If they welcome it as you say why would they limit the free views?No, as usual you got that wrong.
Circumventing paywalls isn't even an issue here, so not sure why you would bring up something so laughably irrelevant. There is absolutely nothing wrong with getting as many free views as the Washington Post allows it. That is the operative phrase. The fact that the Washington Post allows it. Which means they dont just allow it, they welcome it. They want it. They need it. They live it. And they love it. You should too.
Now, where is that link you were yammering on about?
Do they just assume people will find a way on their own to circumvent it?
Why go through all the trouble if they "welcome it"? Why not just give people unlimited free views?
You think everyone knows how to get around it? Those that don't will just go elsewhere...how would that benefit them exactly?
You're desperately trying to wiggle your way around this rather then just admitting you circumvented their system.
If you can't be honest and admit that, why should I assume you will offer me an apology for saying I'm lying about the info I had posted?
Do you have integrity or not?






