Thank you bro, but the receptionist there has a high emotional quality and helped remedy this in some way. Of course, in general, girls there are good.Interesting. I had a session with her not too long ago in which she ended the session abruptly mid-way through. Was told by the receptionist that she had a kink on her neck and couldn't continue the session. An hour or two later, she's promoting a duo session on her twitter and posting that she's available. It's funny how some people are. Also sucked being charged the hh fee when you booked and intended for an hour session (price wise). I appreciate Jess nonetheless for attempting to remedy the situation, not her fault nor the club.
I definitely agree with your assessment of Freya. She is genuinely an intelligent, engaging lady who has that girl next door attractiveness with a bit of sensual mystery thrown in. With her natural ability, I forgot that she is relatively new to the industry. Go see her and treat her well!The hostess that I have seen most recently is Freya @ Hush.
1. Yes - She follows through with whatever she says and won't try to upsell you.
2. Yes - The session went by as smooth as it can go. Hostess was not late and did not constantly check her phone/clock.
3. Yes - Good energy, can hold a conversation and doesn't talk your ear off.
Also helps that she may be the most attractive MA that I have encountered. Toss up between Freya, Ruby @ Hush, and Nadia Formerly @ Alpha.
It would be especially good to invite all new members, and not so new members, to read the rules of TERB https://terb.cc/xenforo/pages/forum-rules/Nice to see a second 1-post brand new member vouch for her. Some provider bring out specific type of guys![]()
Was also disappointed with the experience I had with Jennifer- 1 Jennifer PS/AT
+ 1 Ana Hush club
I don’t see any criteria specified in this thread.Start another thread. The criteria you listed is your own. Not the criteria this thread is based on
Unfortunately original first post is goneI don’t see any criteria specified in this thread.
I was simply supporting my conclusion of Freya being a +1. More detail doesn’t hurt![]()
It might be good to restate the criteria so the new guys don't keep facing the wrath the RickFlairOtt.Unfortunately original first post is gone
I believe the baseline was touching on them, sf2, body slide … and the baseline requirement did not require kissing.Correct me if I am wrong but..
SF2, kissing, Body Slide
And the baseline being provided in an engaged manner and not in a detached, mechanical way.I believe the baseline was touching on them, sf2, body slide … and the baseline requirement did not require kissing.
At least in alpha here the baseline from JessicaI believe the baseline was touching on them, sf2, body slide … and the baseline requirement did not require kissing.
While it always fun and games to go back over ancient history, let's not highjack this thread. Let's get back to reviewing the fun and sexy ladies!Don't mess with Jessica. JD's been a bad boy![]()
If by engagement, you mean being friendly (or at least pretend to be), then yes. So, in sum, friendly, sf2, bs.And the baseline being provided in an engaged manner and not in a detached, mechanical way.
I would give Jennifer a 0 if that was allowed. She met the minimum requirement for this list (see posts above) but wasn't good enough that I would personally cast a +1 vote here.Was also disappointed with the experience I had with Jenniferbelow standards, was late, seemed totally disinterested. Not GFE at all.