The Rebel News Thread

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,850
3,981
113
Dude, if you compare it to Fox's tilt to the right, or even MSNBCs, they are dead centre. That's the reality. I know Fox started right-of-centre and kept going, but CNN's shift to the left is a significantly smaller shift. Also, just because Fox or Trump say CNN is leftist, doesn't make it true.
Dude, a simple Google search on where CNN leans will give you tons of results that say "left" or "lean left". They are not dead centre.
But aside from survey's and analysis, one doesn't have to watch CNN for more than 30 minutes to see how heavily left they are.
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,333
5,435
113
Dude, a simple Google search on where CNN leans will give you tons of results that say "left" or "lean left". They are not dead centre.
But aside from survey's and analysis, one doesn't have to watch CNN for more than 30 minutes to see how heavily left they are.
If you could read, I said compared to Fox or MSNBC's shifts on either side of the spectrum, CNN is centrist. Yes, they lean left. No, they are not heavily to the left, no matter how much the MAGA crowd wants to pretend. Fox is significantly to the right, so much so that they are legitimately the GOP propaganda arm. CNN does not take the Dems talking points and regurgitate them like they are fact. Fox does. Even Fox's news side downplays negative GOP/Trump stories and provides extensive coverage of any bad news regarding the Dems. This is proven fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,333
5,435
113
Anyone that thinks cnn is centre and not bias to left wing nuts is pretty stupid.

View attachment 290010

Here's a story of TDS lunatics jake trapper and Rachel maddow (who's TDS seems to prevents her from even uttering the words Donald Trump) shaping the narrative by deliberately not letting their audience (made up of mostly TDS lunatics also) listen to Donalds Trumps victory speech last night and make up their own minds. Withholding news is faking the news.

I'm shocked that you would think that. But there really is no basis for what you say. As mentioned, they are just left of centre. You can try to spin it, but that is the reality. They didn't cover Trump's speech for several reasons. Most importantly, he didn't really say anything of substance. He regurgitated his list of grievances. He got 50% of the vote, from less than 15% of registered GOPers...What does this tell us? Think about that for a wee bit of time....
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,850
3,981
113
If you could read, I said compared to Fox or MSNBC's shifts on either side of the spectrum, CNN is centrist. Yes, they lean left. No, they are not heavily to the left, no matter how much the MAGA crowd wants to pretend. Fox is significantly to the right, so much so that they are legitimately the GOP propaganda arm. CNN does not take the Dems talking points and regurgitate them like they are fact. Fox does. Even Fox's news side downplays negative GOP/Trump stories and provides extensive coverage of any bad news regarding the Dems. This is proven fact.
Like I said, watch CNN and then tell us how they don't suck Dem cock and look at any & every opportunity to do a Trump/GOP smear piece.
Just watch...don't theorize.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,483
113
As for your belief that the media is in the bag for Trudeau or the Liberals, please provide proof. The CBC has broken several stories that are damaging to the Liberal government (and the PC government before that). The National Post and Sun papers regularly slam him. I've never heard a legit journalist say they were forced to put on the kid gloves when reporting on Trudau/Liberals. As much as you want to pretend it is a conflict of interest, you are so wrong. If, for example, the National Post was told it was getting less $$$ after it broke news on a government's malfeasance. they would have the greatest story ever!
How to say you don't understand conflict of interest without saying you don't understand conflict of interest. LOL!
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,483
113
Look, I understand what was going on. But the reality is our laws have stipulations that saw an army cannot be designated a terror organization. And unfortunately the IRG is part of an army. So, while most mainstream media outlets have reported this, Menzies asks the question for the specific purpose of getting a reaction. Even if he's ignored, he can spin it about Freeland being out of touch or what not. What happened is even better and Ezra Levant's wet dream.
Does the law actually prohibit the designation of a group as terrorist simply because they describe themselves as the armed forces of a nation? Aren't the Liberals the current government of Canada? If there is a legislative issue which prevents designating an armed force, or a group within a armed force as terrorists, can't the government introduce legislation to amend the legislation accordingly? If they don't want to do that, shouldn't they have to explain why? And if it is a legislative issue, why haven't other media outlets asked the government whether they will be addressing the issue?

It seems that you could benefit more than most people by following Menzie's reports, because he is at least asking the right questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,333
5,435
113
How to say you don't understand conflict of interest without saying you don't understand conflict of interest. LOL!
You also don't seem to realize that the media outlets would make a HUGE stink if there were stings attached to that funding. What would happen if one of Trudeau's ministers demanded the National Post not cover something, or soften a take on, say, the carbon tax. Do you think they would willingly go along with it? No. That would be the headline. POLITICAL INTERFERENCE!!!!!

And, I can promise you, if Rebel were able to get that money, Ezra Levant would be first in line to apply. If you think he is some paragon of virtue for the free and unfettered press, you are fooling yourself. I know you think that anything Trudeau does is horrible (which does have some merit), but this is not that.

The media business model has changed and without funding there would be fewer papers. Torstar closed all its Metroland regional papers (like the Etobicoke Guardian), so there are even fewer legit sources of information for people. There is a drastic need for funding. Right now, local journalism is in a serious crisis. Democracy is actually at stake here. We need a free press (which is what we have, despite your misgivings) that provides factual information, not a Rebel-esque spin on reality. I know you don't get that. And I know you aren't going to change. So, maybe you should look into how crown corporations operate, and how this funding scheme works. You obviously don't know, nor can you provide any evidence of interference. Any potential conflict between the government and the media would be a BIG FUCKING STORY that would be politically damaging to the government. So, that negates any chance of conflict. Hell, in the scenario I put about the National Post and the carbon tax, I bet you the Toronto Star and the Globe and Mail would defend the NatPost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,333
5,435
113
Does the law actually prohibit the designation of a group as terrorist simply because they describe themselves as the armed forces of a nation? Aren't the Liberals the current government of Canada? If there is a legislative issue which prevents designating an armed force, or a group within a armed force as terrorists, can't the government introduce legislation to amend the legislation accordingly? If they don't want to do that, shouldn't they have to explain why? And if it is a legislative issue, why haven't other media outlets asked the government whether they will be addressing the issue?

It seems that you could benefit more than most people by following Menzie's reports, because he is at least asking the right questions.
Is he? I mean, sure, ask away. But there is also more going on than just his opinion. There are diplomatic issues to think about. This is not something any government will just make a knee-jerk decision on. And we don't know the behind-the-scenes discussions going on in Foreign Affairs. There could be many great reasons why they don't do this. One of them is that military service is mandatory, so calling anyone who is in the IRGC a terrorist would black-list people who did nothing terrorist related. Look, these are complicated issues that Menzies can't articulate, nor could any politician in an impromptu scrum.
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,348
8,753
113

HUGE WIN: Prosecutor throws out Toronto police charges against David Menzies Rebel News reporter David Menzies was arrested by Toronto police while trying to ask anti-Israel protesters questions in a public space. Moments ago, William Deck, an Ontario Crown prosecutor, told a Toronto justice of the peace that he will not pursue charges against David Menzies, dealing a stinging rebuke to the police who have been targeting him. Deck told the court there is “no reasonable prospect of conviction” — something the whole world could see from the very beginning. The charges in question were laid in March, when David was reporting on a violent pro-Hamas rally outside a Liberal Party fundraiser attended by Justin Trudeau. David was trying to interview the Hamas protesters and they assaulted him. But, bizarrely, police arrested David — it was as if the police were acting as the bodyguards for the Hamas protesters. The entire arrest was caught on video, including police trying to come up with a plausible excuse to arrest David for doing journalism. They finally settled on “obstruction” of police, claiming that David refused to show his ID. That was a laughable lie, as David was literally wearing his ID around his neck on a lanyard, and the officers even knew him by name. It was another embarrassing moment for Toronto’s police force, that has tolerated a crime wave of antisemitic violence. One of the arresting officers was the notorious “Officer Bubbles”, Adam Josephs, who made international headlines for arresting someone for blowing bubbles at a political protest, and then sued people for making cartoons about his anger issues. It’s shocking that Officer Bubbles is allowed back on the streets, but perhaps that was a reason prosecutors decided there was no chance of conviction. Today’s courtroom victory marks the second time this year that charges against David have been dropped — the first time was when Chrystia Freeland’s RCMP bodyguards stepped in David’s way when he was asking her questions, and then falsely claimed he assaulted them. Those charges were dropped almost immediately, as police realized their scheme was caught on video, too. This leaves one more false arrest for which David still faces legal persecution — when he attended a pro-Israel rally outside Toronto’s city hall and attempted to interview antisemitic gate-crashers shouting bigoted insults. Bizarrely, police claim David was “trespassing” — on public property. We’ll win that legal battle, too. But that’s the point — it’s a battle. Today’s court hearing was the third time in a few weeks that David has had to come to court, and that we’ve had to pay for a law firm. The process is the punishment, and none of the police involved have any price to pay for their misconduct. I watched David’s court for over an hour today. He had to sit and wait for a dozen other cases to proceed first. Every criminal lowlife in Toronto was in the same courtroom — and David was forced to go through that same process for the “crime” of journalism. I have promised David we’ll always be there for him, we’ll always cover his legal fees, and we’ll always fight for his freedom. Unfortunately, that’s expensive. If you can help us bear that burden, I’d be grateful. Because once we’ve managed to get the last charges against him thrown out, we plan to sue the police themselves for violating David’s rights as a reporter and a citizen. That’s the only way to get them to stop arresting David every time he attempts to do journalism that contradicts the Liberal Party politics. We’ve got to fight Toronto’s two-tiered policing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skoob

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,348
8,753
113

HUGE VICTORY! Trudeau government backs down, allows Tommy Robinson (
@TRobinsonNewEra
) to travel I can’t believe it. David just beat Goliath. Tommy Robinson has been released by the Trudeau government, and has been given permission to fly to Toronto, where he will give a speech on Sunday night. (There are still tickets left – get yours now at http://TommyTour.ca.) In case you haven’t been following the news, Tommy is a British journalist and free speech activist. He landed in Canada last week, and began a Rebel News speaking tour. But right after his first speech in Calgary, eight police arrested him, bundled him into an SUV, and took him to a holding cell at Calgary’s federal building. He was released on the condition that he not leave southern Alberta – effectively cancelling his speech the next night in Edmonton. But the Toronto speech is not scheduled until Sunday night. The video of Tommy’s arrest went viral globally. It was seen more than 30 million times across different platforms. People started asking questions. Since when has Trudeau ever cracked down on any immigrant? Since when are eight police sent to arrest someone? At Roxham Road, all police ever did was help fake refugees carry their luggage across the border. And since when did the immigration department put an internal travel ban on anyone? There are literally millions of non-citizens in Canada, none of whom are barred from giving speeches. We knew this was illegal. So we hired the best immigration lawyers in the city. Yesterday those lawyers made the case to the Calgary office of Citizenship and Immigration Canada. And today, they told us: they’re backing down! Tommy and I will fly to Toronto, where he will speak about his experience! Thank you to everyone who helped us fight back – not just by spreading the word about this injustice, but also by chipping in to help us pay for the top immigration lawyers. (We haven’t received their bill yet, and it won’t be cheap. But it’s worth it – not just for Tommy himself, but as a big win for freedom of speech.) If you can help us cover that legal bill, please do, by clicking here or going to http://SaveTommy.com. And if you’re in the Toronto area – I hope to see you on Sunday night! There are still some tickets, which you can get at http://TommyTour.ca. Today is a great day for Canadian freedom. It shows you can fight back and win. And courage counts!
 
Toronto Escorts