THE 300 #COVIDー19 CASES IN CRITICAL CONDITION IN FRANCE ARE UNDER 60; France has 4,500 cases, which doubled in the past 72 hours, said head of French health service. Replaces:
https://twitter.com/RachelDonadio/s...patients-under-60-years-old-netherlands-under
Meanwhile in the Netherlands, over half are reportedly under 50 years old.
"Today there are between forty and fifty corona patients in critical condition on Dutch intensive care units. “More than half of those patients are under fifty years old. There are also young people. "" That says chairman of the Dutch Association for Intensive Care (NVIC) Diederik Gommers, in an interview with this site." -AD.nl
Steve Lookner
@lookner
https://twitter.com/lookner/status/...patients-under-60-years-old-netherlands-under
21h
Over half of the coronavirus patients in intensive care in the Netherlands are under 50 years old
On Saturday, AD documented the case of a 16-year-old boy with no disclosed underlying conditions who wound up in the ICU after complaining of nausea and headaches. He is currently on ventilation in a medically-induced coma.
https://www.ad.nl/dossier-coronavir...patients-under-60-years-old-netherlands-under
"As long as he can't breathe properly himself, they keep him artificially asleep," said his 24-yaer-old brother Babor.
The reports suggest that COVID-19 is more than just a "boomer remover" - a phrase made popular by younger generations who think they're invincible.
Considering that US hospitals are projected to be completely full come mid-May, the implications of the coronavirus impacting more than just the elderly are significant.
The new reports of younger ICU patients echo unconfirmed accounts from Italian doctors:
In which case, reports that COVID-19 is primarily affecting the elderly may be greatly exaggerated.
It's beginning to look like someone's lying ( China & and also 'MainstreamMedia ' ) as both French and Dutch medical professionals are reporting that half of coronavirus ICU patients are under the age of 60 and 50-years-old respectively.
"MORE THAN 50% OF THE 300 #COVIDー19 CASES IN CRITICAL CONDITION IN FRANCE ARE UNDER 60," tweeted The Atlantic's Rachel Donadio on Saturday.
Rachel Donadio
@RachelDonadio
CX: FRANCE NOW PUSHING EPIDEMIC LEVEL. All restos, cafés, non-essential stores closed. MORE THAN 50% OF THE 300 #COVIDー19 CASES IN CRITICAL CONDITION IN FRANCE ARE UNDER 60; France has 4,500 cases, which doubled in the past 72 hours, said head of French health service. Replaces:
https://twitter.com/RachelDonadio/s...patients-under-60-years-old-netherlands-under
Meanwhile in the Netherlands, over half are reportedly under 50 years old.
"Today there are between forty and fifty corona patients in critical condition on Dutch intensive care units. “More than half of those patients are under fifty years old. There are also young people. "" That says chairman of the Dutch Association for Intensive Care (NVIC) Diederik Gommers, in an interview with this site." -AD.nl
Steve Lookner
@lookner
https://twitter.com/lookner/status/...patients-under-60-years-old-netherlands-under
21h
Over half of the coronavirus patients in intensive care in the Netherlands are under 50 years old
On Saturday, AD documented the case of a 16-year-old boy with no disclosed underlying conditions who wound up in the ICU after complaining of nausea and headaches. He is currently on ventilation in a medically-induced coma.
https://www.ad.nl/dossier-coronavir...patients-under-60-years-old-netherlands-under
"As long as he can't breathe properly himself, they keep him artificially asleep," said his 24-yaer-old brother Babor.
The reports suggest that COVID-19 is more than just a "boomer remover" - a phrase made popular by younger generations who think they're invincible.
Considering that US hospitals are projected to be completely full come mid-May, the implications of the coronavirus impacting more than just the elderly are significant.
The new reports of younger ICU patients echo unconfirmed accounts from Italian doctors:
In which case, reports that COVID-19 is primarily affecting the elderly may be greatly exaggerated.
My RMT asked me if i really wanted my regular session due to hip muscle pain after two bone marrow samples after chemo... i see her every 3-4 weeks... she told me she would see me, but with a depressed immune system, she said can i put up with the pain and see her in a few weeks,,, when a legit provider looks out for you like this... things are getting weird... to say the least
My physiotherapy clinic shut down today.
Also the RLD in Amsterdam is closed!
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-redlig-idUSKBN2120VL
Also the RLD in Amsterdam is closed!
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-netherlands-redlig-idUSKBN2120VL
Wow, maybe instead of STD tests if Covid-19 virus tests ever get to be available to all, perhaps sexworkers and clients needed to be tested every few weeks. Since the virus can pass easily just by hand or touching a surface contact, being intimate doesn't seem to be that much riskier.
I am in the investment business, so doing lots of updates with clients, etc. Last week I was scheduled to go to a sexworker meeting in Austin Tx, which was canceled. I had booked a trip to Montreal, which was canceled. Fortunately, even though I had non cancel airlines and hotels booked, they all issued refunds or with American Airlines credit for the next trip within a year due to the virus.
I am booked for a week in Toronto in about a month, including a retirement meeting for CFPs at the downtown Marriott and then moving to a hotel in Mississauga. I see Ontario has not banned gatherings yet for over 50 or 200, but I am monitoring whether the meeting will be canceled or not. So far, only a few cases in Arizona and few in Toronto, but the next few weeks will be critical.
I am in my 70s but in excellent health with no underlying conditions. I would love to get back to Toronto whether the meeting goes on or not. However, if canceled, I will probably cancel the trip. The problem is if it gets much worse, it may be better to go now, or it may be a long time before its safer as it may get worse in the coming months.
BTW air travel seems relatively safe since the recirculated air goes through medical-grade HEPA filters. So the risk is more limited to someone sitting near you. I am booked on Air Canada, but as always, I get the 3rd window seat from the rear. No reason to be near the front since we will have to wait for baggage. Also, you are less likely to have a middle seat passenger next to you if way in the back. Airplanes usually more forward up or down, so in the event of a crash, I'd rather have the impact mostly in front of me., so often the rear is safer!
On the investment side, I argue buying the dip is historically 100% successful - the time for recovery is the risk. This, of course, is because markets have always returned to all-time highs as they did in the US just a few weeks ago before the plunge. I am thinking of investing a small amount in Air Canada at the next dip - down about 40% from its high seems to have a good business plan. At least the airlines will have huge savings from the oil price war with jet fuel costs plummeting.
Flying from Phoenix to Toronto is, for me, always comparisons between American and Air Canada. Lately, Air Canada, although it has a direct flight at suitable times, has been more expensive than American (although I have almost 100k frequent flier miles on American.) But Air Canada had a 25% discount when I booked, which made it much cheaper than American. However, now I may have to cancel it - but I am anxious to get back to Toronto! Decisions, decisions!
I am in the investment business, so doing lots of updates with clients, etc. Last week I was scheduled to go to a sexworker meeting in Austin Tx, which was canceled. I had booked a trip to Montreal, which was canceled. Fortunately, even though I had non cancel airlines and hotels booked, they all issued refunds or with American Airlines credit for the next trip within a year due to the virus.
I am booked for a week in Toronto in about a month, including a retirement meeting for CFPs at the downtown Marriott and then moving to a hotel in Mississauga. I see Ontario has not banned gatherings yet for over 50 or 200, but I am monitoring whether the meeting will be canceled or not. So far, only a few cases in Arizona and few in Toronto, but the next few weeks will be critical.
I am in my 70s but in excellent health with no underlying conditions. I would love to get back to Toronto whether the meeting goes on or not. However, if canceled, I will probably cancel the trip. The problem is if it gets much worse, it may be better to go now, or it may be a long time before its safer as it may get worse in the coming months.
BTW air travel seems relatively safe since the recirculated air goes through medical-grade HEPA filters. So the risk is more limited to someone sitting near you. I am booked on Air Canada, but as always, I get the 3rd window seat from the rear. No reason to be near the front since we will have to wait for baggage. Also, you are less likely to have a middle seat passenger next to you if way in the back. Airplanes usually more forward up or down, so in the event of a crash, I'd rather have the impact mostly in front of me., so often the rear is safer!
On the investment side, I argue buying the dip is historically 100% successful - the time for recovery is the risk. This, of course, is because markets have always returned to all-time highs as they did in the US just a few weeks ago before the plunge. I am thinking of investing a small amount in Air Canada at the next dip - down about 40% from its high seems to have a good business plan. At least the airlines will have huge savings from the oil price war with jet fuel costs plummeting.
Flying from Phoenix to Toronto is, for me, always comparisons between American and Air Canada. Lately, Air Canada, although it has a direct flight at suitable times, has been more expensive than American (although I have almost 100k frequent flier miles on American.) But Air Canada had a 25% discount when I booked, which made it much cheaper than American. However, now I may have to cancel it - but I am anxious to get back to Toronto! Decisions, decisions!
Big announcement Tomorrow 1pm from the Prime Minister of Canada and also Ontario Premier Doug Ford.
We will have to agree to disagree then. Your take on things implies that every right could be labelled a privilege, which is merely a SPECIAL right afforded to a select group. Within our society driving, texting etc is a right, not a privilege. its of course a right with rules, but so what, that is nothing special.
I am done seeing SPs for the next few months until this thing blows over. Usually see SPs every other week.
It's turning into a fetish now, with pictures showing girls wearing masks :der: https://www.leolist.cc/personals/fe...asian_butt_and_1000_real_pics_or_free-5641012
"★ Lia ★ from Singapore 36DD-24-44 32yrs 158cm 120ibs
Busty & Sexy girl! New Arrived!!!"
Driving is not a privilege, if you can pass the test, it is a RIGHT. ANYONE can drive if they meet the basic criteria. A privilege is something afforded to a FEW. Many people drive.
Therefore it is a right. Not everyone can afford to do all sorts of things, but that doesn't make those things a privilege.
Modern conveniences? At what point does it become NOT a privilege? Is owning a ball point pen a privilege? What about a T shirt made on a modern piece of machinery? What about owning a steel spoon? Is that a privilege? Aluminum foil? A hammer? A spear? a club? Owning something that you have made, or, by extension, traded for, and using it is not a privilege in any normal meaning of the word. sorry, your argument holds no water.
The current use of the word "privileged" by far left SJWs and other far left "annointed" is nothing other than their latest attempt to portray anyone who is successful and not part of their approved "oppressed' list as undeserving of their success and in fact guilty of the sin of non-failure.
"Surpass lazy Canadians" - most aanadians are immigrants at most a few generations removed. Please provide evidence that Canadians are lazy.
I think your understanding of rights vs. privileges is off a tad....
A 'right is inherent, something which exists without permission from any power or authority, such as the right to life.
A privilege is a grant of permission from power/authority to do an act.
When any right, a natural right, is regulated in any manner, regardless of the good intentions of that regulation, the right is no longer a right, it becomes a mere privilege.
Driving is a privilege, not a right.
You display so much privilege in this post and you don't even know it! The privilege of living so well that you don't even need to know the difference between a right and a privilege.
You've lived a superficial existence for your entire life and now covid19 is going to bring you down to size, pal!
Legal rights are not inherent at all - we WANT them to be inherent, if we like them, but they are enshrined in law. Privilege:
a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group.
Running an economy correctly and therefore enjoying a high standard of living is no more a privilege than to say, "Oh wow, you boil your water before you drink it, and I don't, you are so privileged to not get sick".
Basically you are saying that having any standard of living above subsistence implies privilege. I say no, it just means that you have thought out how to do things and you work hard and make intelligent decisions.
If you and I were washed up on identical uninhabited small islands, and you decided to just eat fallen coconuts and sleep under the stars, whereas I built water dams, made fish nets, raised rabbits, made a great house and gradually made my life better and better, I would describe that as intelligence and hard work, not privilege.
