Do you really need noise cancelling? Bose is another brand that spends too much on marketing not enough on sound quality. Most noise cancelling units are a bit of a compromise of sound quality to achieve the noise cancelling.what about those bose noise-cancelling headphones?
It is a matter of opinion, Take a listen at Future shop or Best Buy on the Dr. Dre headphones. You will hear things that you go not hear on cheaper headphones. Sometimes when you hear a song that you listen to a million times you may not appreciate the changes that you have not heard before on the recording.Grrrr a bit off topic but as it was brought up.. Please don't buy Monster brand headphones (Dr. Dre, Bieber etc)... It's all marketing and looks vs real, balanced sound quality.
Listen to Senheiser or AKG(audiophiles have used them for years) to avoid the hype of Monster, Dr Dre etc.It is a matter of opinion, Take a listen at Future shop or Best Buy on the Dr. Dre headphones. You will hear things that you go not hear on cheaper headphones. Sometimes when you hear a song that you listen to a million times you may not appreciate the changes that you have not heard before on the recording.
Bose is not doing anything new. They use cheap drivers, and charge you a premium for the brand name. Here is a very good summary:
http://www.intellexual.net/bose.html
If you like it, be happy. They will be around for a long time . However, there is no doubt you could have gotten better sound for less money. I think their noise cancelling headphones are their best product, but even there I think there are better choices. To show I am not a total hater of Bose, I do have a set of 901s for my garage system that I rescued/rebuilt/refoamed . For the 200 bucks I put into them, they are good for washing the carFor in the house, so many better choices.
Bose is not doing anything new. They use cheap drivers, and charge you a premium for the brand name. Here is a very good summary:
http://www.intellexual.net/bose.html
If you like it, be happy. They will be around for a long time . However, there is no doubt you could have gotten better sound for less money. I think their noise cancelling headphones are their best product, but even there I think there are better choices. To show I am not a total hater of Bose, I do have a set of 901s for my garage system that I rescued/rebuilt/refoamed . For the 200 bucks I put into them, they are good for washing the carFor in the house, so many better choices.
What do you mean by "low quality power" besides being marketing speak for cable and power conditioning companies. The reason high end audio sells is for on reason only-expectation bias! It's more expensive so it must sound better. Besides, so called high end audio is lost on us over 25 who may not hear above 14k.I never understood this generality. If you feed great speakers low quality power they will sound bad, so imho the only way is to listen, you can get some outstanding speakers out there for far less than 1/2 the reciever or prepro+amp combo. Paradigm is one example, cambridge soundworks another, boston acoustics.
I had a visit from condo security because my neighbors thought that a $200 computer stereo (sub and speakers) was too loud.What do you mean by "low quality power" besides being marketing speak for cable and power conditioning companies. The reason high end audio sells is for on reason only-expectation bias! It's more expensive so it must sound better. Besides, so called high end audio is lost on us over 25 who may not hear above 14k.
Actually, a higher quality system your likely to get less complaints from.The reason you got the complaint is because the sub was designed to produce a large 80hz peak and very little below-it travels very well trough walls. If the bass was balance trough the 40-120hz range it would be a lot less annoying to the neighbors.I had a visit from condo security because my neighbors thought that a $200 computer stereo (sub and speakers) was too loud.
What's the point of investing in it if you cannot enjoy it.
As someone has already said, there's no need to spend $5000 for quality home equipment, especially if you are not an audiophile. I would recommend going to Executive Stereo, which was on Yonge St. near Davisville for a decade, and is about to reopen on Avenue Road near Wilson. I did some serious listening with two of their staff, and it was a delight: they know their stuff, and were the opposite of pushy. You could also try Hi-Fi-Fo-Fum, a high-end little shop on Mt. Pleasant north of Eglinton. Or go to Bay Bloor Radio on a weekday morning when it's quiet there.I'm not a audiophile. I just want a simple system for listening to CDs iPod etc
Perhaps one of those single unit systems ?
I want to spend < 5k.
Thanks for the input.
Yes ! my response was to the idea that I thought your were going down the snake oil road that modern high end audio is full of. I personally would still content that if extra money is spend, it's better to spend on speakers or even more important but almost always ignored, room acoustics.I guarantee you that a 1000.00 amp with 500.00 in room acoustic treatment will sound better than a 5000.00 amp with none.You are thinking of the wrong power, while the AC power can affect somethings - its not by any means a large contributor. However you should be using a high quality surge suppressor to protect your stuff. That cheap shit radioshack/walmart one is hardly good enough. Try Panamax or Furman.
As for the power I was talking about, that would be amplifier power. The sound quality varies extremely between different amps. You can feed a fantastic speaker crappy power and it will sound horrid. The power is crappy because of a number of factors ranging from current deliverd, to S/N ratio to distortion amplifier slew rate, damping factor etc.
And most separate amps are tremendously better sounding than the ones in a receiver.
a) You can get very good speakers for about 600, and for 600 you'll get a remarkably shitty receiver. (total 1200)
b) Lets try it at 1k, great speakers, very good amp (total 2k)
c) And at 2.5k high end speakers, and a top quality 2ch AMP (total 5k)
in b and c you spent the same on the speakers as the amp and both will sound far better than a.
you still need to buy a processor so tack on another 1 to 1.5k
So that 50% rule of thumb is obsolete, maybe 20 years ago that rule would be useful, but today its not, spend maybe 1/3 of your budget on speakers, and get an active sub, it will take a big load off your amps and speakers and give you a much better overall sound. Better yet forget these nonsense guidelines and go sit and listen to stuff. I recommend Kromer and Whitby Audio they have good listening rooms and a lot of content, you'll be amazed at what you hear if you come from the typical consumer grade electronics (sony, panasonic, denon etc)
also Check out Bryston (Canadian) and Sunfire Amps while you are out and about.





