bbking said:You should read the latest company report on the so-called new tech.
I have. I follow this one closely, because friends of mine have been "fleeced" by it, still hold disturbingly large positions, and want to talk about it incessantly.
bbking said:Something I have known for a long time - the tech is sound and works better than expected...
Of course... and I trust "Mining Engineer" is one of your many other accomplishments?
I've seen many, many juniors claim to have the "next best thing" in leeching/extraction technology, only for that to dissipate in a production environment (large, less controlled, processing massive amounts of ore), if it ever gets there - a defunct Lyon Lake, for example (LLL).
Moreover, the technology is not unique to Chesbar/Jaguar. What I mean by this is that if a new leeching technology would improve the economic feasibility for JNI, it would do so for any other mine site out there (it is not contingent on the geology of the Guatemalan property). So, relatively speaking, their competitive stature is not likely to be improved (i.e. still a "dud").
bbking said:...and the patents are all in place.
True, but for who? Last I heard, it wasn't JNI's technology, but a partner's.
bbking said:You might want to call this gambling - I refer to it as an educated quess. It something I have manage to do successfully on several unproven projects. I will say my position is less than 10% of my net-worth - so not gambling.
If it looks, smells and quacks like a duck....
I'm glad for your successes (if not mystified), but it is STILL gambling (regardless of how much of your money you are betting...). Much, much more can go disasterously wrong here than can go well.
bbking said:Anyways I did say that this was a long shot but one with the potential to move back to it's highs in the very near future.
You did... but you didn't say why. What will happen in the near horizon that people will suddenly get excited about a piece of dirt in Guatemala with a sparse amount of nickel in it?
bbking said:Time will tell if I'm right or your right
True.
bbking said:...to me this is not gambling but investing in a project, good people running the place,
Who? What exactly have "they" done? Took a gold exploration company... but when he didn't find gold, they decided that they should pick up a disgarded, uneconomical nickel property in Guatemala (of all places), and became a NICKEL exploration company. Then they changed the name (because everyone in the business knew that Chesbar was THE name in gold, and we wouldn't want to go around confusing people).
Oh yeah... and they just rewarded themselves with another batch of options to spread around the bankers and consultants. Good work, guys.
bbking said:.. the backing of Scotia Mcleod
Wha...? It's an investment bank... they sell product (both good and bad) to anyone who will buy it.... Inco is backed by bankers. Bre-X was backed by bankers.
If you evaluate an investment by the fact that a banker wants to sell it to you....
bbking said:...and reliable, trust worthy reports by the Company.
Well, we don't disagree there. Go back and look at their news releases. Mostly they say less than fantastic things about assay results, and the absurd costs that would likely be required to move ahead with a mining operation.
Everything else "reported" has been off the record, "casual talk" from those who would promote....
bbking said:I don't get to worried about people calling it gambling - My last succesfull shot in the dark was a Company that was using a new tech for cell phones - I saw advantages to that new tech. and bought that Company - Qualcom at 25.00US.
Congratulations again. Surely this experience directly translates to metallurgical insights that no one else can see....
bbking said:But I put my .02, told everyone I was ahead on the deal and where I thought it would go - you use faulty info to dismiss it that's your call - I really don't care I only put it out there for people to look at and make there own decission.
Well, I'm not using "faulty info" for anything, but I will admit that I don't consider it a sensible investment for any portfolio (even the gamblers can find better odds elsewhere, in my opinion). Like I said, I hope you ARE right (my friends will be very well off), but I've seen this too often to know better....
F.

