I am not.bbking said:Boy, I'm amazed at the level of hypocrasy from the GOP and several members of this board.
bbk
I am not.bbking said:Boy, I'm amazed at the level of hypocrasy from the GOP and several members of this board.
bbk
I'm also not surprised a bit by the GOP hypocrisy here.bbking said:...personally I would also like to see L. Craig step aside, and Senator Viter, who was also listed on a escort services phone logs should also do the same.
Boy, I'm amazed at the level of hypocrasy from the GOP and several members of this board.
bbk
I've come the the conclusion that you are not bright enough to have original thought...........I can't wait till the IRS starts looking at his expenses.WoodPeckr said:I'm also not surprised a bit by the GOP hypocrisy here.
Afterall the brain of a GOPer is wired differently, if at all, than a normal person's brain. The usual suspects here demonstrate this daily.....![]()
Look at how the mindnumbed among them still revere their dope addict El Rushbloe as their groovy OxyContin Guru! These sanctimonious hypocrites defend the likes of Larry Craig, Mark Foley, Sen. David Vitter , et al., yet claim to be so outraged by our hobbying Gov Spitzer on of all places an Escort Review Board.
bottie,onthebottom said:I've said both Craig and Spitzer were both wrong and stupid..... the hypocracy I've seen is from the likes of Pekkkkr who would celebrate this with a R but has nothing to say because it's a D.....
OTB
Priceless......papasmerf said:BTW smart guy you might want to run a speel checker.
What you write would rather be analogous to Governor Spitzer never having been Attorney General of New York, and as Governor he had denounced the scourge of prostitution as a blight on the landscape while patronizing the Emperors's Club.WoodPeckr said:It's really the same level of hypocrisy and maniacal moral fanaticism, as those GOPers who did the same when they ranted homophobic on one hand, while secretly boning Congressional pageboys and seeking homo trysts in airport washrooms.
Yes, and I think this is by far the most interesting aspect of this whole deal.Aardvark154 said:The New York Times has more this morning. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/nyregion/11inquire.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
The investigation began when banks noticed the frequent transfers from several accounts of several thousand dollars and filed suspicious activity reports with the Internal Revenue Service. The accounts were traced back to Spitzer, prompting public corruption investigators to open an inquiry. Their suspictions where heightened when the money ended up in bank accounts of what appeared to be shell companies, corporations that essentially had no real business. They intially suspected public corruption and called in the Public Corruption unit of the FBI.
They then discovered the Escort link and with the aid of a confidential informant where able to obtain court ordered wiretaps on the cellphones of those suspected of involvement in the escort service.
Possible charges against Spitzer could range from violation of the Mann Act, to banking law violations or even wire fraud.
Of course something that has been lost in all this is that those from the Emperor’s Club caught up in all this due to Spitzer's having drawn Police attention to them are still sitting in jail in New York.![]()
LOL!Aardvark154 said:I do believe that what he actually did rises to a higher level of hypocrisy.
Obviously you don't see a difference between having personally sent people to prison; and not voting to repeal existing laws (although that is almost entirely done on the State level) or making "hostile" public statements.WoodPeckr said:LOL!
....and I'm sure Craig, Foley and Vitter would agree with you!....
Already discussed this either on this thread or one of the others. Therefore in brief, what set off the alarm bells was the pattern of the transactions which were: A) deliberately designed to conceal where the money was coming from, and B) the amounts of which were all under the 10,000 limit but in the aggregate much greater (over a short period of time) than that amount [the banking crime Structuring]. C) the law(s) involved existed well before 2001 D) what the IRS intially suspected were extortion payments (by the Governor), bribes or kick-backs (recived by the Governor), or Income Tax evasion - if U.S. law were more or less like Canada regarding outcall that might well have been the end of it - perhaps with a Caution or Admonition Letter.chiller_boy said:Yes, and I think this is by far the most interesting aspect of this whole deal.
Apparently, as a result of the patriot act, banks are required to tell 'authorities' - not clear if this is homeland security or whoever - whenever transactions above $1000 seem 'suspicious'. Has Spitzer been outed because of a terrorist justiified investigation? If in fact he is using monies fraudulently that is one thing, but I am beginning to smell a rat here.
Yes it is, and your hypocrisy is howling about one but not the other.WoodPeckr said:It's really the same level of hypocrisy and maniacal moral fanaticism, as those GOPers who did the same when they ranted homophobic on one hand, while secretly boning Congressional pageboys and seeking homo trysts in airport washrooms.
Woody needs to blame Republicans.........it is an obsession with himonthebottom said:Yes it is, and your hypocrisy is howling about one but not the other.
OTB
Must say of the two, I at least can tell which one would take photographs at his sister's funeral (MD).katsrin said:Pictures, you know you wanna see ...
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0312084kristen1.html
Drudge has a bunch of related links up right now.
Here we see the softer side of Jim Cramer:
http://www.wjno.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=244038&article=3398347




