All I said is that you accused him of talking about porn when he did no such thing.Why are right wingers always crying about lack of freedom then demanding people burn books?
There are no books pushing pedophilia in school and public libraries, same with trans and sex abuse.
You just want to cut down on other people's freedoms.
What you said in no way refutes what I said. None.
Also nothing I said suggests I want to cut down on other people's freedoms, or any public policy prescription. Nor did I take a position on burning books [nor for that matter did the person you responded to].
For that matter suggesting that some books should not be in public libraries =/= burning books. So that's a a lie. Now it's a big world out there, I am sure you can find someone of just about any orientation that wants to burn books, but nobody is suggesting that here, in this conversation.
You brought up porn. I pointed out that he never said anything about porn. This is where if you were worthy of respect you would withdraw your original statement and reframe it in terms of accuracy.
But no, you show either a massive inability to understand anything, or such a deep desire to stay on topic that you are again willing to lie and bullshit.
I have to wonder, are you really a complete bullshit artist or are you lies more rooted in your utter inability to comprehend what you are reading.
Also further note, just because I take someone's side on a point of order doesn't in no way suggest I agree or disagree with them on any topic. I have a history of complaining that I am being compelled to defend some odious shitstain on terb often with the Greta "How dare you" meme. Being a political cultist, I am sure that is a very difficult concept to understand. I mean after all I consider Hitler to be a very unpleasant chap but he was right about donuts, they are delicious.