Sexy Friends Toronto

The Agony of Aleppo

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
This is where we get into a circular argument. It's ok for us to do it because they do it.
The point is that some fans of Putin here have no problem criticizing the US yet defend aggressive Russian policy of doing the same thing or worse.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
The more humane way? They have stolen the lives of 2 generations of people living there. It not humane, its much worse then what Russia is doing. Its a giant concentration camp.
What utter crap. Gaza is as it is simply because Hamas terrorists have chosen to perpetuate their crusade. Israel allows in tonnes and tonnes of aid and people routinely enter and leave. The only thing they don't allow in is weapons and the materials Hamas uses to build their cross-border tunnels.

Of course you complain about Israel inspecting shipments into Gaza but defend Russia putting Aleppo under siege and bombing the shit out of the city.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,716
98
48
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Turkey could shoot down an old Russian SU-24 in a sneak attack but it is would probably lose an air war with Russia pretty decisively.
Not as a NATO member
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Turkey could shoot down an old Russian SU-24 in a sneak attack but it is would probably lose an air war with Russia pretty decisively.
Russia could eventually bring numerically superior numbers of its technologically inferior planes, so sure.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Slimebag Fuji should leave aviation alone and just stick to topics he knows well such as whore mongering. To suggest that a Turkish F-16 can go toe to toe with an SU-27 Flanker in a dogfight, and to suggest it is technologically superior than the SU-27 just goes to show his gargantuan lack of knowledge.
F-16 and SU-27 are pretty much equivalent. Same generation of aircraft.

It would come down to numbers which would ultimately come down to how shitty Russia's aircraft carriers are getting and whether they could put enough planes in the region to take on Turkey. Turkey would obviously have the home court advantage (lots of airfields, ground based anti-aircraft systems, radar installations, AWACS). Russia would need to bring a LOT of planes to counter that -- it's unclear if they still have the ability to do so.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
100,189
27,353
113
What utter crap. Gaza is as it is simply because Hamas terrorists have chosen to perpetuate their crusade.
No, Israel built the wall and turned it into the world's largest open air prison.
Hamas is just rebelling against living in a place the UN has stated will be unliveable in about 3 years, due to the Israeli blockade.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,425
3,326
113
What utter crap. Gaza is as it is simply because Hamas terrorists have chosen to perpetuate their crusade. Israel allows in tonnes and tonnes of aid and people routinely enter and leave. The only thing they don't allow in is weapons and the materials Hamas uses to build their cross-border tunnels.

Of course you complain about Israel inspecting shipments into Gaza but defend Russia putting Aleppo under siege and bombing the shit out of the city.
Russia isn't bombing Gaza and putting it under seige, they are softening up the opposition for a final assault by the Syrian army so the scumbags can be rooted out.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
No, Israel built the wall and turned it into the world's largest open air prison.
Hamas is just rebelling against living in a place the UN has stated will be unliveable in about 3 years, due to the Israeli blockade.
All of which is due to illegal, racist terrorist attacks by Hamas. When Israel withdrew from Gaza the airport and port were open, the border was open. Until Hamas started smuggling missiles, conducting cross border raids to kill Jews, etc.

You can't face that truth.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,425
3,326
113
Not as a NATO member
As a NATO member we would all lose that one. But the question is, can NATO deploy planes quickly enough to defend Turkey? That is not clear. It is much harder then you think. If Russia destroyed Turkeys Air Force in retaliation, to a shoot down, would NATO then dare to attack Russia causing a nuclear war? Or would they just say...."fair enough lets stop here ? "
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,425
3,326
113
All of which is due to illegal, racist terrorist attacks by Hamas. When Israel withdrew from Gaza the airport and port were open, the border was open. Until Hamas started smuggling missiles, conducting cross border raids to kill Jews, etc.

You can't face that truth.
Some day will you answer my question about why there are laws on the books of Israel SPECIFICALLY ordering the seizure of Arab properties when arab residents fled the war?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,425
3,326
113
F-16 and SU-27 are pretty much equivalent. Same generation of aircraft.

It would come down to numbers which would ultimately come down to how shitty Russia's aircraft carriers are getting and whether they could put enough planes in the region to take on Turkey. Turkey would obviously have the home court advantage (lots of airfields, ground based anti-aircraft systems, radar installations, AWACS). Russia would need to bring a LOT of planes to counter that -- it's unclear if they still have the ability to do so.
Russia only has one aircraft carrier and its pretty shitty. Carriers would not be decisive in such a war since Russia is right next to Turkey. The SU-27 is dynamically superior to F-16 but its the avionics and missiles that would decide the situation. If Russia can field enough of the advanced variants of SU-27 like SU 30 and SU-35 then Turkish F-16s will have a hard time. Only F-22s would do well against these. Even F-15s would be hard pressed. Latest version of Eurofighter will also be quite good as will Rafale.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Some day will you answer my question about why there are laws on the books of Israel SPECIFICALLY ordering the seizure of Arab properties when arab residents fled the war?
Because leaving properties to rot for 65 years isn't productive. Israel has committed to reimbursing foreign Arab owners in every peace proposal.

I note that Arab nations have never committed to reimbursing property seized from Jews when an equal number of them fled in the opposite direction.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
No, Israel built the wall and turned it into the world's largest open air prison.
Hamas is just rebelling against living in a place the UN has stated will be unliveable in about 3 years, due to the Israeli blockade.
This is one of your most amusing revisions of history.

Hamas openly admits they are 'rebelling' against the presence of Jews in the region.

(and the blockade only exists to minimize Hamas' ability to pursue their stated aims)
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Russia isn't bombing Gaza ...
:der: Of course not. If they were you'd be cheering them.

Both ISIS and Hamas are designated terrorists entities in Canada. I don't see why trying to kill off one is good but killing the other is bad.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,716
98
48
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
As a NATO member we would all lose that one. But the question is, can NATO deploy planes quickly enough to defend Turkey? That is not clear. It is much harder then you think. If Russia destroyed Turkeys Air Force in retaliation, to a shoot down, would NATO then dare to attack Russia causing a nuclear war? Or would they just say...."fair enough lets stop here ? "
It's a substantial FOB for the US Airforce and home to 25% of NATOs most advanced tactical nukes. So yeah, Russia's second world military wouldn't last long.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,425
3,326
113
Because leaving properties to rot for 65 years isn't productive. Israel has committed to reimbursing foreign Arab owners in every peace proposal.

I note that Arab nations have never committed to reimbursing property seized from Jews when an equal number of them fled in the opposite direction.
The legislation was passed shortly after they left. Sorry a lie is not an answer. Israel has not stated in even broad strokes what that compensation will be. Saying Arab countries do no compensate Jews is a stupid answer. Germany certainly compensated Jews, still do today. So you are saying we can only expect Israel to act like another flea bag Arab country? Its not considered "leaving property" when you seize it and do not allow the owners back into the country.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
25,425
3,326
113
It's a substantial FOB for the US Airforce and home to 25% of NATOs most advanced tactical nukes. So yeah, Russia's second world military wouldn't last long.
You don't think the Russians would be smart enough to disable the that base first with runway denial weapons?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
100,189
27,353
113
This is one of your most amusing revisions of history.

Hamas openly admits they are 'rebelling' against the presence of Jews in the region.

(and the blockade only exists to minimize Hamas' ability to pursue their stated aims)
There are no Jews in Gaza, how are they rebelling against Jews in Gaza?
Unless you're noting that Israel is keeping the residents from living in the rest of Palestine, is that what you mean?

The blockade was an idiotic attempt to make the people of Gaza rebel against Hamas.
Instead, it will lead Israel to more charges at the ICC.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts