Welll lets see, you'd probably have 200 innocent bystanders dead from errand bulletssizematters said:Imagine a different scene yesterday if 57 bystanders returned fire!
Welll lets see, you'd probably have 200 innocent bystanders dead from errand bulletssizematters said:Imagine a different scene yesterday if 57 bystanders returned fire!
pepsiman said:AT one time skeet shooting was a school activity. People took their shot gun to school on the bus and put them in their lockers . shells and all . when it was time to shoot said people took these guns out of their locker and walked though the school to the shooting place . Gun in one hand and shells in the other . This was ten years ago .
JUST immagine a guy standing at the road waiting for the bus today with a shotgun . Nobody got shot back then :: it is the people that are all screwwy
my thoughts exactly.Esco! said:Welll lets see, you'd probably have 200 innocent bystanders dead from errand bullets
Actually I was just thinking there has always been violence and there always will be violence. Guns just enable a more detached and executable type of violence.Glowing Member said:People
The guns have always been here. What we should be asking is what has changed to make people use them against other people! Has our social safety net begun to show holes? Do people see no other way other than violence??
Think about it
Glow
Huh? Is it "pride" and self-centered to want to protect myself? Or is it just logical?pool said:Actually I was just thinking there has always been violence and there always will be violence. Guns just enable a more detached and executable type of violence.
As a society we are too caught up in pride and self.
I think both are part of the answer, no ?wop said:...banning guns is not the answer, empowering our children to resolve conflicts and teaching them to believe in themselves and their futures is.
ISOMSOG said:I honestly don't have the answers either and something has to be done i agree but banning hand guns isn't going to make this go away, sorry...
OH NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!ronzodd said:They don't get back out on the street to do it again!
ronzodd said:Sounds to me like "We'll punish lawabiding, taxpayers totally unrelated to your criminal act if you keep killing people!!"
I gotta agree, that is leaning toward part of the answer, even if it may tread on civil liberties, but to what extent would have to be determined by what we as a whole would consider reasonable intrusions. It needs to be addressed at a community level as well though if the cycle is ever to be minimized.ronzodd said:NO THE ANSWER IS more extreme police powers...declare a state of emergency and use some of the war measures act powers to stop and searcha gang members and hoodlums on the street BEFORE THEY KILL SOMEONE!!
Probably No, pooliepool said:Again, we are too caught up in self and immediate goals. A more unified anti gun mindset along with addressing poverty, parenting, family structure etc etc if effectively implemented, long term should and I think would reduce the tendency toward criminal activity.
no ?