Thank you Alberta

[harryass]

Alberta to send PPE to Ontario, Quebec and B.C.

https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/alberta-to-send-ppe-to-ontario-quebec-and-b-c-1.4892347

The province says the equipment will breakdown down as follows.
Ontario will receive:
250,000 N95 masks
2.5 million procedural masks
15 million gloves
87,000 goggles
50 ventilators

Quebec will receive:
250,000 N95 masks
2 million procedural masks
15 million gloves

British Columbia will receive:
250,000 N95 masks

 

[Darts]

A Conservative government with the foresight to stock up in December 2019and now helping out the rest of Canada. Kudos.:encouragement:

 

[shack]

A Conservative government with the foresight to stock up in December 2019and now helping out the rest of Canada. Kudos.:encouragement:

Unlike trump. A right wing leader who washes his hands of any responsibility, did not properly prepare despite warnings in early January and doesn't mind if the states have to fend for themselves bid against each other for supplies.:doh:

Good job by Alberta

 

[Gooseifur]

Unlike trump. A right wing leader who washes his hands of any responsibility, did not properly prepare despite warnings in early January and doesn't mind if the states have to fend for themselves bid against each other for supplies.:doh:

Good job by Alberta

Whataboutism shack. I love it!. You also brought Trump into an Alberta thread, Bravo!

 

[shack]

Whataboutism shack. I love it!. You also brought Trump into an Alberta thread, Bravo!

I was fully aware when posting it. One slight difference is that I did not do it to deflect criticism or as an excuse or to avoid discussing something, like the righties do when trump does something and you have no other defense. Regardless, as I said, I knew what I was posting. Interestingly, you NEVER admit to "w"ism when you get accused. I don't expect you to understand the difference.

Actually, I did it to point out how the poster felt the need to promote a right of centre gov't. If he had not felt the need to add in a "Conservative government" I would not have responded as I did and would have just given credit, like I did. There was no need to politicize that post and blatantly try to score points, so if that is the tactic, what's good for the goose (no pun intended) is good for the gander. That is all I did. Will you criticize him for trying to score political points when it is not a political matter?

And if that doesn't register (again, I expect it won't), look at it this way I am afflicted with TDS. I can't help myself. Deal with it. Actually, I'd prefer if you could understand and maybe even accept my above explanations. My response was justified in light of what was posted.

 

[Medman52]

Whataboutism shack. I love it!. You also brought Trump into an Alberta thread, Bravo!

I would bet good money he’s so obsessed with The Donald he masturbates daily looking at Trumps beautiful head of hair.

Terb is his beard.

 

[shack]

I would bet good money he’s so obsessed with The Donald he masturbates daily looking at Trumps beautiful head of hair.

Terb is his beard.

A valuable, informative contribution. The max you are capable of is a vulgar insult. Sad.

 

[Insidious Von]

Rachel Notley deserves some of the credit for the current stockpile, she wasn't given enough time to diversify Alberta's economy.

Had they the time, I seriously doubt that the Alberta Conservatives would have so egalitarian. I just don't see them producing such a surplus in 1.5 years.

 

[Medman52]

A valuable, informative contribution. The max you are capable of is a vulgar insult. Sad.

Don’t be sad, the truth shall set you free. You are correct though, masturbating while looking at Trump’s beautiful wavy hair is vulgar, but we’re very open minded here, do not fret you are amongst friends. I would suggest you work on your obsession, I would think it’s a tad unhealthy. We won’t judge you like the leftist Demorats would. You’re safe here.

 

[shack]

The max you are capable of is a vulgar insult. Sad.

Don’t be sad, the truth shall set you free. You are correct though, masturbating while looking at Trump’s beautiful wavy hair is vulgar, but we’re very open minded here, do not fret you are amongst friends. I would suggest you work on your obsession, I would think it’s a tad unhealthy. We won’t judge you like the leftist Demorats would. You’re safe here.

Thanks for proving my point. Insults is all you've got.

I can understand if you don't like my posts. Deal with it.

 

[Medman52]

Thanks for proving my point. Insults is all you've got.

Trust the truth. Don’t be ashamed. There’s help if you need it.

Just make sure to wash your hands and clean off your screen.

 

[Gooseifur]

I was fully aware when posting it. One slight difference is that I did not do it to deflect criticism or as an excuse or to avoid discussing something, like the righties do when trump does something and you have no other defense. Regardless, as I said, I knew what I was posting. Interestingly, you NEVER admit to "w"ism when you get accused. I don't expect you to understand the difference.

Actually, I did it to point out how the poster felt the need to promote a right of centre gov't. If he had not felt the need to add in a "Conservative government" I would not have responded as I did and would have just given credit, like I did. There was no need to politicize that post and blatantly try to score points, so if that is the tactic, what's good for the goose (no pun intended) is good for the gander. That is all I did. Will you criticize him for trying to score political points when it is not a political matter?

And if that doesn't register (again, I expect it won't), look at it this way I am afflicted with TDS. I can't help myself. Deal with it. Actually, I'd prefer if you could understand and maybe even accept my above explanations. My response was justified in light of what was posted.

Ya because it gets under your skin when anything on the right is given credit. I don't have a problem with whataboutism. I never said anything about it until you criticized me for it, then I realized you do it just as much as anyone else except you call people out for doing it. Why is it ok for you to do it but not anyone else.

 

[Medman52]

Why is it ok for you to do it but not anyone else.

Donald J. Trump gives him an erection. There’s really nothing wrong with that.

We should be encouraging people like him. It’s ok Schick. Don’t let him get under your Trump obsession.

As long as you wash your hands afterwards, it’s all good.

 

[shack]

The max you are capable of is a vulgar insult. Sad.

I would bet good money he’s so obsessed with The Donald he masturbates daily looking at Trumps beautiful head of hair.

Terb is his beard.

Don’t be sad, the truth shall set you free. You are correct though, masturbating while looking at Trump’s beautiful wavy hair is vulgar, but we’re very open minded here, do not fret you are amongst friends. I would suggest you work on your obsession, I would think it’s a tad unhealthy. We won’t judge you like the leftist Demorats would. You’re safe here.

Donald J. Trump gives him an erection. There’s really nothing wrong with that.

We should be encouraging people like him. It’s ok Schick. Don’t let him get under your Trump obsession.

As long as you wash your hands afterwards, it’s all good.

Knock yourself out.

 

[shack]

Ya because it gets under your skin when anything on the right is given credit. I don't have a problem with whataboutism. I never said anything about it until you criticized me for it, then I realized you do it just as much as anyone else except you call people out for doing it. Why is it ok for you to do it but not anyone else.

You called me on it and I admitted it was "w"ism. Which is more than you've ever done.

I don't see a comment on the unnecessary "Conservative gov't" reference.

 

[onthebottom]

With WCS at $7.36 they probably needed the money....

 

[Darts]

Looks like Medman and Gooseifur chased Shack away.

 

[shack]

Looks like Medman and Gooseifur chased Shack away.

Not that they did, but something you can't do.

You are the king of running away. Actually you are in fetal position. Please answer.

"Since tennis is a non-contact sport, Bianca's injury is most likely due to overtraining" was your assertion. Since all other tennis players are playing the same non-contact sport, it would be logical to conclude that injuries sustained by all tennis players were most likely caused by overtraining. Is that your assertion?

In fact any injuries sustained by athletes in other non-contact sports are "most likely due to overtraining". Swimmers, gymnasts, track and field, skiers, weight lifters. Do you agree with that statement because very many of them get injured in their non-contact sports.

 

[Medman52]

I have no idea where the Trump obsession went but it’s FABULOUS not seeing anymore circle jerk propaganda!

Terb is enjoyable again!

LOVE LOVE LOVE Ignore!!! LOVE it!