The Royal bun is in the Oven!
- Thread starter seth gecko
- Start date
Your right, I won't try because I don't care, your with the rest of the brits holding on to the relics of a former empire - if it makes all of you feel less irrelevant good on ya as the Aussie's would say...And another maroon doesn't know much or doesn't care to know much about the royals. It's been shown numerous times on TERB, that the word parasite just doesn't apply, no matter how many time DM repeats it. Hey, if I'm wrong, show me how they parasites? It's never been successful done before, so I doubt you'll succeed this time or even try.
OTB
Pssst , it's not just the Brits who hold the Royals close. The real reason is that you can't show it just like others couldn't in past threads.Your right, I won't try because I don't care, your with the rest of the brits holding on to the relics of a former empire - if it makes all of you feel less irrelevant good on ya as the Aussie's would say...
OTB
Both words fit you and DM.Don't you mean:
Maroon; A dope, fool, idiot, or nincompoop.
Unbelievably stupid person.
Might have been derived from moron: adding an extra letter "o" to moron meaning double-moron, thus a maroon.
Usually preceded by the words "what a"...
He thought he was eating chocolate ice cream but it was
vanilla with chocolate syrup--what a maroon!
He thought that wax fruit was real--what a maroon!
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=maroon
Oh I understand, the old Brit appendages / dominions also cling to the myth of empire... although it seems the Indians have moved on....Pssst , it's not just the Brits who hold the Royals close. The real reason is that you can't show it just like others couldn't in past threads.
I really don't care - The brits love them, they are a tourist attraction (Britain's answer to Disney) and I'm sure the revenue and spinoff commerce from royal trinkets and other nonsense more than covers the costs of the parasites.... like a profitable toll bridge to nowhere or the lotto
At least they bring a hot chick in every generation - they are so fucking boring and ugly that they need some new blood to dilute that horse face thing the've got going....
OTB
At least the brits adore one of their own parasites. It blows the mind that canadians are unable to find one of their own to put on extravagant welfare.Oh I understand, the old Brit appendages / dominions also cling to the myth of empire... although it seems the Indians have moved on....
I really don't care - The brits love them, they are a tourist attraction (Britain's answer to Disney) and I'm sure the revenue and spinoff commerce from royal trinkets and other nonsense more than covers the costs of the parasites.... like a profitable toll bridge to nowhere or the lotto
At least they bring a hot chick in every generation - they are so fucking boring and ugly that they need some new blood to dilute that horse face thing the've got going....
OTB
That just about sums it up, and your ignorant comments show it. You don't understand shite. Facts be damned.Oh I understand, the old Brit appendages / dominions also cling to the myth of empire... although it seems the Indians have moved on....
I really don't care - The brits love them, they are a tourist attraction (Britain's answer to Disney) and I'm sure the revenue and spinoff commerce from royal trinkets and other nonsense more than covers the costs of the parasites.... like a profitable toll bridge to nowhere or the lotto
At least they bring a hot chick in every generation - they are so fucking boring and ugly that they need some new blood to dilute that horse face thing the've got going....
OTB
Yup, they are so boring and no one cares about them so much so that the last Royal wedding outdrew the Supper Bowl viewership worldwide by a factor of 20. Even 23 million Americans watched the wedding.
You're like an older G&G, only more pale. Well done.At least the brits adore one of their own parasites. It blows the mind that canadians are unable to find one of their own to put on extravagant welfare.
par·a·site
noun
1.
an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment.
2.
a person who receives support, advantage, or the like, from another or others without giving any useful or proper return, as one who lives on the hospitality of others.
3.
(in ancient Greece) a person who received free meals in return for amusing or impudent conversation, flattering remarks, etc.
noun
1.
an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment.
2.
a person who receives support, advantage, or the like, from another or others without giving any useful or proper return, as one who lives on the hospitality of others.
3.
(in ancient Greece) a person who received free meals in return for amusing or impudent conversation, flattering remarks, etc.
Were you and Gryfin separated at birth? None of those definitions fit the Royals, but you keep repeating them.par·a·site
noun
1.
an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment.
2.
a person who receives support, advantage, or the like, from another or others without giving any useful or proper return, as one who lives on the hospitality of others.
3.
(in ancient Greece) a person who received free meals in return for amusing or impudent conversation, flattering remarks, etc.
You poor soul, you must have been severely indoctrinated from birth in order to not see any similarities between the definition and the monarchy. It is a case for the CAS.Were you and Gryfin separated at birth? None of those definitions fit the Royals, but you keep repeating them.
Or at least their money....At least the brits adore one of their own parasites. It blows the mind that canadians are unable to find one of their own to put on extravagant welfare.
OTB
Seemingly somewhere along the line you fell out of the wagon and onto your head. Sad.You poor soul, you must have been severely indoctrinated from birth
For the third or fourth(?) time, all those claims have been dealt with in past threads, showing that it's clearly not the case, and i'm not planning on repeating them, especially for you.You poor soul, you must have been severely indoctrinated from birth in order to not see any similarities between the definition and the monarchy. It is a case for the CAS.
Your right, I really don't care. What facts am I ignoring, I've stipulated that the Royal Family is a profitable tourist attraction and that they are popular - yes, even princess frustrated American women get sucked into a Royal wedding. The lotto is popular and profitable and about as relevant...That just about sums it up, and your ignorant comments show it. You don't understand shite. Facts be damned.
Yup, they are so boring and no one cares about them so much so that the last Royal wedding outdrew the Supper Bowl viewership worldwide by a factor of 20. Even 23 million Americans watched the wedding.
They are damn ugly though, you were smart enough not to argue that point - there must be a horse in the family line somewhere.....
OTB
We all know your beliefs in the monarchy is strong. Nobody want you to repeat your fairytales. In any event, I recommend a fellow monarchist H C Andersen for much better fairytales than yours. The other difference between him and you is than H C was fully aware that they were fairytales.For the third or fourth(?) time, all those claims have been dealt with in past threads, showing that it's clearly not the case, and i'm not planning on repeating them, especially for you.
Oh I understand, the old Brit appendages / dominions also cling to the myth of empire... although it seems the Indians have moved on....
I really don't care - The brits love them, they are a tourist attraction (Britain's answer to Disney) and I'm sure the revenue and spinoff commerce from royal trinkets and other nonsense more than covers the costs of the parasites.... like a profitable toll bridge to nowhere or the lotto
At least they bring a hot chick in every generation - they are so fucking boring and ugly that they need some new blood to dilute that horse face thing the've got going....
OTB
You forgot to also say your called them parasites the first time, an interesting omission, which again the actual facts shows is not the case. Facts like they pay taxes, heads/runs/invests in business, and they have influence/power, not just at home, but on the international stage. That why she has been constantly on 'The Most Influential Leaders/Women' lists for many years. This is not someone who is not just for entertainment..Your right, I really don't care. What facts am I ignoring, I've stipulated that the Royal Family is a profitable tourist attraction and that they are popular - yes, even princess frustrated American women get sucked into a Royal wedding. The lotto is popular and profitable and about as relevant...
They are damn ugly though, you were smart enough not to argue that point - there must be a horse in the family line somewhere.....
OTB
As for the ugly factor, you really are scratching the bottom of the barrel. I'd love to see what you look like when you hit your golden years or is it too late for that.
Oh, that explains everything: They pay tax on what they have stolen from the people. This argument is as valid as you memorable argument that it benefits the country to take two days off for a wedding.You forgot to also say your called them parasites the first time, an interesting omission, which again the actual facts shows is not the case. Facts like they pay taxes, heads/runs/invests in business, and they have influence/power, not just at home, but on the international stage. That why she has been constantly on 'The Most Influential Leaders/Women' lists for many years. This is not someone who is not just for entertainment..
As for the ugly factor, you really are scratching the bottom of the barrel. I'd love to see what you look like when you hit your golden years or is it too late for that.
I am sure OTB will change his views and become a monarchist on the strengths of these arguments. LOL
Stole? As for OTB changing his views, ignorance isn't necessarily bliss, but a frosty day in July comes to mind.Oh, that explains everything: They pay tax on what they have stolen from the people. This argument is as valid as you memorable argument that it benefits the country to take two days off for a wedding.
I am sure OTB will change his views and become a monarchist on the strengths of these arguments. LOL
As far as valid statements are concerned, how's you research on the superiority of the Danish military coming along?
changing the topic?? LOLStole? As for OTB changing his views, ignorance isn't necessarily bliss, but a frosty day in July comes to mind.
As far as valid statements are concerned, how's you research on the superiority of the Danish military coming along?
