Singles wake up Stop voting for supporting families
- Thread starter happ
- Start date
If we are catering to trending social norms, let's give tax breaks to Sugar Daddies. The allowance should be tax deductible.
I agree that single people are overlooked, but it's the party of FAMILY VALUES that makes things catered towards that living arrangement more than any other group.
And people shouldn't have to pay for other people's abortins either. We pay for you to get sex education. They teach you how to put a condom on a dildo in grade 6. Are you so stupid that you still manage to forget to use a condom ?
Of course the solution is to go back to Government created money. This is what we did from 1935-1974. When Canada had no debt, 1,800 tons of Gold ( not including platinum, nickel, and copper ), a Dollar on par or higher than the US Dollar, and virtually no inflation. But I guess that's a bit of a pipe dream for people that can't figure out where babies come from.
Of course the solution is to go back to Government created money. This is what we did from 1935-1974. When Canada had no debt, 1,800 tons of Gold ( not including platinum, nickel, and copper ), a Dollar on par or higher than the US Dollar, and virtually no inflation. But I guess that's a bit of a pipe dream for people that can't figure out where babies come from.
Its a lot cheaper to pay for an abortion then social services for single parents.
cheaper u mean than refugees ahh
frank raises another point how liberals devalue children to obtain more of the pizza.
funding single parents probably no more than country shopping refugees n criminals and we know what we're gettin
We live in a society that can only accomplish some things efficiently (or perhaps at all) through the collective action of government. Having said that, none of us could ever receive every type of benefit distributed by government, or be able to take advantage of every public work paid for out of the public purse. The question every tax payer has to ask themselves is whether our tax money is well spent on initiatives that improve/sustain our society. Even if you don't ever use the roads, the the goods and services you need are shipped over them. Even if you have no children in school, your business (or your employer's business) benefits from the availability of an educated work force, and that makes your employment/business more secure. Everything we use government to do for us has to be viewed through this lens. It isn't possible to evaluate the "fairness" of tax policy in a vacuum without considering what the money is spent on.
I would acknowledge that it is possible that some individuals, nevertheless, may be getting less return from society than they contribute, at least at a particular point in their life. However, these "injustices" are what elections and democracy are for. Having said that, there seems to be overwhelming democratic support for tax policy and education policy that supports and encourages Canadians to have children and to have those children receive a minimum education before entering the job market. Must be because that's good for almost everyone.
I would acknowledge that it is possible that some individuals, nevertheless, may be getting less return from society than they contribute, at least at a particular point in their life. However, these "injustices" are what elections and democracy are for. Having said that, there seems to be overwhelming democratic support for tax policy and education policy that supports and encourages Canadians to have children and to have those children receive a minimum education before entering the job market. Must be because that's good for almost everyone.
