Non-sequitur.Really thou...why does anybody give a fuck what Martina says about anything?
Post #72, Bucktee said:You misunderstand.
You pointed people to Ladyballers, which is fucking terrible.
Why do you hate everyone here?
![]()
The Lady Ballers link is in reply to this post, and he gave me a Like.Who wins, D1 women's hoopers or out of shape men that played high school ball back in the day?
Because when it comes to women's sports through her experience at the highest level she's an authority.Really thou...why does anybody give a fuck what Martina says about anything?
Rotten Tomatoes gathers its audience data primarily through user reviews and ratings on their website. Additionally, they offer a "Verified Audience Score" which includes ratings and reviews from users who have purchased tickets to a film through FandangoThe audience who watched that is self-selected.
I put the smiley face to show it isn't an attack on you.Post #72, Bucktee said:
The Lady Ballers link is in reply to this post, and he gave me a Like.
I don't know where you get hate from this. Just because people don't share YOUR opinions doesn't empirically mean that they 'think wrong'.
I think you should explain the smiley face emoticon at the end of your post, (you used it in #85 and #87). I've never considered you to be funny, (at least, not in the humourous sense), and I may be misinterpreting your intent, but this comes across as passive-aggressive 'small dick' stuff, similar to the guy who says 'Hey asshole. Just kidding'.
I said "the right doesn't care about women's sports".
None of which contradicts my point about it being a self-selected audience, but rather reinforces it.Rotten Tomatoes gathers its audience data primarily through user reviews and ratings on their website. Additionally, they offer a "Verified Audience Score" which includes ratings and reviews from users who have purchased tickets to a film through Fandango
It's nice for you to be so confidently wrong.Clearly your post is incorrect and why do I get the feeling that just like your opinions a few years ago on Joe Rogan
You have never watched the movie.
You know, the more I read these threads the more they fell like the desperate cries of someone trying to not come out of the closet.Rotten Tomatoes gathers its audience data primarily through user reviews and ratings on their website. Additionally, they offer a "Verified Audience Score" which includes ratings and reviews from users who have purchased tickets to a film through Fandango
Clearly your post is incorrect and why do I get the feeling that just like your opinions a few years ago on Joe Rogan
You have never watched the movie.
This is an irrelevant observation.I said "the right doesn't care about women's sports".
I don't know why you think it hasn't been dealt with.This is an irrelevant observation.
One doesn't have to have kids or particularly enjoy the company of children to be vehemently opposed to paedophilia.
One reason why this trans-in-sport issue has not been taken seriously enough is because the largest demographic supporters of trans in all spaces are women... and most of these women have no interest in sports of any kind (male or female leagues). Sport and what is involved in sport competition isn't in their purview. So, the logic goes that because it doesn't directly impact most women, then who cares.
It's short-sighted and immoral.
What rules are those?I don't know why you think it hasn't been dealt with.
When it first became an issue rules were put in place, now its not a real thing anymore.
There are now rules about trans people in sports.
No idea since I don't know what you are trying to do.You know, the more I read these threads the more they fell like the desperate cries of someone trying to not come out of the closet.
(did I do that right, valcazar?)
On the contrary, it's very relevantThis is an irrelevant observation.
A bad analogy.One doesn't have to have kids or particularly enjoy the company of children to be vehemently opposed to paedophilia.
That's a take.One reason why this trans-in-sport issue has not been taken seriously enough is because the largest demographic in supporter of trans in all spaces are women... and most of these women have no interest in sports of any kind (male or female leagues). Sport and what is involved in sport competition isn't within their purview or life experience. Sport is little more than an abstract concept to them. Sport is merely a game of tag enjoyed by children and Neanderthal men. So, the logic goes that because it doesn't directly impact most women (and only impacts those moronic women that partake in sports), then who cares.
It's short-sighted, misguided, and immoral.
The whole pitch is NOT based on "protecting women's sports". It's about protecting women who happen to be playing in sports for women. The byproduct is that the integrity of women's sports is protected.On the contrary, it's very relevant
The whole pitch is based around "protecting women's sports" - a thing you don't actually care about.
My analogy is congruent. You just haven't followed it.A bad analogy.
If you say you are for protecting children from paedophilia, and pass laws about paedophilia, then your attitude about kids is irrelevant.
Your stated reason for what you are doing and what you are doing are congruent.
I'm pointing out that the "trans women in sports" thing is not you being congruent.
What part of the "take" is sexist?That's a take.
A fairly sexist take, but sure, it's one.
There is no implication. The argument is clear. Transwomen should not participate in women's sports because it negatively affects female athletes.Is the implication here that transwomen participating in women's sports affects men and that's why you find it important?
A bunch of different ones based on the sport in question.What rules are those?
Most leagues have some sort of rules now.What rules are those?