I advise anyone who believes what really happened not to bother trying to change this man's (Fuji's) mind. No matter what 'proof' you may have, who your source is or how logical or factual their argument, he will accept nothing. Even if Albert Einstein posited a reason for the collapse of WTC 7 for instance, this man would find an excuse to refute it.
He will dispute anyone's credentials, judge them according to his own peculiar criteria....anything to force his version to fit the facts.
Its a waste of time bothering. Truth seekers need only to remember a few things:
a) A hit like this took years to prepare and execute. The thermite used to destroy the twin towers, evident in the smoke and fires and in the debris, was placed in the towers very carefully and slowly, it was not something done over a weekend. Kroll Associates, owned by a dual Israeli American citizen and who were in charge of security were very careful in this respect so that no suspicion was aroused.
b) There is still no plausible explanation as to why the center core of the twin towers gave way. Fire from jet fuel as well as impact shock would be insufficient to make the entire structure collapse the way it did. The fact that Stephan Kaufmann, a dual Israeli/American had a hand in the preparation of the NIST report is sufficient to doubt its impartiality.
c) The software use in most of the defense department's computers necessary to scramble jets in case of an attack like that on 9/11 came from PTECH, an Israeli company and Mossad front.
d) Experts are, in fact, trying to speak out but they risk ruining their reputations and being labelled cranks. The controlled media will make sure that, through smearing and distortion of fact, any point of view deviating from what has been dictated to the masses will not be heard, or, if it is, will be ridiculed and dismissed.
e) The fact that millions of dollars worth of put options were placed on selected airline stocks in the days leading up to the attack and that no investigation has been made to track who exactly purchased these options.
f) That the source of the two hour advanced warning put out over the Israeli 'Odigo' Messenging Service was never investigated.
Finally, no one can deny that the actions of the following individuals were very suspicious indeed:
i) The dancing Israelis who were in fact Mossed agents there to 'record' what happened.
ii) Larry Silverstein, who leased the WTC from the NY Port Authority only weeks before the hit and, magically, did not show up for his usual breakfast at the top of the South Tower the day of the attack, nor did his daughter.
iii) George Bush, who lied about seeing the first hit live on a television station when such a broadcast never took place.
iv) Dick Cheney, who put himself in charge of defensive procedures on 9/11 and told operators to 'stand down' even though one of the jets was advancing nearer and nearer to the pentagon.
v) The Project for a New American Century which stated that only a galvanizing event, like a new Pearl Harbour, will motivate Americans to declare war on 'terrorists' and the fact that almost all the authors of this 'project' had positions of responsibility in the Bush Administration.
I will not get into an argument over the physics of this attack but one thing is obvious. Any who dispute the party line are always, to a man, attacked as nuts, crazies or terrorist sympathizers. The easiest way to deal with them, besides smearing or ridiculing them into silence. It is so much easier than simply having another (impartial) investigation into everything that went on on September 11.
I have always wondered why the powers that be refuse to defuse the arguments of the 'conspiracy theorists' in this way? What are they afraid of? Money for a new investigation is certainly not a problem. Plenty was available for Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and JP Morgan but, then again, they're part of the cabal that rules America anyways, aren't they......
