I've been lucky to date but concerned about std's especially skin contact ones like herpes. How do you manage that risk? I try to start mish to get a look but maybe I'm fooling myself.
you might want to read up on STDs. A lot of them are not visible to some people. Its the risks you take being in the hobby and you should get tested regularly.I've been lucky to date but concerned about std's especially skin contact ones like herpes. How do you manage that risk? I try to start mish to get a look but maybe I'm fooling myself.
lol get a look? a big stamp on the pubic bone that says 'I have chlamydia'? If you're doing this shit, you better be prepared to deal with the fact that this might happen. That said, it's only happened to me once hobbying but several times doing the civilian thing (yes I was super promiscuous as a teen. no you're not 'shaming' me by pointing out i was an irresponsible dumb kid). Thankfully it was just chlamydia. I no longer feel bulletproof as an old man.I've been lucky to date but concerned about std's especially skin contact ones like herpes. How do you manage that risk? I try to start mish to get a look but maybe I'm fooling myself.
Just Chlamydia? Sheesh. Need to be careful. If you test negative and address only sleeping with one person and get it later , then you know you got it from your partnerlol get a look? a big stamp on the pubic bone that says 'I have chlamydia'? If you're doing this shit, you better be prepared to deal with the fact that this might happen. That said, it's only happened to me once hobbying but several times doing the civilian thing (yes I was super promiscuous as a teen. no you're not 'shaming' me by pointing out i was an irresponsible dumb kid). Thankfully it was just chlamydia. I no longer feel bulletproof as an old man.
What a bunch of BS. That was NEVER stated.a lot of gents thinking the STD risk is zero unfortunately.
My response was based on your saying, "...the risks of pussyslides as it is a hot topic here with a lot of gents thinking the STD risk is zero unfortunately." You say it is a hot topic HERE, so yes, that was never stated here. Many have said it was minimal and the ensuing discussion was about the degree of risk. All fair statements and a good discussion, but let's not exaggerate.Why are you so pissed off? I didn't say someone said it in this thread. You also quoted only part of my sentence, I was talking about pussyslides which was argued about from gents as having low risk to the same risk as DFK or BBBJ on the forum, AND i've had clients argue with me about this in person when they try it and think i should be fine with it. There's been some deletes to a few posts I noticed in this thread below, but the topic of pussyslides comes up often in this hobby with some arguing that vaginal contact with pre cum or genital to genital not being a concern like BBFS.
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?551293-Whats-this-called
It was never stated but it is always better to make it clear to those less informed.What a bunch of BS. That was NEVER stated.
Thanks for the Kudos, Cheekybacon.Chloe, I really appreciate your posting and info as it has confirmed a lot of my thinking. Keep up the good work - you are my sexpert!
I don't step outside of the Ottawa section often, so I haven't come across any other giant signatures. Thanks for resizing it -- even browsing from a laptop, it was taking up an entire page -- had nothing to do with the content itself, just the size of it. I don't know the advertising rules, but it's just courtesy, so thank you.I did upload it to a online photo reducer last week and it was reduced by 50%. I guess if I posted full nudes like some ladies in their signature it wouldn't be an issue to gents here? I have further reduced it... haven't seen any other ladies criticized for photos in their signatures that's all.






