Shamefull PEEPEE votes AGAINST Scrap the Tax

[squeezer]

Shameful actions were taken by PeePee and the Conservatives, who were voting against a temporary tax break. This is what you call a hypocritical stream of piss.

Poilievre says Conservatives will vote against proposed Liberal GST holiday

https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6577373

 

[DesRicardo]

 

[squeezer]

An estimated $116 in savings in 2 months, not bad yet PEE PEE along with the Bloc wants to deny Canadians these $$$$$$.

 

[shack]

An estimated $116 in savings in 2 months, not bad yet PEE PEE along with the Bloc wants to deny Canadians these $$$$$$.

To butcher a saying:

They are cutting off the noses of Canadians to spite Trudeau's face.

It's better to fuck citizens over than to let Trudeau have a small moment in the sun. He's going to lose anyways, so this makes them look very small. They'd vote against him if he wanted to raise the tax as well.

 

[squeezer]

To butcher a saying:

They are cutting off the noses of Canadians to spite Trudeau's face.

It's better to fuck citizens over than to let Trudeau have a small moment in the sun. He's going to lose anyways, so this makes them look very small. They'd vote against him if he wanted to raise the tax as well.

Yup, it's the Trump affect happening here. Pee Pee can do no wrong even though he acts like a complaining, whiny little biatch!

 

[Frankfooter]

The libs can now campaign with PeePee having voted against GST tax cuts and all housing initiatives.

 

[DesRicardo]

An estimated $116 in savings in 2 months, not bad yet PEE PEE along with the Bloc wants to deny Canadians these $$$$$$.

$116 in two months is peanuts today and also runs the risk of driving inflation up. This is just a ploy to keep Christmas shopping from floundering.

The bigger issue is how is Trudeau going to cover the deficit after? Will he hit his $40 billion target?

 

[Frankfooter]

$116 in two months is peanuts today and also runs the risk of driving inflation up. This is just a ploy to keep Christmas shopping from floundering.

The bigger issue is how is Trudeau going to cover the deficit after? Will he hit his $40 billion target?

Yet PeePee just voted against a tax cut.

 

[squeezer]

$116 in two months is peanuts today and also runs the risk of driving inflation up. This is just a ploy to keep Christmas shopping from floundering.

The bigger issue is how is Trudeau going to cover the deficit after? Will he hit his $40 billion target?

Ah I see, but AX THE TAX carbon tax is not??? Doug giving everyone a $200 is not??? Hmmmm, please explain why it is ok for some to give tax cuts but not for Justin??

 

[DesRicardo]

Ah I see, but AX THE TAX carbon tax is not??? Doug giving everyone a $200 is not??? Hmmmm, please explain why it is ok for some to give tax cuts but not for Justin??

You're not making any sense.

Carbon tax is not a federal revenue stream, it's meant to "put more money in your pocket".
Ford's rebate is based on future financial positioning. They had a $3 billion decrease in deficit so they decided to give it back to tax payers.

So the reason why it's ok to give tax cuts is the budget has to warrant it. Trudeau will most likely exceed the promised $40 billion deficit this budget. He needs the money. We need the money.

 

[squeezer]

You're not making any sense.

Let's test your theory and see who isn't making any sense

Carbon tax is not a federal revenue stream, it's meant to "put more money in your pocket".

Ah, so you are say Pee Pee is going to AX A TAX that actually puts money into the pockets of Canadian???? Interesting, thank you for the clarification.

Ford's rebate is based on future financial positioning. They had a $3 billion decrease in deficit so they decided to give it back to tax payers.

Yet they are in a deficit, please read and absorb what the conservative-biased Fraser Institute has to say about Ford's deficit then try and make sense of your points because you sir are not making any sense so far

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/ontario-government-chooses-deficits-and-debt-again#:~:text=The%20Ford%20government%20last%20week,opportunity%20to%20balance%20the%20books

.

So the reason why it's ok to give tax cuts is the budget has to warrant it. Trudeau will most likely exceed the promised $40 billion deficit this budget. He needs the money. We need the money.

Ford needs the money too based on the Fraser Institute yet you smugly and ignorantly criticize Justin only. Hmmmmmm

 

[DesRicardo]

Let's test your theory and see who isn't making any sense



Ah, so you are say Pee Pee is going to AX A TAX that actually puts money into the pockets of Canadian???? Interesting, thank you for the clarification.



Yet they are in a deficit, please read and absorb what the conservative-biased Fraser Institute has to say about Ford's deficit then try and make sense of your points because you sir are not making any sense so far

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/ontario-government-chooses-deficits-and-debt-again#:~:text=The%20Ford%20government%20last%20week,opportunity%20to%20balance%20the%20books

.




Ford needs the money too based on the Fraser Institute yet you smugly and ignorantly criticize Justin only. Hmmmmmm

Jesus Christ.

"put more money in your pocket" is in quotes because It doesn't actually put money back in your pocket, it pushes up the sales price.

The Fraser article only highlights what I'm telling you. His budgets are on track and managed. As I've said before, many of you here are illiterate. Ford is not over spending, he's on budget.

Trudeau is over budget. Why has he delayed his Budget update to mid December?

 

[The Oracle]

 

[Frankfooter]

Ford is not over spending, he's on budget.

You should never believe DoFo.
The 2024 budget projects a whopping $9.8-billion deficit this year, despite the government promising it would post a surplus of $200 million in its last budget, released just a year ago.

 

[squeezer]

Jesus Christ.

"put more money in your pocket" is in quotes because It doesn't actually put money back in your pocket, it pushes up the sales price.

The Fraser article only highlights what I'm telling you. His budgets are on track and managed. As I've said before, many of you here are illiterate. Ford is not over spending, he's on budget.

Trudeau is over budget. Why has he delayed his Budget update to mid December?

I really hope you manage your personal finances better than what you show here because the street is a cold one this time a year and a cardboard box just doesn't cute it.

 

[speakercontrols]

you people think free $ is free...morons.

 

[squeezer]

you people think free $ is free...morons.

Yeah, fucking Doug Ford for giving everyone and I mean EVERYONE a $200 cheque and FUCK PEE PEE for his AX THE TAX slogan. Imagine giving people free $$$$$, morons!

 

[speakercontrols]

Yeah, fucking Doug Ford for giving everyone and I mean EVERYONE a $200 cheque and FUCK PEE PEE for his AX THE TAX slogan. Imagine giving people free $$$$$, morons!

Both are a waste of time doing this free $ shit.

People better start reading what happened to Greece when they couldn't pay their bondholders...

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Cant stand Chrystia Freeland.
Fucking cunt. lol
Whether or not it passes it is useless anyway.

 

[DesRicardo]

I really hope you manage your personal finances better than what you show here because the street is a cold one this time a year and a cardboard box just doesn't cute it.

Personal finances are nothing like public budgets.

If Ford budgets a $8 billion deficit and he ends up with an $8 billion deficit, What's the change is financial position?
If Trudeau budgets a $40 billion deficit and he ends up with an over $50 billion deficit, What's the change is financial position?

This is why they are not comparable. One is on budget, the other is not.