Another "typical Zionist"?But the people around him are using him.
Like Lutnick, this just gives him more to laugh about.
I was thinking that exactly, while watching CNN on the ceiling above me while I was in the dentist's chair.I'm waiting for him to insult the court so badly he loses those judges forever.
How fucked up is that country. An "impartial" court but they are card carrying members of a party? Supreme court/neutral justices should not be allowed to have any allegiance to any party. At least pretend to give the appearance of impartiality.I just saw a bit. He basically called them RINO'S and traitors. To what is supposed to be an impartial court that is a deadly insult. Hopefully he keeps it up on social media.
How much do you want to bet that he doesn't drop a few missiles? Whether it's an actual war or not depends on how Iran responds.How much do you wanna bet Trump doesnt start a war with Iran during his term??
Definition of war would be an ongoing conflict for 30 days or more.Define war. He just moved as much fire power as they did the last two Iraq wars. And just as importantly moved out civilians and families from the region. So unless this is the biggest all in bluff in history shots will be fired. Iran has already said no go to Israel's demands in talks
Yes I will.How much do you want to bet that he doesn't drop a few missiles? Whether it's an actual war or not depends on how Iran responds.
Will you take that bet? Didn't think so.
Three of them may have just proved they are.How fucked up is that country. An "impartial" court but they are card carrying members of a party? Supreme court/neutral justices should not be allowed to have any allegiance to any party. At least pretend to give the appearance of impartiality.
Nope. They don't have enough ammo to go thirty days imo. And Trump may just TACO. Either way he loses politically. At this point he may just try the same old fire a few honor shots routine. That's a TACO imo. Moving that much fire power and having them sit with a thumb up their asses is a real cowards move and bad bluff.Definition of war would be an ongoing conflict for 30 days or more.
Pinpoint strikes to take out more of Iran's nuclear facilities doesnt count, even if Iran fires back a few missiles.
Do we have a bet??
He might order some more airstrikes, but I highly doubt it will result in an all-out war.Nope. They don't have enough ammo to go thirty days imo. And Trump may just TACO. Either way he loses politically
The bigger issue is if Iran decides to unload its ballistic missiles into Israel. And drones into the fleet.He might order some more airstrikes, but I highly doubt it will result in an all-out war.
At least I hope not![]()
If he drops any missiles you lose the bet. Do we have a bet?Yes I will.
I say Trump might drop a few more missiles if Iran is still producing weapons grade uranium.
But it wont turn into a lengthy all-out war.
Do we have a bet??
What happened a few months ago when Israel/US dropped a few tactical bombs to "stop" Iran's nuclear ambitions??If he drops any missiles you lose the bet. Do we have a bet?
You made a claim that he wouldn't start a war. That is subjective. If he is the first to fire missiles he is the aggressor. That has the capability of starting a war. It depends if Iran fires back or not.
Will you bet that he doesn't fire missiles first?
That would be suicide for the Iranian mullahs, who are currently not very popular back homeThe bigger issue is if Iran decides to unload its ballistic missiles into Israel. And drones into the fleet
Irrelevant to what is happening now? In that case it didn't start a war. Does that guarantee that it won't start a war next time? Anytime missiles are dropped on another country it has the "potential" to start a war, DOES IT NOT? It only depends on how the other country acts.What happened a few months ago when Israel/US dropped a few tactical bombs to "stop" Iran's nuclear ambitions??
Did it result in an all-out war?? No, it didnt.
So the answer to your question is, no a few dropped missiles is not the same an all-out war
They want to kill them already. At this point if the USA goes in to try to take out those missiles its the precursor to taking them out anyway. Might as well fire them off.That would be suicide for the Iranian mullahs, who are currently not very popular back home
No, if course it doesnt guarantee that. Thats why I'm willing to bet you that it doesntIrrelevant to what is happening now? In that case it didn't start a war. Does that guarantee that it won't start a war next time?
Not completelyIt is out of trump's control if a war starts or not if he happens to fire the first missiles
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.Are you willing to bet that trump will not fire missiles into Iran before Iran fires on the US, including their ships at sea. If he fires first, it means that he's cool if a war does break out. If he fires first he can rightfully be considered a warmonger
So do we have a bet or not?? Make up your mindThey want to kill them already. At this point if the USA goes in to try to take out those missiles its the precursor to taking them out anyway. Might as well fire them off
Your parameters for definition of war don't cut it. In fact unless Congress DECLARES war it isn't actually a war. It's something else.So do we have a bet or not?? Make up your mind






