The fact that gays can have children and are permitted to adopt does not make it optimal and does not mean Canadian society should support this activity or give it preferential treatment. Laws which give preferential treatment to certain defined classes should do so on the basis that what they are contributing to Canadian society is "optimal" from the point of view the interests of Canadians in general.woolf said:Gays can, and do have children ... their own and adopted.
See above. As to your "sticking your nose in other peoples business" comment, you simply aren't making any sense. It's everyone's business in a democracy whether certain relationships will be recognized by the state, particularly when legal rights (not to mention social consequences) will flow from that recognition. Your comment is patronizing (ie. "misfounded"), presumptuous (ie. "no other reason..."), illogical, and undemocratic (ie. "other people's private business").woolf said:The reason it is "very difficult to say that gay relationships serve the same purpose" is not because they can't actually server the same purpose, but because people like you just don't want to give them a legal right to serve the same purpose because of some kind of misfounded belief that you have a right to stick your nose in other peoples private business for no other reason than you find it against your own personal tastes.
It is obvious from my earlier comment that I do not think that it optimal for gay partners to raise children, most of whom will be straight and would benefit from the influence of both a man and women as parents. There are more than enough heterosexual couples having children for governments to worry about finding ways to encourage gay couples to contribute to society in this way.woolf said:This is a "chicken /egg" argument that doesn't stand up outside of it's own internal logic ... gays can't contribute to society because we make it illegal for them to do so, and we make it illegal so they can't contribute ... stop making it illegal and then your concern about them not contributing disappears.
All of these legal movements are about gays wanting to feel more comfortable about themselves. Nothing more nor less.