Scientific method at its best....
With these contradictory reports obviously I will have to conduct more studies of the phenomenon myself.
Scientific method at its best....
With these contradictory reports obviously I will have to conduct more studies of the phenomenon myself.
Excellent, you can write Psychology Today and tell them the proof sited in their article is full of shit because you can't understand it.You are welcome, and now we have proof.
I'm of the age that an orgasm shorts my energy level down to near zero. Not only cannot I muster an immediate second squirt, I consider myself lucky if I don't loose consciousness. .But there are sometimes I can orgasm, a wave of euphoria does wash over me, then I can focus enough to squirt if it hasn't happened during my first climax, thus being completely voluntary.
I don't have to write anybody, the article definitively proving common sense, that it is indeed pee, has now been published and can be read by everyone, even the pseudoscience journalists at "Psychology Today".Excellent, you can write Psychology Today and tell them the proof sited in their article is full of shit because you can't understand it.
This is why having Fuji on ignore is great. You should try it. Really... you should.fuji posted a link from the internet it must right ! After all they tested an exhaustive sample of 7, you read correctly, 7 women. That should be your first clue as to scientific their methods were. Do a seach on the authors (none of them use Dr or MD) and see what you get. Put it down with the rest of the increasingly long list of things fuji is wrong on, although I can well imagine that he has never been with a women squirted.
I didn't know squirting was one of your many talents !!So why is mine clear and tastes salty compared to the taste of urine. There are studies and then there are studies. Analysis to death
All sputter, no content. In fact every time you have tried to debate anything with me you have lost badly, which is why you now sit there hurling this kind of slur instead of attempting any actual debate.fuji posted a link from the internet it must right ! After all they tested an exhaustive sample of 7, you read correctly, 7 women. That should be your first clue as to scientific their methods were. Do a seach on the authors (none of them use Dr or MD) and see what you get. Put it down with the rest of the increasingly long list of things fuji is wrong on, although I can well imagine that he has never been with a women squirted.
Agree. He does nothing more than subtly insult and intentionally create drama. Quite disrespectful from what I've seen. Very unnecessary.This is why having Fuji on ignore is great. You should try it. Really... you should.
Ditto.
Good points!fuji posted a link from the internet it must right ! After all they tested an exhaustive sample of 7, you read correctly, 7 women. That should be your first clue as to scientific their methods were. Do a seach on the authors (none of them use Dr or MD) and see what you get. Put it down with the rest of the increasingly long list of things fuji is wrong on, although I can well imagine that he has never been with a women squirted.
In your mind you think he has lost.All sputter, no content. In fact every time you have tried to debate anything with me you have lost badly, which is why you now sit there hurling this kind of slur instead of attempting any actual debate.
Wow. Can't believe that they (U.K.) are considering banning porn with squirting just because it might not be female ejaculate but pee. What fucking prudes.
This is not an opinion poll. Human biology isn't that different one person to the next. In seven women who squirt the liquid was proved to be pee.In your mind you think he has lost.
The point about 7 women in a study not being representative for statistical purposes is a valid one (I will check that link myself now).
Statistics isn't just for opinion polls.This is not an opinion poll. Human biology isn't that different one person to the next. In seven women who squirt the liquid was proved to be pee.
Which confirms common sense: no human gland can produce that volume of liquid that quickly, there is obviously a reservoir, and this study has confirmed what that reservoir is (pretty much the only thing it could ever have been).
Ha ha Iris.So from now on the " I almost squirted myself" is right instead of "I almost peed myself"?
or a doctor can ask a squirt sample instead of urine sample?