fuji said:
It's treated like regular income before or after 65. The only thing that happens at 65 is they start forcing you to withdraw it.
I don't really believe there are better stock pickers out there so if someone is charging you a 3% fee on a fund the difference between that and a cheap index fund is the 3% fee you're paying.
Umm..no...First,the age that they force you to start withdrawing is 71.
Second, how can you make that comment about stock picking when the best stock picker of all time, Warren Buffet (sorry Peter Lynch), is still around. If you buy BRK, you get an instant actively managed portfolio and he charges you $0 for his work. Average return for brk is over 25%/year. A $10,000 investment into Berkshire Hathaway when Buffett took control in 1965 would be worth over $60 million today. By comparison, $10,000 in the S&P 500 would have grown to only $500,000. If you can't afford the $132,000/share for brk.a, he has a brk.b for just $4,400.
Also, I personally don't mind paying a higher management fee if the returns are there year after year. I have some investments that average 17%/year (after fees) over the last 10-15 years. I have even payed as high as 7% in management fees. Do I care? No, I got over 80% gain that year. If the performance is there, don't be so cheap.
Finally, there is a risk in being too cautious. The risk is outliving your money. There is a time to take controlled risks, especially if you are young. Even the CFA avocates that in some situations, 100% equity portfolio is ideal.
Having said all of that, I do follow the Treynor-Black Model, with the majority of my portfolio is market index, and has served me well over the years.