Tesla stock drops by 50% in three months

[Skoob]

I was just called a rightie a couple of days ago.

Does that mean you're a Political-Bi?

 

[Skoob]

I only commented on you.

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh....a little tap dance to avoid the point and not have to actually state your stance on it because that would just show your hypocrisy.
Gotcha.

 

[boobtoucher]

Thanks for proving you know nothing about history but I could guess that already.

Weird how you didn't answer any of my questions, but claimed victory anyway.

Have you heard the term Pigeon Chess? Because you're great at it.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Terrorism by definition:
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

And that is not happening.
Firstly, no civilians are dead in these protests.
Some Teslas are. But they are cars, not people.
What is happening are protests some of which got out of control.
The protestors are not the left, do not represent the left, or even self identify as such.
They are people of all stripes who are protesting because Elon is putting his hands on their social security cheques amongst other things.
Some of which got out of control because of the current administration's and Elon's "Let them eat cake" mentality and actions.
So it is vandalism, which is a crime even if it was inevitable.
But it is not terrorism.
I get it though.
The tried and tested right wing tactic of using "law and order" to suppress dissent.
Unfortunately for you that only works when the administration's actions are not impacting millions of people who voted for them.
So no amount of mental gymnastics will help.

 

[SchlongConery]

Except those condoning acts of domestic terrorism and laughing at someone's personal business being negatively impacted as a result and then making fun of the company's stock price dropping.

 

[Leimonis]

And that is not happening.
Firstly, no civilians are dead in these protests.
Some Teslas are. But they are cars, not people.
What is happening are protests some of which got out of control.
The protestors are not the left, do not represent the left, or even self identify as such.
They are people of all stripes who are protesting because Elon is putting his hands on their social security cheques amongst other things.
Some of which got out of control because of the current administration's and Elon's "Let them eat cake" mentality and actions.
So it is vandalism, which is a crime even if it was inevitable.
But it is not terrorism.

In fairness, both sides are hypocritical. The right are happy to have a felon as a leader and the left would be happy if he was shot by a sniper

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

In fairness, both sides are hypocritical. The right are happy to have a felon as a leader and the left would be happy if he was shot by a sniper

Yeah but only one of that is reality.
The other a thought crime.

 

[Leimonis]

Yeah but only one of that is reality.
The other a thought crime.

Well, it’s not like most Trump supporters are benefitting from the reality. For them it’s also like a dream.
You know what they say: Trump supporters consist of two types: idiots and multimillionaires. Check your bank account to see which category you are in.

 

[SchlongConery]

Does that mean you're a Political-Bi?

Does fawning over Trump (who is not in any way a true Conservative) with such uncontrollable passion make you a homo?

 

[Skoob]

Weird how you didn't answer any of my questions, but claimed victory anyway.

Have you heard the term Pigeon Chess? Because you're great at it.

Says the guy who responded with a poem and then made snide remarks thinking he was clever.

I shared an article.
You didn't come back with anything of substance to critique the article.
You just did the leftist thing of attacking someone who may not share the same opinion.

...and that's why you lost the election. Lol!

But keep it up...works for me.

 

[Skoob]

And that is not happening.
Firstly, no civilians are dead in these protests.
Some Teslas are. But they are cars, not people.
What is happening are protests some of which got out of control.
The protestors are not the left, do not represent the left, or even self identify as such.
They are people of all stripes who are protesting because Elon is putting his hands on their social security cheques amongst other things.
Some of which got out of control because of the current administration's and Elon's "Let them eat cake" mentality and actions.
So it is vandalism, which is a crime even if it was inevitable.
But it is not terrorism.
I get it though.
The tried and tested right wing tactic of using "law and order" to suppress dissent.
Unfortunately for you that only works when the administration's actions are not impacting millions of people who voted for them.
So no amount of mental gymnastics will help.

Did the definition say anything about terrorism having to include people being dead? No.

Or do you prefer the term "domestic terrorism":

The federal government defines domestic terrorism (DT) as ideologically driven crimes committed by individuals in the United States that are intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy or conduct of a government.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47885



Read the definition again so you don't sound like this guy...

 

[Skoob]

View attachment 424145

Well, well, well, if it isn't someone not accepting their own hypocrisy. Must be terrifying.

 

[Skoob]

Does fawning over Trump (who is not in any way a true Conservative) with such uncontrollable passion make you a homo?

My passion doesn't come directly from Trump...it comes from watching liberals cry and choking on their own hypocrisy. Trump is just the instrument that makes that happen.

Does that clear things up for you? Feel better?

Can you hold it together for 4 more years (or maybe 8 if we're lucky)?

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Did the definition say anything about terrorism having to include people being dead? No.

There is no violence against civilians.
There is no coercion of anyone.
There is no intimidation of anyone.
There is no specific policy demand.
There is no specific ideology being espoused via these vandalisms.
Thanks for providing a definition and proving that these are not acts of terrorism.

 

[boobtoucher]

Says the guy who responded with a poem and then made snide remarks thinking he was clever.

I shared an article.
You didn't come back with anything of substance to critique the article.
You just did the leftist thing of attacking someone who may not share the same opinion.

...and that's why you lost the election. Lol!

But keep it up...works for me.

Sorry if I missed it,but I don't see an article supporting your statement that fascism comes from the left.

And which election did i lose? You realize I'm candian, right?

 

[Valcazar]

I do enjoy witnessing the leftists around here shy away from condemning acts of terrorism when they are done to people they just don't like. But I digress.

You're losing your argument with Shaquille Oatmeal, but go on.

The left has been involved in sabotaging someone they didn't like well before they were in power...what we are witnessing now is the emotional meltdown of not getting their way despite all the tactics they employed. Everything is magnified but most people see through the usual tactics. They don't work any more as proven by the outcome of the election.

Let it out.

I don't downplay violations...there are bound to be some when taking on such a lofty goal of deporting violent criminals that are in the country illegally. Violations occurred before Trump so you can stop clutching your pearls.

"Can't make an omelette without breaking eggs" eh?
Cute.
Dumb.
But cute.

Just a question for clarity, though.
Are they supposed to try and *fix* the violations?
Or is it "Look, we are doing God's work here, we can do whatever the fuck we want, loser"?

Besides, Trump wouldn't put kids in cages like Obama did. Remember that one? The outrage when the left thought the photos were from Trump's era...then crickets when it was determined they were from Obama's? Lol! Prime example of the typical leftist hypocrisy.

Trump did put kids in cages.
His family separation policy was cruel and obscene.

This is what is difficult to read with you sometimes.
Are you in favor of Trump's lawlessness and cruelty or are your deluded and think it isn't happening/didn't happen?

 

[Skoob]

There is no violence against civilians.
There is no coercion of anyone.
There is no intimidation of anyone.
There is no specific policy demand.
There is no specific ideology being espoused via these vandalisms.
Thanks for providing a definition and proving that these are not acts of terrorism.

There is no violence against civilians. >>>>>>>>people shooting into dealerships is violence against civilians...just because no one has been killed yet doesn't matter
There is no coercion of anyone.>>>>>>>>>>>>>vandalizing people's vehicles so that they don't drive them is coercion
There is no intimidation of anyone.>>>>>>>>>>shooting at dealerships and setting cars on fire intimidates people from going to that place of business
There is no specific policy demand.>>>>>>>>>>they are demanding the DOGE stop doing what it's doing
There is no specific ideology being espoused via these vandalisms.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the ideology that the left pushes to their supporters to fuel fears that the right is trying to harm them

Thanks for providing and proving that you are unwilling to admit your hypocrisy and continue to support acts of terrorism just so you can continue with your narrative.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

There is no violence against civilians. >>>>>>>>people shooting into dealerships is violence against civilians...just because no one has been killed yet doesn't matter
There is no coercion of anyone.>>>>>>>>>>>>>vandalizing people's vehicles so that they don't drive them is coercion
There is no intimidation of anyone.>>>>>>>>>>shooting at dealerships and setting cars on fire intimidates people from going to that place of business
There is no specific policy demand.>>>>>>>>>>they are demanding the DOGE stop doing what it's doing
There is no specific ideology being espoused via these vandalisms.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the ideology that the left pushes to their supporters to fuel fears that the right is trying to harm them

Thanks for providing and proving that you are unwilling to admit your hypocrisy and continue to support acts of terrorism just so you can continue with your narrative.

Yeah if you engaged in your Olympic level mental gymnastics, those things would be true.
However, for those of us with some common sense, protests and vandalism are not domestic terrorism.
Protests are legal and vandalism is just crime.

 

[Skoob]

Sorry if I missed it,but I don't see an article supporting your statement that fascism comes from the left.

And which election did i lose? You realize I'm candian, right?

The article I shared...try and keep up. I guess that's what happens when you just want to go on the attack...you miss some important details.

Ohhhhhh....is it elbows up or hands up?

 

[Skoob]

Yeah if you engaged in your Olympic level mental gymnastics, those things would be true.
However, for those of us with some common sense, protests and vandalism are not domestic terrorism.
Protests are legal and vandalism is just crime.

I've lost count of how many ways you have found to swallow your hypocrisy.

You must love the taste!

But I do admit, watching someone tap dance around their hypocrisy is very entertaining.