Review question

[Spartan7]

So do you all prefer a new thread being made for each SP review or experience, or to have it added on as a post to another topic about said SP?

I see lots of both and I'm wondering if there's some sort of etiquette to it here.

Thanks!

 

[bcd]

There was another thread on this topic, I believe started by an SP who suggested rather than start a new thread each time, just add to an existing review so people don't have to search through various threads or reviews for their info. Personally I don't mind either way.

 

[Mr Bret]

I think all reviews about any given SP should be in one thread..
Makes searching for info much easier.

Also allows readers to read back a few posts (or as many as they want) to see if the SP gets consistent reviews over time.

 

[yomero5]

I think all reviews about any given SP should be in one thread..
Makes searching for info much easier.

Also allows readers to read back a few posts (or as many as they want) to see if the SP gets consistent reviews over time.

That's a great idea! Moderators, please make this happen.

 

[Frankfooter]

This is a great idea, think I'll start a new thread about this.

 

[IRIS]

If it's a new girl and you want help her, then post a new review. Personally as a longtime member with countless review, I don't care if you write new or add an other for my existing review. If you post a new review ,much more member read it as they read the added reviews because they don't know the new review there. Trust me, many people are lazy to roll down the thread to check there is a new review or just a comment from an other member or from the reviewed girl. Half of the guys don't start to read again a thread what they read already. I believe new threads are more helpful for new girls. Just for my two cents!

 

[applebaum]

I much prefer that people add to an existing review. It is much easier to see more info. on the SP.

 

[SirWanker]

I think all reviews about any given SP should be in one thread..
Makes searching for info much easier.
Also allows readers to read back a few posts (or as many as they want) to see if the SP gets consistent reviews over time.

I much prefer that people add to an existing review. It is much easier to see more info. on the SP.

That is what the Search function is there for combined with multiple browser sessions/tabs for each review.
Obviously I prefer a new thread per review.

 

[justfor]

Definitely don't start a new review thread when one already exists.

 

[sempel]

Thanks for asking the question - I say that because I've stated on numerous occasions that the better approach is to add to an existing thread versus creating new threads each and every time. Of course when I make the suggestion a bunch of nutballs come out and say "Who the hell am I to suggest this", say I'm impinging on people's freedom to choose how to post and when to create new threads, etc. Some seriously demented people that take things way too seriously and prefer disorganization.

The SP Iris has posted on here so I'll just use her for an example. If you search for Iris you will get many pages of answers. Some will be review threads, some will be recommendations for X and Iris fits the bill so she'll be named, and the rest are threads where either the name Iris appeared in a different context or Iris herself perhaps wrote something. Could take you anywhere from 2 min to maybe 10 min to filter through everything to get the info. OTOH, if people simply added reviews to an existing thread, that would result in less searching for multiple review threads, you can see the trend/dates to know when people saw her, people could maintain certain info like stats and not repeat them, etc. It's definitely the better way to go.

 

[The "Bone" Ranger]

I cannot understand why somebody would knowingly start a new thread on an SP.

 

[sempel]

I cannot understand why somebody would knowingly start a new thread on an SP.

Fair question yet it continually occurs over and over again. Laziness? Arrogance? I think I've created approx. 5 new review threads and that's because 4/5 nothing existed and 1/5 needed a specific title.