I have not Participated in the modern version of this. Before it became just another word for escorting It was a pleasure to be involved. Girls tend to be monogamous Or something near it. It was something totally different than what it is today.
Sugar Dating Experience
- Thread starter FunInToronto2023
- Start date
I have not Participated in the modern version of this. Before it became just another word for escorting It was a pleasure to be involved. Girls tend to be monogamous Or something near it. It was something totally different than what it is today.
Don't worry about it bud. She's been fucking men 2x-3x her age since her early 20's long ago when she started escorting and now she comes back online with her high and mighty attitude, makes these attacking comments to your post.
Thank I appreciate it, her comments were definitely misguided.
Can confirm that a prepaid card works provided you enter in an address to the card when registering it for online use. Though Reddit seems to think it is hit or miss on if it works, so take my luck with caution.
As for finding someone on there, it seems like things have gone down hill from when I was on there years ago. Seem to only find the $500+ ppm users. Also so many fake profiles or not in Canada. I've got another week left on my membership and I don't think I'll re-subscribe given how tough it's become. Could definitely use some advice in my DM.
As for finding someone on there, it seems like things have gone down hill from when I was on there years ago. Seem to only find the $500+ ppm users. Also so many fake profiles or not in Canada. I've got another week left on my membership and I don't think I'll re-subscribe given how tough it's become. Could definitely use some advice in my DM.
I found the same, which is why having a smoking hottie delivered to my door for 1hr for $350-ish is a way better value and far more efficient experience. I don't care to sit and have dinner and listen to them talk ?
See I actually would prefer to get to know someone and have something consistent but finding that has been super challenging compared to years back when within the first week I had found someone and had a great arrangement for 6 months
I did that for a while with a single mom. MILFs are awesome and she was exactly like that, kid focused most of the time but then the animal came out once a week. She used friends as babysitters and they knew exactly what they were doing it for. She was into being restrained and getting anal and we had sex in some public places. Great rack too. And all it ever cost me was the occasional meal out.Agreed, always play safe.
My best arrangement was with a 30 year old single mom who worked her ass off and wanted no part of the dating scene. It was all about her kid for her, which I thought was pretty cool TBH. However a girl has needs. The arrangement gave her some extra money to help with the house expenses, Christmas et…. and we were both getting laid once a week. (Wednesday nights was the kids dad‘s night) and she was more often than not horny as fuck.
She had no time for other guys so we were pretty much monogamous for about 5 months. Even then we always played safe, her BBBJ game was on point but intercourse was always covered. Did I trust her? Yes. But only 99 %.
This reminds me of when I was on Ashley Madison when it started 20 years ago. Yes there were fake profiles designed to squeeze money out of you but there were also lots of quality women on there and I soon realized from chatting with a few that their inbox was flooded with crazed messages from losers sending dick pics and who couldn't string a sentence together. Then there's me being patient, listening and writing well, and reasonably attractive when things got good enough to share pics. In those days they had visible feedback ratings on profile pages and mine were through the roof. Better than shooting fish in a barrel. They practically jump on deck. Reading all of these experiences is tempting me to get into this next step.
Sure. But you’re fooling yourself if you think it’s any kind of authentic connection. They are with you for the $.
I decided to conduct an experiment by setting up a fake profile on Seeking as a hot 22-year-old woman. I grabbed a photo off the internet and got started.
What I discovered was shocking.
I never sent any initial emails - I just waited to see who messaged me. I received about 20 messages every day.
Here's the shocking part. Almost all of the messages were lame; only one out of those 20 was enticing. This is what I received:
- About 50 percent said just one word: "Hey" or "Hello". Delete.
- Another 25 percent went like this: "Hello. You are so beautiful. We should get together. Here's my number. Are you free tonight?" Delete. We haven't had a conversation and you want me to meet you tonight? Do you think I have no life? Delete
- About 20 percent actually started a conversation. However, their photos were awful. If you are ugly and stand in front of a bright red sports car, it does not make you more attractive. If you are wearing a ratty t-shirt, it does not exactly convey that you are a successful man who can afford an SB. Delete.
- OK, so what about the remaining five percent? Yes, one message a day was from someone who could put a sentence together and had some decent photos.
Here's the lesson learned. Yes, there is competition out there. But you can compete if you put together a well-written profile with some photos that are not of you with no shirt or in front of your sports car. Send messages that are more than one line and that have some thought in them. Ideally, address something in her profile.
Good luck!
What I discovered was shocking.
I never sent any initial emails - I just waited to see who messaged me. I received about 20 messages every day.
Here's the shocking part. Almost all of the messages were lame; only one out of those 20 was enticing. This is what I received:
- About 50 percent said just one word: "Hey" or "Hello". Delete.
- Another 25 percent went like this: "Hello. You are so beautiful. We should get together. Here's my number. Are you free tonight?" Delete. We haven't had a conversation and you want me to meet you tonight? Do you think I have no life? Delete
- About 20 percent actually started a conversation. However, their photos were awful. If you are ugly and stand in front of a bright red sports car, it does not make you more attractive. If you are wearing a ratty t-shirt, it does not exactly convey that you are a successful man who can afford an SB. Delete.
- OK, so what about the remaining five percent? Yes, one message a day was from someone who could put a sentence together and had some decent photos.
Here's the lesson learned. Yes, there is competition out there. But you can compete if you put together a well-written profile with some photos that are not of you with no shirt or in front of your sports car. Send messages that are more than one line and that have some thought in them. Ideally, address something in her profile.
Good luck!
Totally messaged this account, we could’ve fucked last week. What a shame.
the problem is that there is only one or two agencies in toronto that can consistently do that
There can be an authentic connection even with money involved. It's female genetics to equate resources with love. Ineed, the most common question a cheated on wife or girlfriend will ask isn't "Do you love her" but "Did you spend money on her" which is their way of asking the first question. If you can feel something while paying for her date, she can feel something while receiving. She may even feel more because you do.
Yup. Yes, I believe I have an authentic connection with my SB. Many of you will claim that I am naive but it's there.
Sure, the money is important to her but it's not the only thing.
I was chatting with a friend who doesn't know about SA, but knows about Bumble. And he gets 2-3 girls at a time. Is completely open with them, and it's all FWB type of arrangements. Only difference is he's not paying them anything, except for the odd brunch out or something.
So the concept works regardless of the platform.
So the concept works regardless of the platform.
