But you didn't do that.I think you are wrong. They are expressing an opinion on the report, I agree. And imo it's a valid one. But it doesn't constitute "muslim bashing " as Knuckle claimed as it's based on real Govt evidence. And a real threat. Pointing out the SOURCE of the threat, in this case an Ideology, is valid. One that the regular news tried to lessen.
You linked to an incident where right wing activists had burned Qurans and the Swedish government worried that it would provoke an escalation in reprisal.
Which, if this report in the OP exists, is something I am sure it talked about.
But the main headline and lede was about " the escalating terrorism threat facing Sweden, mainly emanating from Muslim migrants. According to the report, there has been a sharp increase in the number of migrants suspected of posing a terrorist or security threat", which isn't confirmed by the one incident you linked to. That is a year long appraisal. (And the SOURCE for the greater threat given here - a sharp increase in the number of migrants suspected of posing a terrorist or security threat" is not the same as the one in your articles, which claimed that the terror alert was raised because "The move reflects Swedish concerns that repeated Quran-burnings this year by a handful of anti-Islam activists have made the Scandinavian country a prime target for Islamic extremists."
Look, eventually the AP or whatever will report on this official Säpo report and things will be clearer and far less disputable.
We can wait.