And that is exactly the problem JRK it is guessing. Justice Douglas, is being trashed yet none of us know the slightest bit more than very cursory articles in the press have mentioned.I'm guessing that she was totally into it as well
And that is exactly the problem JRK it is guessing. Justice Douglas, is being trashed yet none of us know the slightest bit more than very cursory articles in the press have mentioned.I'm guessing that she was totally into it as well
It seems to be a site wherein white women post for black male partners. I don't qualify on either score.....oagre, how many pics do you have posted on Darkcavern?
they have been taken down.......don't think there are any copies floating aroundWhere are thes pics?
any link?
Um. If you are told to destroy the evidence but the idiot husband does not remove the content from the web site - then perhaps it is not that 'black & white.'He was thinking enough to get 25 grand out of the deal 8 years ago. Only thing is that he signed a confidentiality agreement PLUS an order to destroy all evidence. He has done neither. I hope he has a damn good lawyer on this - he's going to need it.
Most likely he's probably got Lionel Hutz on the case telling him that this is a good idea.
How about if you agree to settle a case and - presumably - sign a release that you will not sue and then sue for the same thing all over again 7 years later (and outside the limitation period, I would guess)? Except this time, you are suing for a ridiculously large amount and hold a press conference to disgrace the people involved.Um. If you are told to destroy the evidence but the idiot husband does not remove the content from the web site - then perhaps it is not that 'black & white.'
Syn
My point was simply that you may wish to have removed the content from the internet once this came to light years ago.How about if you agree to settle a case and - presumably - sign a release that you will not sue and then sue for the same thing all over again 7 years later (and outside the limitation period, I would guess)? Except this time, you are suing for a ridiculously large amount and hold a press conference to disgrace the people involved.
That black and white enough for you?
Or is confirms that there are people in high places that crave giving up control behind closed doors. My domina friend tells me that she sees a number of judges, politicians and respected lawyers. For some reason being spanked and degraded is an outlet for them.This one has it all boy.
This confirms my long held belief that the higher the education the woman has - the wilder and kinkier she is in the bedroom.
Been there, done that, and done it again, got bored frankly.Or is confirms that there are people in high places that crave giving up control behind closed doors. My domina friend tells me that she sees a number of judges, politicians and respected lawyers. For some reason being spanked and degraded is an outlet for them.
Syn
Okay. good points.Been there, done that, and done it again, got bored frankly.
It's not really about giving up control frankly since really, he who has the money ultimately has the power. Your domina friend is just doing a service in return for cash. IMHO, unless she manages to convince her well to do clients to drain their bank accounts and give it all to her (some might) she really has no power over them. She's just doing as she's told to do for a buck. No different than your run of the mill SP. (Now if she manages to convince them to sign over their net worth - then she's in control.)
The acts you're describing are simply sexual acts taken outside "the norm" because they're kinkier and more exciting. The old in and out can get boring for a man and as a result, we will do stupid shit just for the rush and or to see what it's all about.
In my experience the women with higher educations are definitely kinkier and wilder in the bedroom. They've read and learned over the the years and opened their minds to new ideas, including sexual ideas. They are at least curious about more than just the old in and out. Those with no higher education tend to be more rigid in their outlook - black and white, right and wrong and definitely NOT into the kinkier stuff (they view it as degrading, ironically, sex is sometimes best when it is humiliating).
Just my 2 cents.
I agree.How about if you agree to settle a case and - presumably - sign a release that you will not sue and then sue for the same thing all over again 7 years later (and outside the limitation period, I would guess)? Except this time, you are suing for a ridiculously large amount and hold a press conference to disgrace the people involved.
That black and white enough for you?
It's a fetish or a kink, simple as that.Okay. good points.
now, can someone explain to me how does a white husband who supposedly 'has control' and has 'power' over a submissive white woman derive pleasure from having her surrendered to a black male while the white husband is the 'cuckold' and also submits and also seeks to please the black male as being the alpha bull - as the white male derives pleasure just by helplessly looking on as another man takes his wife?
as far as i know, this is what a cuckold does - or maybe that didn't happen - i have to read the article again.
question is: what pleasure does a cuckold get by putting himself in a position where he helplessly just watches as another man takes his wife??
My Analysis of this 'kink' goes like this:It's a fetish or a kink, simple as that.
Many men are very turned on knowing that their woman is a horny woman and can't at all levels be trusted. (Often times have a dutiful wife at home is boring - you know she's only there for you - where's the challange in that? But knowing that your woman can't completely be trusted adds excitment to the equation. The competition. The whole thing can be a little complex and there are various lables such as "hot wife" i.e. a woman who has sex with other men with the full knowledge of the husband and he is full sexual acomplice / partner in it to the "Ultimate Cuckold" where the wife has sex with other men, but not the husband - ever, and he has little or no control over her other than he signs over his cheque.
I'm willing to bet that in the case of the couple in question, they are somewhere between "hot wifing" and "cuckolding". At the end of the day, the Stud is just a prop in their sex lives. He's welcome to fuck the wife, but they want him to leave once it's done. Sure, he gets to have sex with a woman (possibly even good looking) for free, but he's really just a cock and balls to them. Like Syn's Domina friend - doing what he's told. Unless he takes over the house and the woman - he has no power. He comes over, he performs, he leaves when he's told. (Not a bad deal for most guys to be honest, but at the end of the day, he is just a prop.)
Maya Blue posted this a while back, and it describes it fairly well.
http://www.nerve.com/dispatches/ma/cuckold