Super Bowl predictions

Scenicdrive

New member
Jan 26, 2005
2,747
0
0
squash500 said:
I'll take the Steelers -7 . IMHO, the Steelers defence is just too good. They will have no trouble stopping Zona's potent offense!
Don't forget the power of 'the force'. Whichever team garnish it the most wins the game. May the force be with the underdog. :cool:
 

bigdik

as in " you are such a "
Feb 16, 2003
1,461
0
36
Wherever I shouldn't be
ckupets04 said:
I am guessing it will be Ike Taylor on Fitz with probably safety help over the top. Fitz does have a knack for making plays in double-coverage though as he did in the Atlanta and Carolina games. Philly had some busted coverages, I have no idea how he got matched up one-on-one with Quentin Demps on that one play.

Fitz hasn't taken a hit from Ryan Clark yet.;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyNy-TkDGB0

No, this isn't that hit.

Steelers play "Howie Meeker " D.
Always play the man.
 

bigdik

as in " you are such a "
Feb 16, 2003
1,461
0
36
Wherever I shouldn't be
ckupets04 said:
Thing is Zona's offense is more potent than the Ravens offense and yet the Ravens still were able to score two TDs on the Steelers in the championship game on the road. This game will be on a neutral field. But for sure special teams will be key , Zona can score points on PITT if they can get some short fields. Also Zona's offense is more capable of explosive plays than the Ravens offense.
They got those points off 2 big ST plays though, one of which was kinda freakish. I doubt Berger misses a punt like that again in his career.
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
bigdik said:
They got those points off 2 big ST plays though, one of which was kinda freakish. I doubt Berger misses a punt like that again in his career.
Oh I hear what your saying and also with the game being in Tampa , a warmer environment a bad punt becomes less likely but there are so many ways to make plays on special teams. Look at the Bolts/Colts game, that game was practically won by Mike Scifres. Granted, Sproles had a very good game but one could argue that Scifres single-footedly won that game for the Bolts. If Ben GRaham can pin the Steelers deep and the Cards D can force a 3 and out and get a decent punt return that could also lead to a short field. Also, even if Berger doesnt miss a punt like that, who knows maybe the Cards can block a punt like they did against the Cowboys in the regseason that led to the GW score. Thats the thing about STs there are so many plays to be made on STs within a game that it really cannot be overlooked and I think for the Cards to win the game they MUST win the STs battle.

The other thing I will be interested to see is how the Cards pass-pro schemes hold up. This is the first time in the post season they are playing a 3-4 defense and the Cards have had trouble against 3-4 defenses in the regular season. It will be a challenge to identify that 4th or 5th pass- rusher in passing situations.

I am looking for DRC to be an X-factor in this game. He has played well throughout the postseason and I think he can shutdown Santonio Holmes. A lot of the pressure may be on Heath Miller to move the sticks with Ward not at 100%.
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
bigdik said:
They got those points off 2 big ST plays though, one of which was kinda freakish. I doubt Berger misses a punt like that again in his career.
And also on my previous posts I had emphasized that STs plays will be very important in this game for Zona to get short fields. But I dont think its as critical for Zona as it was for Baltimore because Zona is capable of changing field position with one big play. Not only the deep ball to Fitz but also because their receivers are good YAC receivers. Its hard to dink and dunk your way down the field against the Steelers Defense but if you can have one big play that changes field position, even if you dont score points on the drive its key because it shifts field position.
 

lawyerman

Active member
Nov 24, 2005
3,844
1
38
I think it would be great if the Super Bowl was played in a colder climate. The head honchos of the NFL would never go for it.
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
lawyerman said:
I think it would be great if the Super Bowl was played in a colder climate. The head honchos of the NFL would never go for it.
That would be fantastic. I have always thought the same thing. I totally understand the rationale behind putting it in Tampa or Miami or Phoenix or Atlanta cause they want it to be a big party atmosphere and thats much easier done in a warmer climate. But Ive always thought the SB should bounce around from city to city, and it would be great to see a SB played in a cold weather city. From a competitive standpoint, its also unfair in the sense that Tampa keeps on having chances to get to the SB and play in their home stadium, but teams like Seattle or Philly or PITT never have that opportunity.

They did have it in Detroit a few years ago when PITT won it but obviously that was a controlled environment cause it was not an outdoor stadium.

I guess maybe the one advantage to having the SB in a warm weather city is that it allows both teams to play their best football. Defense travels so Defense can play in hot or cold weather but an offense that depends on timing and rhythm like the Cards offense or the Colts offense suffer in cold weather.
 

lawyerman

Active member
Nov 24, 2005
3,844
1
38
ckupets04 said:
That would be fantastic. I have always thought the same thing. I totally understand the rationale behind putting it in Tampa or Miami or Phoenix or Atlanta cause they want it to be a big party atmosphere and thats much easier done in a warmer climate. But Ive always thought the SB should bounce around from city to city, and it would be great to see a SB played in a cold weather city. From a competitive standpoint, its also unfair in the sense that Tampa keeps on having chances to get to the SB and play in their home stadium, but teams like Seattle or Philly or PITT never have that opportunity.

They did have it in Detroit a few years ago when PITT won it but obviously that was a controlled environment cause it was not an outdoor stadium.

I guess maybe the one advantage to having the SB in a warm weather city is that it allows both teams to play their best football. Defense travels so Defense can play in hot or cold weather but an offense that depends on timing and rhythm like the Cards offense or the Colts offense suffer in cold weather.
I understand why the game is played in a city with a warm climate or a climate controlled stadium but the real diehards would be at the game. It would probably be more of a party.
 

bigdik

as in " you are such a "
Feb 16, 2003
1,461
0
36
Wherever I shouldn't be
lawyerman said:
I understand why the game is played in a city with a warm climate or a climate controlled stadium but the real diehards would be at the game. It would probably be more of a party.
I've been to Grey Cups in Ottawa, Winnipeg and Regina. The party did not suffer.;)
 

mike0040

New member
Mar 11, 2004
23
0
0
Ive got the Cards at 7-1 odds prior to the Conference Championship, Go Cards!!!
I think both teams will put some points up, but a couple big plays will be the factor.
Cards 31 Steelers 28
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
lawyerman said:
I understand why the game is played in a city with a warm climate or a climate controlled stadium but the real diehards would be at the game. It would probably be more of a party.
Agreed. I am a bit of a purist and Ive always thought that the game was meant to be played in cold weather, cold weather is excellent hitting weather as John Madden always say.
 

mjg1

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2008
5,176
1,380
113
hans4u said:
Cardinals 29 Pittsburgh 24
You must be crazy, Pittsburgh in a easy win 31-17! Arizona offense is overrated, then again I thought the Eagles would beat them!
 

friendz4evr

Active member
Oct 16, 2002
1,434
10
38
The smart money is on the Steelers. OTH, the Cards may be a team of destiny. I'll go with the Cards.
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
friendz4evr said:
The smart money is on the Steelers. OTH, the Cards may be a team of destiny. I'll go with the Cards.
The reason why I'm NOT very good at predictions is cause I more than often pick the underdogs.

I'll go out on a limb and take the Cards with DRC winning MVP.
My guess is Todd Haley is gonna have Warner get the ball out quickly and put the pressure on the receivers to get yards after the catch. I expect a lot of 3-step drops from Warner and a lot of screen passes from the Cardinals early, if the screens are effective then that should slow down the Steelers blitz and once that happens then I think the Cards can try to take their shots downfield. I also expect the Cards to be very aggressive on STs in this game. Wouldnt surprise me to see the Cards block a Mitch Berger punt in this game.

The Cards however have had trouble against 3-4 defenses and lets remember that this is the first 3-4 defense they are facing in the postseason. ATL, CAR, and PHI all run 4-3 schemes.
 

Young_City

Resident Scumbag.
Feb 1, 2007
418
0
0
Tease Arizona and the under.
 

ckupets04

Active member
Dec 28, 2006
3,030
0
36
I am wondering how much the crowd might be a factor in this game, after all the crowd will be a pro-steelers crowd. Steelers fans travel maybe better than any other pro-sports team, certainly in football. Crowd noise could induce some Cardinal false starts or possibly delay of game penalties. Cards have got to avoid any type of negative plays cause its really hard to get out of 2nd and long or 3rd and long against the Steelers. And more often than not its those sitautions that the Steelers will create big defensive plays, INTs, forced fumbles, sacks, etc.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts