Squirting Is Just Peeing, Say Scientists

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
11,139
2,471
113
You are welcome, and now we have proof.
Excellent, you can write Psychology Today and tell them the proof sited in their article is full of shit because you can't understand it.

But there are sometimes I can orgasm, a wave of euphoria does wash over me, then I can focus enough to squirt if it hasn't happened during my first climax, thus being completely voluntary.
I'm of the age that an orgasm shorts my energy level down to near zero. Not only cannot I muster an immediate second squirt, I consider myself lucky if I don't loose consciousness. .
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Excellent, you can write Psychology Today and tell them the proof sited in their article is full of shit because you can't understand it.
I don't have to write anybody, the article definitively proving common sense, that it is indeed pee, has now been published and can be read by everyone, even the pseudoscience journalists at "Psychology Today".

This has a bit more academic merit than that tabloid:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25545022
 

Tiger

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2013
957
333
63
When I laugh really hard, sometimes I pee a little bit
Not surprising it can happen to women too during orgasm
Thanks for the link, Fuji
 

train

New member
Jul 29, 2002
6,992
0
0
Above 7
fuji posted a link from the internet it must right ! After all they tested an exhaustive sample of 7, you read correctly, 7 women. That should be your first clue as to scientific their methods were. Do a seach on the authors (none of them use Dr or MD) and see what you get. Put it down with the rest of the increasingly long list of things fuji is wrong on, although I can well imagine that he has never been with a women squirted.
 

Ms.FemmeFatale

Behind the camera
Jun 18, 2011
3,127
0
36
www.msfemmefatale.com
fuji posted a link from the internet it must right ! After all they tested an exhaustive sample of 7, you read correctly, 7 women. That should be your first clue as to scientific their methods were. Do a seach on the authors (none of them use Dr or MD) and see what you get. Put it down with the rest of the increasingly long list of things fuji is wrong on, although I can well imagine that he has never been with a women squirted.
This is why having Fuji on ignore is great. You should try it. Really... you should.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
fuji posted a link from the internet it must right ! After all they tested an exhaustive sample of 7, you read correctly, 7 women. That should be your first clue as to scientific their methods were. Do a seach on the authors (none of them use Dr or MD) and see what you get. Put it down with the rest of the increasingly long list of things fuji is wrong on, although I can well imagine that he has never been with a women squirted.
All sputter, no content. In fact every time you have tried to debate anything with me you have lost badly, which is why you now sit there hurling this kind of slur instead of attempting any actual debate.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
fuji posted a link from the internet it must right ! After all they tested an exhaustive sample of 7, you read correctly, 7 women. That should be your first clue as to scientific their methods were. Do a seach on the authors (none of them use Dr or MD) and see what you get. Put it down with the rest of the increasingly long list of things fuji is wrong on, although I can well imagine that he has never been with a women squirted.
Good points!
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
All sputter, no content. In fact every time you have tried to debate anything with me you have lost badly, which is why you now sit there hurling this kind of slur instead of attempting any actual debate.
In your mind you think he has lost.

The point about 7 women in a study not being representative for statistical purposes is a valid one (I will check that link myself now).
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
Wow. Can't believe that they (U.K.) are considering banning porn with squirting just because it might not be female ejaculate but pee. What fucking prudes.

The article does state that men may like it because it shows them that they've pleasured their lady.

I have an additional reason. If I'm with a beautiful and sexy lady, I will enjoy tasting it and even drinking it (fountain of youth for sure!).

(One Angel Monroe squirted into a cup while blowing me and playing with herself as she was on her knees. Then she took a sip of her own squirt and snowballed with me. Aweseome!)
 
Last edited:

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
In your mind you think he has lost.

The point about 7 women in a study not being representative for statistical purposes is a valid one (I will check that link myself now).
This is not an opinion poll. Human biology isn't that different one person to the next. In seven women who squirt the liquid was proved to be pee.

Which confirms common sense: no human gland can produce that volume of liquid that quickly, there is obviously a reservoir, and this study has confirmed what that reservoir is (pretty much the only thing it could ever have been).
 

kstanb

Well-known member
Apr 25, 2008
1,286
97
48
Wikipedia:

Female ejaculation vs. squirting or gushing

Some aspects of the research community distinguish between female ejaculation and what is colloquially known as squirting or gushing. These terms are used by the public interchangeably, which can lead to confusion. In these research publications, it is suggested that "real" female ejaculation is the release of a very scanty, thick, and whitish fluid from the female prostate, while the "squirting" or "gushing" (shown frequently in pornography) is a different phenomenon; the expulsion of clear and abundant fluid, which has been shown to be a diluted fluid from the urinary bladder. It is suggested that much of the obscurity and the uncertainties about female ejaculation are related to mixing up these two phenomena.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
This is not an opinion poll. Human biology isn't that different one person to the next. In seven women who squirt the liquid was proved to be pee.

Which confirms common sense: no human gland can produce that volume of liquid that quickly, there is obviously a reservoir, and this study has confirmed what that reservoir is (pretty much the only thing it could ever have been).
Statistics isn't just for opinion polls.

Science relies on statistics or statistical samples all of the time.

If it's pee, it sure doesn't taste like its coming from proficient squirters. (Wannabee squirters fluid tastes like pee). Yet, I wouldn't be surprised if it's very diluted urine from someone who is well-hydrated.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
12
38
So from now on the " I almost squirted myself" is right instead of "I almost peed myself"?

or a doctor can ask a squirt sample instead of urine sample? :)
Ha ha Iris.

BTW, here's a quote from an unnamed proficient squirter.

Two different colours of fluid let alone taste, consistency, and smell. As the number of orgasms increases the fluid will change further to have a more overt pheromone scent.
 
Toronto Escorts