Tit for tat - Is it fair? Am I the asshole?

[KittyCaterina]

Isn't it sexual harassment under the Law tho? Like when you have sex in public or show your private part under your Burberry at the park because no one consent to it basically.

LOL @ under the Burberry trench coat.

 

[KittyCaterina]

Won't work.
These guys get off on this. Sending them a diseased dick back won't do shit if they are straight. It isn't their dick, so who cares if it is diseased, and they aren't turned on by Dick pictures anyway.

What you need to do is send them a pic of something they do typically get turned on by, and then use it against them.
Send them a diseased Pussy pic. The more disgusting the better. That will completely turn them off. And will likely do so for the rest of the day. Every time they get horny, and picture a Pussy, that image will pop into their head and ruin it for them.
HA HA!

Blue Waffle

 

[onomatopoeia]

The best thing to do might be to circulate his contact info, (handle? phone #? I don't do texting), to any/ all industry contacts, and many of them might block this guy before first contact.

 

[xoxbonnieoxo]

This is my usual MO. Block and ignore but I really wish there was a way for them to get their own medicine. I mean I would send the pic and block after anyways so I wouldn’t be dealing with a back and forth. So not worried about that at all.

I think the “kink” will be ruined by a puss-filled shot. I’m talking seriously gross.

Maybe not the right approach but I don’t think ignoring it working either. We women ignore it all the time and they just keep doing it anyways. Civie or pro, we all get them. And men keep doing it because there is no consequence.

This idea that we just have to deal in silence is not sitting well with me as all. At least not this morning. LOL.

It is now a criminal offence to send an unsolicited explicit photo with consequences of monetary fines and/or jail time.

Cyberflashing: Understanding new law that bans sending unwanted nude pictures

Offenders could face up to two years behind bars under the new Online Safety Bill

ca.news.yahoo.com

.

 

[xoxbonnieoxo]

You could say the same of twitter, or whatever means people are sending you dick pics..


So.. publicly is OK, privately is not? Is that the distinction you're making?

I get it that you don't want dick pics. And if someone does that after you explicitly tell them not to, that's a problem.
But conversations with a SP are inherently sexual.. so it's not surprising that they would contain sexual content (including images). That certainly may be undesirable, but I think retaliating for someone DMing you something you don't like (the first time around) is uncalled for and unprofessional.

I don't think you understand the sheer volume of explicit pics we receive each day. We shouldn't have to worry about opening our phones in public or next to someone in private even. Imagine us opening our phones while in the company of a child, or a mother/grandmother, a boss/employee?