The Minimum Wage Trap

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,971
5,606
113
This is worth a separate thread:


Why Americans are Angry: The Minimum Wage Trap




By Peter Van Buren | ( Tomdispatch.com) | – –

When presidential candidate Bernie Sanders talks about income inequality, and when other candidates speak about the minimum wage and food stamps, what are they really talking about?

Whether they know it or not, it’s something like this.

My Working Life Then

A few years ago, I wrote about my experience enmeshed in the minimum-wage economy, chronicling the collapse of good people who could not earn enough money, often working 60-plus hours a week at multiple jobs, to feed their families. I saw that, in this country, people trying to make ends meet in such a fashion still had to resort to food benefit programs and charity. I saw an employee fired for stealing lunches from the break room refrigerator to feed himself. I watched as a co-worker secretly brought her two kids into the store and left them to wander alone for hours because she couldn’t afford childcare. (As it happens, 29% of low-wage employees are single parents.)

At that point, having worked at the State Department for 24 years, I had been booted out for being a whistleblower. I wasn’t sure what would happen to me next and so took a series of minimum wage jobs. Finding myself plunged into the low-wage economy was a sobering, even frightening, experience that made me realize just how ignorant I had been about the lives of the people who rang me up at stores or served me food in restaurants. Though millions of adults work for minimum wage, until I did it myself I knew nothing about what that involved, which meant I knew next to nothing about twenty-first-century America.

I was lucky. I didn’t become one of those millions of people trapped as the “working poor.” I made it out. But with all the election talk about the economy, I decided it was time to go back and take another look at where I had been, and where too many others still are.

My Working Life Now

I found things were pretty much the same in 2016 as they were in 2012, which meant — because there was no real improvement — that things were actually worse.

This time around, I worked for a month and a half at a national retail chain in New York City. While mine was hardly a scientific experiment, I’d be willing to bet an hour of my minimum-wage salary ($9 before taxes) that what follows is pretty typical of the New Economy.

Just getting hired wasn’t easy for this 56-year-old guy. To become a sales clerk, peddling items that were generally well under $50 a pop, I needed two previous employment references and I had to pass a credit check. Unlike some low-wage jobs, a mandatory drug test wasn’t part of the process, but there was a criminal background check and I was told drug offenses would disqualify me. I was given an exam twice, by two different managers, designed to see how I’d respond to various customer situations. In other words, anyone without some education, good English, a decent work history, and a clean record wouldn’t even qualify for minimum-wage money at this chain.

And believe me, I earned that money. Any shift under six hours involved only a 15-minute break (which cost the company just $2.25). Trust me, at my age, after hours standing, I needed that break and I wasn’t even the oldest or least fit employee. After six hours, you did get a 45-minute break, but were only paid for 15 minutes of it.

The hardest part of the job remained dealing with… well, some of you. Customers felt entitled to raise their voices, use profanity, and commit Trumpian acts of rudeness toward my fellow employees and me. Most of our “valued guests” would never act that way in other public situations or with their own coworkers, no less friends. But inside that store, shoppers seemed to interpret “the customer is always right” to mean that they could do any damn thing they wished. It often felt as if we were penned animals who could be poked with a stick for sport, and without penalty. No matter what was said or done, store management tolerated no response from us other than a smile and a “Yes, sir” (or ma’am).

The store showed no more mercy in its treatment of workers than did the customers. My schedule, for instance, changed constantly. There was simply no way to plan things more than a week in advance. (Forget accepting a party invitation. I’m talking about childcare and medical appointments.) If you were on the closing shift, you stayed until the manager agreed that the store was clean enough for you to go home. You never quite knew when work was going to be over and no cell phone calls were allowed to alert babysitters of any delay.

And keep in mind that I was lucky. I was holding down only one job in one store. Most of my fellow workers were trying to juggle two or three jobs, each with constantly changing schedules, in order to stitch together something like a half-decent paycheck.

In New York City, that store was required to give us sick leave only after we’d worked there for a full year — and that was generous compared to practices in many other locales. Until then, you either went to work sick or stayed home unpaid. Unlike New York, most states do not require such a store to offer any sick leave, ever, to employees who work less than 40 hours a week. Think about that the next time your waitress coughs.

Minimum Wages and Minimum Hours

Much is said these days about raising the minimum wage (and it should be raised), and indeed, on January 1, 2016, 13 states did raise theirs. But what sounds like good news is unlikely to have much effect on the working poor.

In New York, for instance, the minimum went from $8.75 an hour to the $9.00 I was making. New York is relatively generous. The current federal minimum wage is $7.25 and 21 states require only that federal standard. Presumably to prove some grim point or other, Georgia and Wyoming officially mandate an even lower minimum wage and then unofficially require the payment of $7.25 to avoid Department of Labor penalties. Some Southern states set no basement figure, presumably for similar reasons.

Don’t forget: any minimum wage figure mentioned is before taxes. Brackets vary, but let’s knock an even 10% off that hourly wage just as a reasonable guess about what is taken out of a minimum-wage worker’s salary. And there are expenses to consider, too. My round-trip bus fare every day, for instance, was $5.50. That meant I worked most of my first hour for bus fare and taxes. Keep in mind that some workers have to pay for childcare as well, which means that it’s not impossible to imagine a scenario in which someone could actually come close to losing money by going to work for short shifts at minimum wage.

In addition to the fundamental problem of simply not paying people enough, there’s the additional problem of not giving them enough hours to work. The two unfortunately go together, which means that raising the minimum rate is only part of any solution to improving life in the low-wage world.

At the store where I worked for minimum wage a few years ago, for instance, hours were capped at 39 a week. The company did that as a way to avoid providing the benefits that would kick in once one became a “full time” employee. Things have changed since 2012 — and not for the better.

Four years later, the hours of most minimum-wage workers are capped at 29. That’s the threshold after which most companies with 50 or more employees are required to pay into the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) fund on behalf of their workers. Of course, some minimum wage workers get fewer than 29 hours for reasons specific to the businesses they work for.

It’s Math Time

While a lot of numbers follow, remember that they all add up to a picture of how people around us are living every day.

In New York, under the old minimum wage system, $8.75 multiplied by 39 hours equaled $341.25 a week before taxes. Under the new minimum wage, $9.00 times 29 hours equals $261 a week. At a cap of 29 hours, the minimum wage would have to be raised to $11.77 just to get many workers back to the same level of take-home pay that I got in 2012, given the drop in hours due to the Affordable Care Act. Health insurance is important, but so is food.

In other words, a rise in the minimum wage is only half the battle; employees need enough hours of work to make a living.

About food: if a minimum wage worker in New York manages to work two jobs (to reach 40 hours a week) without missing any days due to illness, his or her yearly salary would be $18,720. In other words, it would fall well below the Federal Poverty Line of $21,775. That’s food stamp territory. To get above the poverty line with a 40-hour week, the minimum wage would need to go above $10. At 29 hours a week, it would need to make it to $15 an hour. Right now, the highest minimum wage at a state level is in the District of Columbia at $11.50. As of now, no state is slated to go higher than that before 2018. (Some cities do set their own higher minimum wages.)

So add it up: The idea of raising the minimum wage (“the fight for $15”) is great, but even with that $15 in such hours-restrictive circumstances, you can’t make a loaf of bread out of a small handful of crumbs. In short, no matter how you do the math, it’s nearly impossible to feed yourself, never mind a family, on the minimum wage. It’s like being trapped on an M.C. Escher staircase.

The federal minimum wage hit its high point in 1968 at $8.54 in today’s dollars and while this country has been a paradise in the ensuing decades for what we now call the “One Percent,” it’s been downhill for low-wage workers ever since. In fact, since it was last raised in 2009 at the federal level to $7.25 per hour, the minimum has lost about 8.1% of its purchasing power to inflation. In other words, minimum-wage workers actually make less now than they did in 1968, when most of them were probably kids earning pocket money and not adults feeding their own children.

In adjusted dollars, the minimum wage peaked when the Beatles were still together and the Vietnam War raged.

Who Pays?

Many of the arguments against raising the minimum wage focus on the possibility that doing so would put small businesses in the red. This is disingenuous indeed, since 20 mega-companies dominate the minimum-wage world. Walmart alone employs 1.4 million minimum-wage workers; Yum Brands (Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, KFC) is in second place; and McDonald’s takes third. Overall, 60% of minimum-wage workers are employed by businesses not officially considered “small” by government standards, and of course carve-outs for really small businesses are possible, as was done with Obamacare.

Keep in mind that not raising wages costs you money.

Those minimum wage workers who can’t make enough and need to go on food assistance? Well, Walmart isn’t paying for those food stamps (now called SNAP), you are. The annual bill that states and the federal government foot for working families making poverty-level wages is $153 billion. A single Walmart Supercenter costs taxpayers between $904,542 and $1.75 million per year in public assistance money, and Walmart employees account for 18% of all food stamps issued. In other words, those everyday low prices at the chain are, in part, subsidized by your tax money.

If the minimum wage goes up, will spending on food benefits programs go down? Almost certainly. But won’t stores raise prices to compensate for the extra money they will be shelling out for wages? Possibly. But don’t worry — raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour would mean a Big Mac would cost all of 17 cents more.

Time Theft

My retail job ended a little earlier than I had planned, because I committed time theft.

You probably don’t even know what time theft is. It may sound like something from a sci-fi novel, but minimum-wage employers take time theft seriously. The basic idea is simple enough: if they’re paying you, you’d better be working. While the concept is not invalid per se, the way it’s used by the mega-companies reveals much about how the lowest wage workers are seen by their employers in 2016.

The problem at my chain store was that its in-store cafe was a lot closer to my work area than the time clock where I had to punch out whenever I was going on a scheduled break. One day, when break time on my shift came around, I only had 15 minutes. So I decided to walk over to that cafe, order a cup of coffee, and then head for the place where I could punch out and sit down (on a different floor at the other end of the store).

We’re talking an extra minute or two, no more, but in such operations every minute is tabulated and accounted for. As it happened, a manager saw me and stepped in to tell the cafe clerk to cancel my order. Then, in front of whoever happened to be around, she accused me of committing time theft — that is, of ordering on the clock. We’re talking about the time it takes to say, “Grande, milk, no sugar, please.” But no matter, and getting chastised on company time was considered part of the job, so the five minutes we stood there counted as paid work.

At $9 an hour, my per-minute pay rate was 15 cents, which meant that I had time-stolen perhaps 30 cents. I was, that is, being nickel and dimed to death.

Economics Is About People

It seems wrong in a society as wealthy as ours that a person working full-time can’t get above the poverty line. It seems no less wrong that someone who is willing to work for the lowest wage legally payable must also give up so much of his or her self-respect and dignity as a kind of tariff. Holding a job should not be a test of how to manage life as one of the working poor.

I didn’t actually get fired for my time theft. Instead, I quit on the spot. Whatever the price is for my sense of self-worth, it isn’t 30 cents. Unlike most of this country’s working poor, I could afford to make such a decision. My life didn’t depend on it. When the manager told a handful of my coworkers watching the scene to get back to work, they did. They couldn’t afford not to.

Peter Van Buren blew the whistle on State Department waste and mismanagement during the “reconstruction” of Iraq in his book We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People. A TomDispatch regular, he writes about current events at We Meant Well. His latest book is Ghosts of Tom Joad: A Story of the #99Percent. His next work will be a novel, Hooper’s War.

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Book, Nick Turse’s Tomorrow’s Battlefield: U.S. Proxy Wars and Secret Ops in Africa, and Tom Engelhardt’s latest book, Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World.

Copyright 2016 Peter Van Buren
 
I have a news flash, you cannot support a family with a minimum wage job, if that's all you can do, please don't have kids....
 
It appears Mr. Van Buren like to complain,.......a lot
Nobody is promised anything when they are born
 
I have a news flash, you cannot support a family with a minimum wage job, if that's all you can do, please don't have kids....

I imagine you are in favour of forced sterilization of people on minimum wage..
 
minimum wage traps were never a problem before the "you must go to college" nonsense started in the 1970
 
Folks like Van Buren, danmand and CUPE believe that people have an intrinsic right to a good paying job regardless of effort, skill, education or experience. If we all thought that way society would have collapsed long ago.
 
Folks like Van Buren, danmand and CUPE believe that people have an intrinsic right to a good paying job regardless of effort, skill, education or experience. If we all thought that way society would have collapsed long ago.

The exact opposite is true. Scandinavian countries have the "right to work" in their constitution. Last I looked societies in Scandinavian were doing quite well.


Where to Invade Next: Michael Moore’s Latest Examination of American “Exceptionalism”

by Michael Donnelly


The creator of the top two Documentaries of all time – Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11 – is back. Michael Moore and his merry band of co-conspirators have a new documentary out in an expanding number of theaters after a six-year hiatus. It’s an Election Year gift.

Where to Invade Next is not an expose of the Perma-War nature of 21st Century American Imperialism, as the title would seem to imply. It is rather a sly travelogue take on how other countries have used American ideals to gain many cultural improvements US citizens are told are unattainable by both wings of the Wall Street Perma-War Party.

Reprising his bemused everyman role, Moore visits Germany, France, Slovenia, Tunisia, Portugal and a raft of Scandinavian countries. Carrying a huge Old Glory over his shoulder, he checks in on how these countries have attained – Universal Health Care, required months of paid vacation, workers say in management and sense of ownership of their work, a humane penal system, civilized drug policies, free college, far more women in positions of power in both business and government, more cultural and racial diversity…down to four-star school lunches.

Moore introduces us to many wonderful Public Servants…the unarmed (“our brains and talk are our weapons”) Scandinavian police and prison guards, in particular, seem like an impossible species by American standards. Yet, they cite Michigan’s abandonment of Capital Punishment in 1845 as one of the models for their rehabilitation-based, instead of punishment-based, Justice system. Even parents of murdered children seek rehabilitation, instead of vengeance (the scene with one bereaved father will make you cry).

An Icelandic prosecutor cites the legal precedents used by the Reagan Administration going after eh Savings and Loans crooks as the model for Iceland’s charging and convicting the banksters who crashed their economy. Said economy has recovered far faster than any of the countries who let the banksters off the hook in their recent round of plunder. What the single mom former president of Iceland and three women business leaders from that country have to say is a highlight of the film.

Tiny, poor Slovenia provides free college (even to foreigners); again, something that once was done in some US states. Portugal has seen a big drop in addiction and crime since the country decriminalized all drugs.

Workers are required to take those paid breaks as stress is recognized as anti-productive. CEOs eat lunch with the employees and make a far less higher differential in pay than the employees. No one has to worry about losing it all due to a health crisis.

Yes, other countries are pulling it off and often using concepts born in the US to do it. When Ted Cruz mocked Bernie Sanders as a someone who would make a “great president of Norway,” it is clear that the audience who clapped and laughed have some serious research to do. Moore does it for them.

As usual, even though he tones the sarcasm down and is funnier and more impish than usual in his latest effort to cut to the chase as to what is misguided with American culture/politics, Moore came in for immediate abuse from the usual suspects – right-wingers who are always outraged at his exposing their lies and leftists who always feel Moore does not go far enough.

I laughed. I cried. And, I was angry when I left the theater…angry about how badly my generation has blown it the past 50 years with this Imperial crap. 900+ bases in over 150 countries is not “Defending Freedom” (unless you count freedom to exploit). It is an Empire. And that Empire has cost us dearly in so many ways. While we were busily garrisoning the planet, other countries were busy making life more equitable for their citizens…even welcoming immigrants and giving them the same rights.

See this Oscar-nominated Documentary. If enough people do, we may just join the rest of the civilized world and leave the Neo-Con/Neo-Lib “no, we can’t” corporate/Imperial blather and the “exceptional” fear and me-firstism behind it to the dust bin of history where it belongs.
 
countries like Germany lets high school kids choose college or skills trades/vocational field. unlike college obsessed north america where kids forced into college that have minimum wage traps
 
countries like Germany lets high school kids choose college or skills trades/vocational field. unlike college obsessed north america where kids forced into college that have minimum wage traps

Yeah, but in northern Europe trade organizations are in effect strong unions, requiring 4 years of vocational (college) training to join.
 
countries like Germany lets high school kids choose college or skills trades/vocational field. unlike college obsessed north america where kids forced into college that have minimum wage traps

Lot of places in Europe have technical high schools for the trades. You basically get a solid trade certificate without wasting time with college courses.
 
I have a news flash, you cannot support a family with a minimum wage job, if that's all you can do, please don't have kids....

Great idea, tell the working poor they aren't allowed to have kids.
That'll really help fix the situation.

Why is it that you could live off retail wages here decades ago and you can't now?
Do you think that's better?

Why can you live off of those wages in some Euro countries but you can't in the States and can barely here?
Do you think that makes the US better?
 
Great idea, tell the working poor they aren't allowed to have kids.
That'll really help fix the situation.

Why is it that you could live off retail wages here decades ago and you can't now?
Do you think that's better?

Why can you live off of those wages in some Euro countries but you can't in the States and can barely here?
Do you think that makes the US better?

You're not suppose to live off the minimum wage, you suppose to survive. Minimum wage is for students and immigrants without skills. I oppose governments imposing wages on employers. The way to fix it is to keep the minimum wage low and to supplement it with social assistance. You cannot just keep increasing the labor costs in the private sector because it is very elastic and very efficient at adapting by streamlining, moving and automation. In the end, you end up with the same problem down the road.
 
Lot of places in Europe have technical high schools for the trades. You basically get a solid trade certificate without wasting time with college courses.

There are also countries in Europe and I believe even in Australia where you can go to law school directly out of high school.
 
There are also countries in Europe and I believe even in Australia where you can go to law school directly out of high school.

The educational system in northern Europe is (or at least was when I was there) organized differently than in North America.

After high school, you would go directly to medical school, law school, engineering school, theological school etc.
 
You're not suppose to live off the minimum wage, you suppose to survive. Minimum wage is for students and immigrants without skills. I oppose governments imposing wages on employers. The way to fix it is to keep the minimum wage low and to supplement it with social assistance. You cannot just keep increasing the labor costs in the private sector because it is very elastic and very efficient at adapting by streamlining, moving and automation. In the end, you end up with the same problem down the road.

That's already happening in the states. Work full time on minimum wage (though that requires two jobs, since no minimum wage job is full time hours because it costs employers more) and you still qualify for food stamps. What you've done instead is created a whole class of serfs who don't make enough to support the consumer society. Even with tipping, its still a serf's life.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...l-feel-ok-about-tipping-in-the-united-states/

Its just not good for society.
 
That's already happening in the states. Work full time on minimum wage (though that requires two jobs, since no minimum wage job is full time hours because it costs employers more) and you still qualify for food stamps. What you've done instead is created a whole class of serfs who don't make enough to support the consumer society. Even with tipping, its still a serf's life.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...l-feel-ok-about-tipping-in-the-united-states/

Its just not good for society.
Marx explained all this.

An unfettered capitalistic system like in the US is dependent on a class of desperate workers threatened by hunger, sickness and authority. Why do you think nothing has been done about the 10 million "illegal" immigrants in the US? The problem could be solved in one day by making it illegal to employ these so called illegal immigrants. But of course that will not happen, because they are essential to the capitalistic system.
 
Great idea, tell the working poor they aren't allowed to have kids.
That'll really help fix the situation.

Actually the working poor should already know they can not afford to have kids
Having a kid is a big responsibility and if you are not able to feed, cloth and house them properly then you just should not have any

Why is it that you could live off retail wages here decades ago and you can't now?
Do you think that's better?

The world is a far more competitive place
Ones opinion of whether it is better or not is irrelevant
This is the world we live in, you either obtain the skills / education in order to earn a decent living or you accept that fact that you will struggle for your whole life on minimiun wage



Why can you live off of those wages in some Euro countries but you can't in the States and can barely here?
You had better check your data.
Europe , especially the Nordic countries are extremely expensive places to live
Flipping burgers at MCDonalds will not cut there either


Do you think that makes the US better?

As long as the US is not run by the loonie left,,,,, Yes
 
Marx explained all this.

An unfettered capitalistic system like in the US is dependent on a class of desperate workers threatened by hunger, sickness and authority. Why do you think nothing has been done about the 10 million "illegal" immigrants in the US? The problem could be solved in one day by making it illegal to employ these so called illegal immigrants. But of course that will not happen, because they are essential to the capitalistic system.


Quoting Marx will not help your argument
His theories were put to the test for 70 years in Russia
The result was not encouraging
 
Quoting Marx will not help your argument
His theories were put to the test for 70 years in Russia
The result was not encouraging

True, it will not help with someone like you that are willfully uninformed. You chose to disregard facts.

Marx' theories were the basis for the post war policies in northern Europe, that were responsible for lifting prosperity, equality and quality of life.
 
Quoting Marx will not help your argument
His theories were put to the test for 70 years in Russia
The result was not encouraging

Marx never seen a middle class, that's why his theories were so spectacularly wrong. He only saw the oppressors and the oppressed. He could not imagine cooperation(even an adversarial one) between the private, public and the democratic electorate that could arrive at a social and economic cease fire.