Dream Spa
Toronto Escorts

Six dead after bus crashes with Via train at marked crossing in Ottawa.

KBear

Supporting Member
Aug 17, 2001
4,169
1
38
west end
www.gtagirls.com
People get distracted or their mind wanders and they rear end cars and trucks all the time. People make mistakes all the time while driving, just hope when mistakes are made there is not a train involved. Think the guy’s mind wandered and he hit the train.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,087
1
0
It depends on what happens after you stop taking diabetes medication. People not taking meds because they "feel fine" is not unusual to me since that's a common excuse. Even though i had a lot to drink, I feel fine and choose to drive. If I have a minor head injury "I'm okay" only to discover later that it was a critical or even lethal.
Yes, there are those who stop taking antibiotics because they feel better, but I don't put them in the same boat as diabetics, sorry. The end result of not taking your diabetic meds can be shock, coma, even death, not the best end result for forgetting you meds. That tends to motivate a diabetic. You've gone off on this idiot tangent based on a theoretical situation of this terrible event, quietly casting dispersion on the driver. Hell, l why not say he say a vision of the virgin Mary on the horizon and wasn't watching the road. It makes as much sense. For crying out loud, people are even supposing he and his wife possibly celebrated too much the night before and therefore he was in no condition to work. Total speculation and with no basis as is your line of thinking.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,170
1,337
113
Yes, there are those who stop taking antibiotics because they feel better, but I don't put them in the same boat as diabetics, sorry. The end result of not taking your diabetic meds can be shock, coma, even death, not the best end result for forgetting you meds. That tends to motivate a diabetic. You've gone off on this idiot tangent based on a theoretical situation of this terrible event, quietly casting dispersion on the driver. Hell, l why not say he say a vision of the virgin Mary on the horizon and wasn't watching the road. It makes as much sense. For crying out loud, people are even supposing he and his wife possibly celebrated too much the night before and therefore he was in no condition to work. Total speculation and with no basis as is your line of thinking.
What's with the attitude?! So sorry to offend the mighty Blackrock, the official moderator and expert to everything in the world. Maybe you need to be on some meds and calm down!?

I ask these questions because I want to understand what the hell happened and not cast dispersion on the driver or insult your almighty wisdom. So sorry that my questions are stupid in your world, but asking them is not an offence to you or humanity. Asking gets us closer to understanding what happens.

No shit I'm speculating Sherlock! Every contribution so far is a speculation because we were not there and not remotely experts. Not even you, the eternally wise, all-powerful and knowing Blackrock, can claim even the slightest insight into this accident no matter what details you can grab from the news.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,087
1
0
What's with the attitude?! So sorry to offend the mighty Blackrock, the official moderator and expert to everything in the world. Maybe you need to be on some meds and calm down!?

I ask these questions because I want to understand what the hell happened and not cast dispersion on the driver or insult your almighty wisdom. So sorry that my questions are stupid in your world, but asking them is not an offence to you or humanity. Asking gets us closer to understanding what happens.

No shit I'm speculating Sherlock! Every contribution so far is a speculation because we were not there and not remotely experts. Not even you, the eternally wise, all-powerful and knowing Blackrock, can claim even the slightest insight into this accident no matter what details you can grab from the news.
Neither attitude, almighty, eternally wise, or expert on everything on earth, simply factual. Yes, you are casting dispersion as nothing that has come to light has said or even hinted he missed his meds, his doing so could be spun into showing a lack of judgement, responsibility or commitment that might be put on him at the accident. No, every contribution is not speculation as some are passing on what is being offered up by TSB, other investigators, and reporters on site.
 

rafterman

A sadder and a wiser man
Feb 15, 2004
3,483
79
48
Sorry to have to be the spelling police but it's ASPERSIONS not dispersions. Otherwise please continue with your diatribes.
 

nobodyhome

New member
Feb 21, 2004
30
0
0
Anyone find it odd that the train was unable to sound its horn between 8pm and noon?
Regardless of any municipal bylaw the engineer is always allowed to sound the train's whistle in order to prevent a collision. If the whistle wasn't sounded then maybe the crew didn't realize the collision was imminent until the last moment. It would appear from the photographs that the bus struck the train immediately beneath the door on the left side of the locomotive's cab.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,170
1,337
113
Neither attitude, almighty, eternally wise, or expert on everything on earth, simply factual. Yes, you are casting dispersion as nothing that has come to light has said or even hinted he missed his meds, his doing so could be spun into showing a lack of judgement, responsibility or commitment that might be put on him at the accident. No, every contribution is not speculation as some are passing on what is being offered up by TSB, other investigators, and reporters on site.
So sorry to be casting dispersion on the driver then. Ten thousand pardons for ever asking the "stupid" question or for insulting your intelligence! You can put away your axe now.

It is a fact that the driver is ultimately responsible for safely operating operating his vehicle safely despite any personal problems, health conditions or mechanical problem with the vehicle.

One problem with arguing over facts like you seem to love doing is that there is always room for interpretation and we (including the TSB investigators, or reporters on site) will never truly know what happened. We'll only have a best guest to what happened. We can change procedures, mechanical systems, training, etc. to prevent this from happening, but there is always a chance it will. Maybe what we change in processes will cause other unexpected consequences or failures. One other thing you haven't thought about is that we have bits and pieces of facts and will never have an complete picture of what happened. Accidents happen because of a series of failures and events, not just a single trigger point.

Tragedies like this are not new and will always happen so long as there is a human at the controls.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,628
2,515
113
Anyone find it odd that the train was unable to sound its horn between 8pm and noon?
Cant help but think if perhaps the train simply used a horn it would have gotten the drivers attention.
Can you say NIMBY?

Train was going 47 mph at time of impact, faster than I thought, and gates and lights were down for around 25 seconds before impact. Guy must have fell asleep or did it on purpose. Even a texter looks up frequently, and he would have heard the passengers yelling.
I'd be surprised if he fell asleep on the short straight after making the sweeping left hand turn.

This is why I think he must have done something dumb like put his foot on the accelerator by mistake when he mean to brake and then by the time he corrected it was too late.
That will be easy to determine. My guess is he didn't simply step on the wrong pedal.

The survivors are now saying that....yes there was screaming to stop...however the driver was also frantically pumping on the brakes..as if they were not working.

OC Transpo drivers in the Union argued against this bus when it cAme on line. The city brought I believe 10 on line and drivers argued it was too heavy, too unsafe, and many refused to sign up as drivers for them, feeling as well it was difficult to maneuver.
It's one thing if the bus had a mechanical failure, it's another if the bus is truly unsafe. However, complete brake failure is highly unlikely as others have stated.

http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/ottawa-bus-crash-driver-had-diabetes-common-for-transit-job

Driver had diabetes and had not taken his prescribed medication because he felt fine.
Might be on to something there.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,360
11
38
That horse has left the barn, don't you think?
Yes of course but explorerzip was asking a hypothetical question.

I would say that the driver would be negligent if he didn't take his meds but maybe his employer would be responsible to a degree too as they are vicariously liable.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,360
11
38
It depends on what happens after you stop taking diabetes medication. People not taking meds because they "feel fine" is not unusual to me since that's a common excuse. Even though i had a lot to drink, I feel fine and choose to drive. If I have a minor head injury "I'm okay" only to discover later that it was a critical or even lethal.
If you are clinically diagnosed as a diabetic and prescribed medication as a result, you MUST take your daily meds no matter how 'fine' you feel. Only with regular blood tests (& perhaps healthy weight loss) can one determine that they might not need medication.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,087
1
0
Yes of course but explorerzip was asking a hypothetical question.

I would say that the driver would be negligent if he didn't take his meds but maybe his employer would be responsible to a degree too as they are vicariously liable.
Fair enough, but nothing like blaming the dead guy. As for the company, i'll let the real lawyers comment on that , but tough hard to prove that you knew that an employee didn't take his meds.
 
Toronto Escorts