Sports Betting Systems

Jan 22, 2008
268
0
16
Actually they do carry Woodbine now..........but they carry several easily accessible to view US tracks!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:

Hurricane Hank

Active member
May 21, 2008
5,176
0
36
lateforthegate said:
Actually they do carry Woodbine now..........but they carry several easily accessible to view US tracks!!!!!!!!

Ahhh...you edited this. They must have just started carrying Woodbine. lol
 

Hurricane Hank

Active member
May 21, 2008
5,176
0
36
bbking said:
There is no such thing as a sure fire sports betting system. In fact most of these telephone lines will give the favorite to 60% of the incoming calls and the remaining 40% they will recommend the dog. That way they got a client for the next week... a great scam.

Anyways sports betting is actually worse than slots in Vegas ... consider a very good baseball team wins less than 60% of the time ... less than your bet and the juice over the long haul. In football ... the line is generally made to make the game a 50/50 proposition moving up and down based on public perception.

bbk
So, you believe you have a better than a 50/50 chance at the slots? Good luck with that. I'll take my chances on football.
 
Last edited:

Hurricane Hank

Active member
May 21, 2008
5,176
0
36
Any one can twist the numbers. For example, if you only bet dogs on the money line, you can turn a profit while being correct less than 50% of the time.
As well, point spreads aren't always juiced the same way. Example:

Det -7 +115
Min +7 - 105

Bottom line is stick to what you have historically been good at. If thats football, great. If it's slots, good luck.
 

RemyMartin

Active member
Jan 16, 2004
1,094
1
38
bbking said:
Slots may have a high hold but the payout is much higher than sports betting ... you are falling for the head fake that sports betting actually is. Personally I wouldn't play the slots also ... if you like slots you should learn to play craps better odds.

Enjoy football but don't expect to get rich ... you have to be right 61% and above to make any money. The only play I make on football betting are teased parlay bets and even there I only bet small as it just enhances my viewing day.


bbk
there are sites that only charge 5 cents juice, so you only have to win 52% of the games to make money.
even if 10 cents juice, you start winning with 53%.
 

RemyMartin

Active member
Jan 16, 2004
1,094
1
38
bbking said:
5% juice means you have to win 56% of the time not 52


bbk
if bet 100 games.

win 52 games = +5200
lost 48 games = -5040 (48 x 1.05)
________
profit +160
 

RemyMartin

Active member
Jan 16, 2004
1,094
1
38
bbking said:
I stand corrected .... still don't like sports betting .... give me a deck a cards and I'll bust out most people


bbk
I don't think you should gamble at all.:D
 

buckwheat

New member
Jan 20, 2005
225
0
0
59
GTA
ontariolotteryplayersgroup.webs.com
Just an update, I purchased this system a couple weeks ago and so far I have been winning. He sent me in some stats of his pics this baseball season and I will share them with you all.
http://tinyurl.com/5zj9u9


Our current record for this year's MLB season would stand at 37-0.But, you know what? That's not the best part yet! The best part is....All 37 of those series would have been won oneither the [A] or level! That's right...by using the enhancedfilters you would never even have to make a single [C] wager thisyear! Here are the detailed results using the new filters: 418 Pittsburgh won [A]422 Seattle won [A]429 Boston won [A]502 Boston won [A]503 Kansas City won [A]509 New York Yankees won [A]513 Detroit won [A]524 Detroit won 527 Cincinnati won [A]528 Toronto won 530 Cincinnati won [A]530 Milwaukee won [A]531 Seattle won 607 Florida won 610 Houston won [A]610 LA Angels won 627 Chicago White Sox won [A]627 Cleveland won [A]627 NY Yankees won [A]628 Arizona won 628 Saint Louis won 630 Tampa Bay won [A]701 LA Dodgers won 707 LA Dodgers won [A]710 Florida won [A]721 Baltimore won [A]721 Detroit won [A]725 Chicago White Sox won [A]725 Arizona won [A]728 Pittsburgh won [A]728 Minnesota won [A]728 Kansas City won [A]801 Boston won [A]805 NY Mets won [A]805 Tampa Bay won 809 Detroit won 811 Minnesota won [A]

sorry its jumbled up, the # beside the team is the date and the letter after is when it won, A= 1st bet, B = second bet etc.

I look forward to many more wins..
 

Hurricane Hank

Active member
May 21, 2008
5,176
0
36
You just don't get it. I'm not saying it's the most original plan, but it is possible. And why should Buckwheat forward the picks to you ahead of time?
Did you help him pay for the system?
 

buckwheat

New member
Jan 20, 2005
225
0
0
59
GTA
ontariolotteryplayersgroup.webs.com
I was being nice and sharing his stats with you to show you it can work. I think it does work for me anyways, thats why I bought the system. All's I know is it has just about paid for itself and I am betting small amounts, trying not to be greedy and lose everything.
 

RemyMartin

Active member
Jan 16, 2004
1,094
1
38
bbking said:
...agreed ... anyone who says they can beat baseball is a lying @###. How do you win when most teams are under .500

I said it before these systems are scams. Basically they split their picks and get the winners to bet the next game and for more cash.


bbk
people can still win as long as you pick the winning teams more than losing teams. but I don't believe anybody can go 37-0.
 

RemyMartin

Active member
Jan 16, 2004
1,094
1
38
Hurricane Hank said:
You just don't get it. I'm not saying it's the most original plan, but it is possible. And why should Buckwheat forward the picks to you ahead of time?
Did you help him pay for the system?
winning of course possible, but going 37-0 is almost impossible. maybe Buckwheat just want to get commission if we buy the system, there is affiliate program on the site, he can get $100 commission everytime he sell one system.
Do you get it?
 

TheShadow

Knows
Aug 25, 2001
879
3
0
RemyMartin said:
winning of course possible, but going 37-0 is almost impossible.


I don't think he went 37-0 in games.
Any team that he won on a 'B' wager was the second time he bet that team,as he had lost with his 'A' bet.
He might have won 37 SERIES OVERALL,by increasing his 2nd $$ to cover the $$ losses on his 1st!
 

RayFinkel

Banned
Apr 5, 2004
6,446
0
0
UP IN YA
www.thebeerstore.ca
RemyMartin said:
if bet 100 games.

win 52 games = +5200
lost 48 games = -5040 (48 x 1.05)
________
profit +160
Those Numbers are totally wrong. If you bet 100 games and all games are (pick) then yes your numbers are correct.You never added the juice for all your bets

What if you pick +200 dogs.
you only need to win half the time or less
to make money.

What about round Robins? You only need to win 3 of 4 or 4 of 5. etc.

GAMBLING ON SPORTS IS NOT DECIDED ON WINNING OR LOSING.
IT'S SMART MONEY MANAGEMENT.

NEVER BET MORE THAN 10% OF YOUR BANKROLL


FIND A WINNING SYSTEM AND STICK WITH IT. (it takes days and hours of research to find a system. You will find one.)


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
 
Toronto Escorts