The good news is that you aren't in charge here. Fred runs the show.fuck, eh...? In my view, you are welcome to post whatever you'd like here. Sincerely, Jon .
The good news is that you aren't in charge here. Fred runs the show.fuck, eh...? In my view, you are welcome to post whatever you'd like here. Sincerely, Jon .
Yes... Your observation is correct, on this occasion. By the way, how many times have you been banned form this site, now....? Sincerely, Jon .The good news is that you aren't in charge here. Fred runs the show.
If you don't know you're not paying attention.Yes... Your observation is correct, on this occasion. By the way, how many times have you been banned form this site, now....? Sincerely, Jon .
What's wrong with that?Real classy how Smitherman draws the mental heath issues into his statement.
Maybe in subsequent comments I would find it less distasteful, but it just seems cold and more about deflecting criticism, using a an easy to blame cause (mental health issues) when there is always more to the story.What's wrong with that?
Maybe in subsequent comments I would find it less distasteful, but it just seems cold and more about deflecting criticism, using a an easy to blame cause (mental health issues) when there is always more to the story.What's wrong with that?
Maybe in subsequent comments I would find it less distasteful, but it just seems cold and more about deflecting criticism, using a an easy to blame cause (mental health issues) when there is always more to the story.
Do you know Lovehobby?Maybe in subsequent comments I would find it less distasteful, but it just seems cold and more about deflecting criticism, using a an easy to blame cause (mental health issues) when there is always more to the story.
Yes... I agree. Sincerely, Jon .'.....but it just seems cold and more about deflecting criticism, using a an easy to blame cause (mental health issues) when there is always more to the story'.
Or it could be just a way of shedding light on an unfortunately very common problem, but a very private suffering condition of our modern society, saying anyone can be a victim.Maybe in subsequent comments I would find it less distasteful, but it just seems cold and more about deflecting criticism, using a an easy to blame cause (mental health issues) when there is always more to the story.
I am sad for Mr. Peloso's children- that he had with his female wife- before he decided to swoosh off and play hide the sausage with another man. One mght wonder what Mr. Pelosos's original wife will tell her children about their father and how he came to his end..... Very sad, indeed. Sincerely, Jon .I suspect his wife George, was fairly hard on him, no doubt very much a bully....and this would have led to Pelosos state.
i feel bad for the deceased persons wife. So sad!
Dumb does not describe him. He is a moronic, ignorant, uncivilized prejudist.Dumb fuck you are.
I agree that Mr. Peloso was a confused individual. In my view, anger and hostility resonates at the very heart of Homosexual behaviour and the Homosexual lifestyle. Sincerely, Jon .Mr Pelosos, certainly was confused....but also selfish to end like this.
No doubt, guilt for leaving his first wife, to take a second, angrier, uglier wife in George.
And perhaps regret, as his first wife was no doubt more pleasant, prettier, and less angry than his second wife.
Just so sad!
If your SO was missing for a day and a half wouldn't you be worried? I hope so .He's only been missing for a day and a half though.