Teslas are Getting Set On Fire Around America
- Thread starter glamphotographer
- Start date
Newsflash. Biden isn't the president anymore and neither is your boy JT
Yup, Biden is too old and backed genocide.
Trump is only 4 years younger and is backing genocide, and he's way more unhealthy.
Salon has a good article on how Musk and a few other techno bro billionaires want to establish 'freedom cities' where laws don't apply and businesses can treat workers like peasants and serfs.
"Cities without democracy": The dystopian dream fueling Musk
Tech's plans for billionaire-rule expose why Musk wants to end government by the people
www.salon.com
What aisles r u guz in?
We can't dispatch the aisle de-soiling squad if we don't know where u guyz are.
For the love of humanity, tell us your aisle #s
Answer the question....Are acts of violence justified here?...It's a simple yes or no.
Yes, he is a non elected, non appointed oligarch who is attempting to dismantle the social safety net of the USA, as well as the checks on oligarchs from achieving too much power. He is anti democracy, and is in it to privatize everything with him and a few others in charge.
When people rise up like this it isn't to be terrorists, it's to fight tyranny..
Your turn, we're the perpetrators of the Boston Tea Party wrong?
How does one commit an act of violence on an inanimate object?
They keep testing what they can get away with.
Trump's wanted to have protesters shot for a while, from all accounts.
It may well.
But it still doesn't serve people well to link the two, since the point of doing that is to make the boycott and general protests illegal.
If you're in a street fight with a thug, it doesn't serve you well to believe headbutting, eye gouging,
kicking in the balls is dirty fighting while the other guy is ready to slit your throat.
Which we saw coming.
From what I understand, them saying that doesn't really count. Kind of.
There is no federal "domestic terrorism" law.
They can add terrorism counts to other crimes.
It's messy.
This is something that does have to be considered.
Especially if you think the idea is to crack down on the protesters in general, then creating an incident to point to that you then use as a guilt by association is a possibility.
There are no rules.
Being forced to operate within a legal system that is intended to render you impotent serves only one side.
Still not sure how that addresses my point.
Or do you also think that there is no difference between the people who are protesting and boycotting and the people who are committing arson?
If the government won't abide by its own laws why should the people?
