Based on your post, you obviously either didn't watch the video or drank too many beers while watching the video.I don't think squeezer really watched the video...the admittance of "pimping" in Andrew Tate's video was how he was making money off streaming webcam girls they are not really exchanging services with guys... As he explains it...these chicks he has chats with guys...they have a keyboard on screen, but Andrew and his brother are the ones conversing with the subscribers....girls are just there in their underwear or naked pretending to type on keyboard and gives subscribers the impression they are conversing with ladies...LoL... that's what Andrew admitted to "pimping"... Andrew Tate is a loudmouth who made his fame and fortune for acting tough (he must be...he was an mma fighteer) and act as if he's a gigolo...it is all a ploy to gain notoriety amongst Beta males....If you fall for his schtick...he makes money..if you don't...well...good on you for not falling for it...that's his whole scheme.. all in all...it wasn't evidence LoL...
If what squeezer posted is that long and we don't hear Andrew really admitted pimping minor ladies...IMO...Mandrill suffered from "premature evaluation"...
Try reading Jen's response and see if you can absorb it properly
Pimping is not only making girls have sex with men. Pimping is forcing someone to do something of a sexual nature and taking their money.
So when a girl makes 40k on the webcam (Tate bros talking to men is irrelevant the girls themselves were on the cams) and you force her to give you 36k of it - you are pimping
Last edited: