Thou shalt wash thine mouth out with soap!The problem is that most political discussion are not (and should not be) exercises in formal logic.
thou shalt provide an example of a valuable illogical discussionThe problem is that most political discussion are not (and should not be) exercises in formal logic.
Ex. 1) “Chuck you Farley!”thou shalt provide an example of a valuable illogical discussion
Virtually every discussion ever among humans.thou shalt provide an example of a valuable illogical discussion
Virtually every discussion ever among humans.
Did none of you ever study rhetoric?
Logic is useful, and understanding when a logical fallacy is in play (especially when it is disguising itself as a logical argument when it isn't one) is also useful.
But the idea that "only logical discussions are good" is just silly. (Especially the idea that if something isn't a logical argument formally it is weak or should be disregarded.)
I'd like to think I've been doing it in the past so doing it in the future should not present an insurmountable problemWell, I wish you all a productive time adhering to formal logic in all discussions in the future.
Oh…. That’s not going to happen. I just saw the post on FB and thought to myself “let the shit disturbing begin!”Well, I wish you all a productive time adhering to formal logic in all discussions in the future.
"The real opposition is the media. And the way to deal with them is to flood the zone with shit." - Steve BannonI would like to add another one:
Thou shalt not Gish Gallop (present a mountain of untested and unproven arguments in rapid succession in an attempt to overwhelm your opponent, giving them no time to respond)
This is the one that pisses me off the most.
Is Gish Galloping even a logical fallacy?I would like to add another one:
Thou shalt not Gish Gallop (present a mountain of untested and unproven arguments in rapid succession in an attempt to overwhelm your opponent, giving them no time to respond)
This is the one that pisses me off the most.
Very true, but it's presented as logic. "The other guy couldn't address my points, therefore I won the argument!"Is Gish Galloping even a logical fallacy?
I think of it more as a rhetorical tactic. (A super shitty one, of course.)
Shapiro's famous for it.Very true, but it's presented as logic. "The other guy couldn't address my points, therefore I won the argument!"
Ben Shapiro does this all the time.
What are you going on about now?!?!Shapiro's famous for it.
But that's also an excellent example of my point.
The Gish Gallop is a rhetorical tactic that involves wasting time and then blaming the other person for not using proper logical argumentation to refute each point.
It cannot be countered effectively with logic.
It then becomes a victory over himself. Thus a defeatVery true, but it's presented as logic. "The other guy couldn't address my points, therefore I won the argument!"
Ben Shapiro does this all the time.
The Gish Gallop.What are you going on about now?!?!
(Let’s see if he has a logical comeback to that)