Supreme Court striking down 1-year mandatory sentence for child porn possession
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
Yes, but would Chad's dad want to see Suzy in jail since she consented and both did the filming? Again, it's not illegal if it's two consenting minors, so both dads would be able to cry themselves to sleep and take away their kids' cell phones.
I mean, we are literally talking about two guys that got mandatory sentences and you are asking me how big a problem this is. You don't even know what you are saying.
Now they have grounds to appeal the decision and get a light sentence. Are you happy and fulfilled now?
This is the difference between you and I.
You're trying to be right. I'm trying to protect children. You're disgusting.
I think you are moving the goal posts. And minors can't consent. That's the point.
Beyond that that's like saying two kids are drunk driving and hit eachother, but if the parents say it's OK no charges should be laid.
It's about community standards.
Oh yeah. I've been an attorney for 30 years and neither me nor my buddies have ever heard of anything like that. So I call bullshit.You guys are so naive it's not even funny.
I've know people that have pulled money from family or a Home LOC to guarantee no jail time.
They appealed successfully, but they may not get lighter sentences. Depends on the judge.I mean, we are literally talking about two guys that got mandatory sentences and you are asking me how big a problem this is. You don't even know what you are saying.
Now they have grounds to appeal the decision and get a light sentence. Are you happy and fulfilled now?
Yeah, someone like you really gets the "inside information" about the justice system, right?
They can't?
So are you saying that minors who have sex are raping each other?
Make it make sense.
I never said I have "inside information". I told you what has exactly happened from what I've seen.Yeah, someone like you really gets the "inside information" about the justice system, right?
I expect a lawyer to have a bit more comprehension than this.
Again. It's about FILMING AND NUDE PICTURES.
And no, they absolutely can't legally consent to that.
I am trying to protect the innocent, you don't give a shit about justice. You don't give a shit that some of those caught up in injustice may have kids that will be harmed by injustice. i.e you are incapable of considering what is not in front of your face and the collateral effects. Typical conservative
Teens can absolutely do this consensually and they do this all the time.
It'd be silly to say they should spend time in jail for it.
You cannot treat adults and teens the same way.
In case you didn't notice yet, laws don't really apply to the super rich elites. Go on a boat ride off the coast of Venezuela and find out.
The reciever should immediately contact parents to stop it. No need for police involvement unless it's a bullying/harassment issue.
Again. It's about transferring. If they never send it then it's self photo. The minute you hit send it's porn.
So then you think teens should send nude photos without consequences?
The double standard is amazing. I guess you think those girls who killed the homeless man deserved no time either.
Again, it is not a matter of whether they should, but what those "consequences" should be.
Why a nude photo was sent, who sent it and to whom it was sent to matters.
Those need to be determined in a court and the guilty party should face consequences accordingly based on the merits of the case.
Not a blanket law that sends people to prison with no regard to their intent or circumstances.
What a ridiculous strawman.
Are you saying a swarming attack and murder of a homeless man is the same as sending a nude pic?
Make it make sense.
