I dio not agree but in any event that affects the veracity of the contents how?
Who paid for it is separate from the source.
And according to the authors it's the FSB. They are even claiming FSB operatives have been killed over it.
So again I ask Why, if Russia is the disseminater of fake information, we should believe a case officer in the FSB didn't take advantage of Steele to disseminate false information with a few truthful parts to lend it an air of credibility.
It's essentially what they do right?
How is this one time they are telling the truth?
And Fusion is a mercenary group. They will work for anyone for whatever purpose. Not exactly a credible source at this point with the numerous obstructions and taking of the Fifth they engaged in.
Face it. Even the press won't, despite its leak, report on dossier specifics because they can't verify any if it.
And don't think that every damn news organisation as well as independent journalist with an interest didn't try.
For over a year now.
So yes I will question it's veracity.