If you insist on being lazy and/or thinking I'm making shit up like you, then here you go...Where is your source for this claim, skoob?
https://www.cp24.com/news/systemic-...for-helping-racialized-police-cheat-1.6879486
If you insist on being lazy and/or thinking I'm making shit up like you, then here you go...Where is your source for this claim, skoob?
Wrong.Because the TPS has a success rate of 1.7% for promotions of black officers.
Because she tried to get policy changed that other cops use to continue systematic racism, had it approved at the board, but someone above her cancelled it. So she acted as if that policy went through.
Can you prove that the cops she offered the questions to weren't cops she thought were the best candidates and that this was the best way to get cops past that 1.7% promotion rate?
He brought it up because of issues brought forward about community safety and relations with TPS and not due to TPS not hiring enough black officers.It is an example. It was such a glaring example that Tory of all people brought it up. It is undeniable that there are systemic issues at the TPS.
Moving goal posts?Excuses?
![]()
Toronto Police Admit Systemic Racism: Damning Statistics Show Police Targeting of Black Torontonians and Other Racialized Communities - Falconers LLP
Leading human rights and police accountability firm Falconers LLP responds to Toronto Police admission of systemic racism.falconers.ca
It wasn't a one time summary, according to the article, skoob.Wrong.
That 1.7% was a one-time summary when TPS had 58 applications from black candidates. It is not indicative of anything other than that single occurrence which could have been the case for a variety of reasons.
Stop spreading misinformation. It's proof you are out to lunch on this one and are desperately trying to make a race issue out of misconduct.
You don't think they are related?Moving goal posts?
Your article describes TPS's historical relationship with communities...it's not about hiring practices.
Moving goal posts?
Your article describes TPS's historical relationship with communities...it's not about hiring practices.
1.7% of black officers who applied for promotions were successful.And if so, what does that mean in absolute numbers?
Or, 1.7% is the percentage of new hires that are black?
It was a one-time summary based on when there were 58 black applicants.It wasn't a one time summary, according to the article, skoob.
You made that part up.
Your article suggests that Clarke may have thought the policy to allow everyone to see the questions in advance was passed.
The proposed solution that Clarke championed was a new procedure that involved providing everyone with questions in advance.
“It was based on feedback from 500 Toronto police officers, not 500 Black officers, who thought the promotional process was unfair,” said Audrey Campbell of the Jamaican Canadian Association, who has testified for Clarke.
The Toronto Police Service Board oversees the police service, and even though it adopted the new plan, the police service didn’t put it into practice, Adjetey testified.
“Before its implementation, the TPS made an executive decision without warning to suspend the new process and revert to the original, unfair practice that the members identified in the external review,” wrote Adjetey in a report entered into evidence.
“It stands to reason that had the TPS implemented the new promotional process, Supt. Clarke would not have felt the desperate need to flatten the playing field by providing Black officers with the interview questions,” he wrote.
It’s not clear why the policy was never adopted. A TPS spokesperson said that the service would not comment while the tribunal was under way, but said it would respond after its conclusion.
“It was fully accepted, and these officers truly believed it would be implemented. And someone along the way decided that they weren’t going to implement all of it,” Campbell said outside the hearing.
Ah yes, when your "numbers" fail and you fall on your face trying to peddle misleading information you pivot.You don't think they are related?
Like I said, you referenced a one-time occurrence, i.e. cherry picked, and then used that as the basis of your argument.No he didn't. And also, on the issue of community safety and relations, systemic racism will still impact it, when your hiring does not reflect demographics of the community you are policing.
Adjetey highlighted a 2021 Toronto Police Services Board meeting where then-mayor John Tory asked the service whether it had structured the promotion process in a way that disadvantaged Black candidates.
“Maybe ask the chief and the service to do a little bit more to look into this and to decide if there’s something wrong,” Tory said at the time, pointing to statistics that of a pool of 58 Black applicants, 13.7 per cent were interviewed, and 1.7 per cent were hired.
Adjetey said outside the hearing that favoured officers often got special treatment, and thanks to the makeup of the TPS’s senior staff, that broke down on racial lines
And over what time period were those applicants, skoob?It was a one-time summary based on when there were 58 black applicants.
Stop distracting and spreading misinformation.
I've been posting quotes from the articles you've posted, skoob.Ah yes, when your "numbers" fail and you fall on your face trying to peddle misleading information you pivot.
Stop spreading misinformation and making excuses for cheaters.
How do you know those 58 applicants weren't the sum total over 5 years, skoob?Like I said, you referenced a one-time occurrence, i.e. cherry picked, and then used that as the basis of your argument.
Stop making excuses and spreading misleading information.
She cheated and should be fired.
OMFG you can't even get the facts straight and then expect anyone to debate with you while you twist things to suit your narrative.1.7% of black officers who applied for promotions were successful.
58 black cops applied over who knows how long and only 1 was promoted.
Because it says "pool". A pool suggests a specific point in time when applications were being submitted/accepted.How do you know those 58 applicants weren't the sum total over 5 years, skoob?
yes you still try and twist the narrative and hide the fact that your 1.7% stat is out of context with this issue regarding a high ranking officer who cheated.I've been posting quotes from the articles you've posted, skoob.
You just didn't read them.
I am right, skoob.OMFG you can't even get the facts straight and then expect anyone to debate with you while you twist things to suit your narrative.
This particular stat was not about promotions. It was about applicants. ie people applying to join TPS.
58 applied
8 were interviewed
1 was hired
Stop spreading misinformation.
Why do you keep calling for a harsher punishment than the prosecutor, skoob?yes you still try and twist the narrative and hide the fact that your 1.7% stat is out of context with this issue regarding a high ranking officer who cheated.