You and I have banged heads a few times in the various forums, but on this we agree. It's clear from posts from a LARGE number of members that it's not just your word against FUJI's and his word count for the square root of squat. I think FUJI's been a little heavy on the nitrous oxide tonight.
The Bash Fuji Thread
- Thread starter havingfun
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Its sad when its all against you, isn't it?Blackie, you've been reduced to cheerleading for a long time now, but cheer leading for flubby? Haha, wow.
But I'm glad to see you've already prepared your attack:
Don't let the "moral minority" that is so outraged at my behavior that they're still going 28 pages later with a consensus
Just keep up the classy work, Ijuf.
Reviewing the combined intelligence of the "moral minority" here--colour me unworried. I know my position is controversial. It's also right. The fact that so many of you in combination have been unable to come up with credible arguments, and have been reduced to cheerleading each others insults, then trying to pass that off as a debating point, is pretty telling.
Plainly if I was talking about cheating I was talking about simultaneous partners. You would have to be a complete fucking idiot to read it in any other way, I was just being nice to you before, but now I'm not: You're dumb.Now what I went on to say is that fuji uses the phrase "desire multiple sexual partners" in a deliberately ambiguous way
No you idiot it is not the same as "cheating". The desire is for multiple partners. Cheating is ONE solution to that desire.getting through claims about cheating being a basic desire and then when challenged blustering away about how it is obvious we all want to fuck many women. I suggested he just not use the phrase desiring multiple sex partners and just say cheating if that is what he means.
Again, you can't really be this unfathomably stupid. Plainly "wanting sex with lots of women" is a desire, and cheating is a behavior which actualizes that desire. There are other behaviors that could actualize that desire--not all behaviors are possible for all people, based on their situation. Someone desirable enough could probably entice multiple partners into an exclusive relationship. Others cheat. Still others can't even pull of cheating and are forced into open relationships.Now watch ijuf change the meaning of "wanting sex with lots of women" from the sense of "we want to cheat" that Simon and Rid objected to, to Fuji's new meaning of just liking chicks.
The desire is actualized by different people in different ways. You, however, are a blithering idiot who can't comprehend the difference between a desire, and a behavior which seeks to actualize the desire.
No, what I kept stumbling into was the fact that you are too stupid to grok the difference between a deduction and an assumption. I told you from the outset (in fact, said it before you joined the debate) that the life affirming assumption was an assumption. Your two neurons were apparently not well enough connected to one another to figure out that meant it was an assumption. I then went on later to attack the notion of the naturalistic fallacy itself--thus you've been defeated on two fronts.He kept stumbling into the fallacy yet kept denying he was
SW1;First ijuf denied he was committing the naturalistic fallacy, which in his case is reasoning from cheating is normal to we ought not thus say it is bad. He kept stumbling into the fallacy yet kept denying he was, until he started saying the fallacy is not a fallacy. But read what he says above. He just doesn't get it. Think about what he is implying. He is implying if you cheat, you therefore think it cannot be bad, and thus it is wrong for you to morally sanction him. That just IS naturalistic fallacy. For fucks sake! Most do not take thus short-cut. Cheating will mean a lot of things, depending upon a host of judgments normal people make about their behaviour. Fuji, as always, tries to ram his ridiculously over-blown life affirming claptrap down your throat by treating one common denominator as enough to warrant the rest of his shit. Pathetic.
Just saying it does not make it true, dickwad. Though we can tell the kinds of verbal abuse to which ijuf most likely subjects his wife and work subordinates.
FUJI just doesn't really care/understand that almost everyone on TERB sees through his BS, especially after these last few threads that have shown all that he is been stripped naked of his puffery and is just a jerk. Yes he has the perfect right to be one, but no one is buying his snake oil.
Cheerleading for the losing team again, I see. It's good that you don't try and make any points, we both know you're not smart enough. Stick to cheerleading and potty humour.SW1;
FUJI just doesn't really care/understand that almost everyone on TERB sees through his BS, especially after these last few threads that have shown all that he is been stripped naked of his puffery and is just a jerk. Yes he has the perfect right to be one, but no one is buying his snake oil.
You fail Sw1tch. My original statement when I wrote "multiple sexual partners" I plainly meant simultaneously. For one thing, the study I cited clearly defined it as simultaneous. For another we were talking about cheating. You would have to be a complete buffoon to think I might have meant consecutive partners.
This is an example of your pedantic over-literal readings of arguments. The words "multiple sexual partners" isn't clear in and of itself, but put into the context of our debate and what we're talking about it's pretty fucking clear.
And what makes you a pedant is that even after this blatantly obvious point is clarified for you, you still go on about it, as if it's meaningful.
If this is the only sort of argument you're able to mount now, I clearly win.
This is an example of your pedantic over-literal readings of arguments. The words "multiple sexual partners" isn't clear in and of itself, but put into the context of our debate and what we're talking about it's pretty fucking clear.
And what makes you a pedant is that even after this blatantly obvious point is clarified for you, you still go on about it, as if it's meaningful.
If this is the only sort of argument you're able to mount now, I clearly win.
i don't know if you insulted them either, i was throwing a bluff out there and hoping you would admit to something lol.I may have participated in it but I don't think I have ever insulted them. To start with, I don't believe that a common man like me or you can insult a movie star or a royalty. If I was a celebrity or simply independently wealthy I would try hard not to give a fuck what a common man thinks about me.
this i know, celebs and people of wealth care more about what the common man thinks of them than they think of themselves. why do you think they hide and lie and are very deceitful about everything from what the make to who they are sleeping with. the more you have the more you have to lose. so famous and rich folk have to lie to keep the image that gave them what they got so they can get more. people with nothing can be honest, stand up people that don't fuck around and bullshit because they have nothing to lose by being honest.
Well put, Sw1tch.
Fuji really must be a psychopath, no normal person still think that people here like him and that he has won any argument.
You are probably correct that this probably mirrors his real life, but that's probably hard for him to tell in his little basement.
Fuji really must be a psychopath, no normal person still think that people here like him and that he has won any argument.
You are probably correct that this probably mirrors his real life, but that's probably hard for him to tell in his little basement.
Apparently the weekend up north with the wife is boring or not going well, as FUJI finds it necessary to cruise and post on TERB this morning. She must be having another nap. He really must think we're maroons. He life as he reflects it on TERB is nothing more than a film set and most see it as such.
You should put the words "reading" in quotes, I'm not really sure what you do, but it isn't what most people would call reading. That ordinarily implies comprehension and you lack that. You continually misrepresent my arguments, you state stuff I never said, you assume things I disagree with, and then you attack (usually poorly) arguments I never made, and then claim you refuted something I never said.My reading
You've convinced the local clown and the local cheerleader that you've said something intelligent, but I doubt you've actually convinced yourself. Although it is possible that you're really just stupid instead of malicious.
What you do is quote me, and then paraphrase it into your own version which is completely different than what I wrote.I quote you directly and show you to be either wrong-headed or just idiotic.
For example, how many times did we go round, and round, and round with you claiming that my argument was "cheating happens therefore it's good" and each time I would point out that is NOT my argument, and yet you would repeat it again? Over and over you made this exact same misrepresentation, fooling exactly who?
You are a fucking clown. My clarifying for you what I meant in my own post is "pontificating", is it? I think you are a fool and an idiot. I think you have no interest and no ability to carry out a proper debate.Case in point is your own pontificating about what multiple sexual partners means.
I think you are a troll, and not a very intelligent one either. Thick forehead kind living under a bridge.
I never claimed that cheating was hardwired. That is you, yet again, misrepresenting what I said. You haven't actually shown that you are capable of comprehending my posts.when someone objects to your claims about cheating being natural or hardwired or life affirming or some such other claptrap, you all of a sudden call them idiotic for thinking guys don't want to have sex with many women.
at least he is here because of the ladiesApparently the weekend up north with the wife is boring or not going well, as FUJI finds it necessary to cruise and post on TERB this morning. She must be having another nap. He really must think we're maroons. He life as he reflects it on TERB is nothing more than a film set and most see it as such.
meanwhile you are here because of people like him
Don't give up your day job, 'cause you suck at sizing people up.at least he is here because of the ladies
meanwhile you are here because of people like him
Is it possible FUJI was standing in front of his mirrors and forgot to not think out loud when you're alone in a room. It makes people think odd things about you. Oh, too late.Getting angry, buddy? Lashing out a bit, now, aren't we? You could not win a single debating point, so now you resort to every name you can think of, along with crying about how I misrepresent you again. I am sure you verbally abuse your wife too, and given your type (psychopathic), I bet one but not both of your parents belittled you as a child. You run to attempts to belittle people so frequently that it is plainly obvious you can't handle adult situations.
Unfortunately for you, no amount of insult - not really insulting, actually, cuz you just make me laugh at you - can hide the fact that your intellect is painfully shallow. You are just a very little man who needs to exploit and deceive people to make yourself feel less like the little boy verbally abused by one parent and inconsistently loved by the other.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
