Terrorist Rams Barricades Outside British Parliament
- Thread starter Zaibetter
- Start date
Why "crazy shit disturber"? Why not a regular shit distruber?
Oagre just showing how much he loves labeling and stigmazing one community while hypocritically fight for another.
Really wonder why he seems to hate those in the mental health community so much?
Yes. The Incel attack should have been considered a terrorist attack. He was Christian and he was fighting for his Incel movement. He did mass damage with a purposeful intent in the name of deprived sexual men.
I have been saying this for a while now. Maybe if we relabel what terrorism is, then Muslims wouldn't have a monopoly and everytime someone does some sort of mass killing, people won't jump on the Islamic bigotry.
But nope - better to only call Muslim related attacks as terrorist ones. Keeps the masses fighting amoung themselves.
Well if you want him to ignore you, just keep calling him out for that behaviour.
After he has called you a bigot but then couldn't because you were not talking about Muslims and then after he tells you a thread about why an attacked happen is not the place to advocate for the mental health community he is throwing under the bus in the very same thread and when that fails and he tries to tell you he is not a mentalist because he represents people in court with mental illness - and you point out all the racists who " have a black friend" - he will then chicken out, back down and out you on ignore.
To be honest, I thought being a lawyer he would be able to argue better. I mean to be taken to cleaners on this by a part time hooker is pretty telling about his ability to litigate, no?
Because if we understand the motivation and support behind a mass murder we can try to prevent it happening again.
KK
Another terrorist attack in Spain this morning:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/0...t-dead-incident-treated-as-terror-attack.html
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/0...t-dead-incident-treated-as-terror-attack.html
And of course you'd be wrong (again): http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ives-court-car-attack-outside-Parliament.html
Soon enough the libtard terrorist apologists will come and try to explain to you that this is just another case of depression, despite the incident is being treated as a terror attack.
I have an alternative explanation for you, hoping you have an open mind.
Oagre was trying to make the point 4 days ago, that we had very little information on which to judge any facts of this story. We didn't know his religion or name, had a shallow description and a rumoured islamic statement he made. Yet several people in this thread jumped to conclusions, people find the need to push their usual Islamic terrorist narrative (which might be proven true, but not the point). Reasoning people wait for facts and not jump to conclusions.
Khater was know to local police and not MI5. This implies Khater was not on any gov't watch list for radicalism, association with terror groups or association with other people of interest. Because he was known to local police but has never served time or been charged, this implies he's either a ongoing petty problem or associated with others who are ongoing problems. I did google, no mention of jail time or charges (yet). So whatever makes him known to local police can't be too serious.
My point: With this context in mind, "crazy shit disturber" may mean: unexplainable / irrational / illogical trouble maker. Why did you assume he was referring to mental illness? For example I believe BB trolls are crazy shit disturbers. I have no idea why they do it other than a weird desire to get a reaction out of people. I find their actions irrational / illogical, but not mentally ill. Oagre further states "We don't yet know what this guy is all about. Road rage, incel, mentally unstable and terrorist are all possibles." <-- this is an open minded, wait for the facts point of view.
When you take constant cheap little shots like this, you make it about yourself. Since you've returned from your banning, you've attacked at least 4 Terbites that I've seen.
You've not-so-subtly trolled Oagre at least 4 times in this thread, fortunately he's not easily baited:
Fingers-crossed.
Telling someone he's wrong is not trolling.
And you need to mind your own business and let oagre speak for himself
Yet you were the one who injected himself into the conversation between Oagre and Aardvark (#17), then between Oagre and Jessica Rain (#44) and then with Zaibetter (#49). Point of fact: you were harassing Oagre in almost every one of your posts and you contributed nothing to the thread.
Phil you don't get to tell people when then they can and can't post.
It is trolling when it includes cheap shots and personal attacks. Besides you were actually wrong in every case.
It is trolling when you follow certain members around Terb and attack them every chance you get.
#MelaniaTrump #BeBest You could learn from her campaign.
Salih Khater, of Birmingham, is facing two counts of attempted murder, following the alleged attack in Westminster last Tuesday.
The 29-year-old Sudanese-born suspect, who is a British citizen, is accused of deliberately driving his Ford Fiesta into pedestrians and cyclists before swerving towards police officers.
At Westminster Magistrates Court today, prosecutor Samuel Main said: 'His choice of Parliament being an iconic national site and attempting to kill police officers guarding the Palace of Westminster suggests that he was trying to make a political statement.
'The Crown is therefore treating this case as terrorism.'
Actually Phil, this is the only statement that the (notoriously inaccurate and sensationalist) Mail made about motive. It adds nothing to what we knew some days ago. The words "suggests that he was trying to make a political statement" means that the Brits still haven't figured out why the accused did what he did. They suggest that he's telling the cops to go fuck themselves and keeping his motive between himself and his defence attorney.
That the British police are essentially guessing what the motive was still leaves it entirely open. If that's your "proof" the guy is an ISIS jihadi, it falls far short.
Leaving aside that he invaded an entire police station and threatened a police detachment of cops armed with guns with a "large knife"? Sounds like suicide by cop rather than a genuine terror attack.
Even assuming the guy was not psychotic or disturbed when the incident occurred?
You really aren't very bright are you? Just three post above: "When you take constant cheap little shots like this, you make it about yourself."
As usual, you weren't able to rebutt any of my points. Have another drink Phil.
Now who's taking cheap shots??
The topic is terrorism, Promo.
Not your growing, creepy obsession with me
