Reasons why the Toronto Maple Leafs will never win the Stanley Cup in the modern era

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Maybe you need a second team in YYZ (a Mets equivalent) to give the Leafs management something to worry about. Of course that would only work if the NHL was actually playing hockey.

OTB
 
Y

yychobbyist

gladheateher said:
1969 - Ernie Moser (9th overall) - could have had Ivan Boldirev (11th overall).

1973 - Bob Neely (10th overall) - could have had Rick Middleton (14th overall).

1974 - Jack Valiquette (13th overall) - could have had Dave Maloney (14th overall).

1977 - Trevor Johansen (12th overall) - could have had Mike Bossy (15th overall).

1981 - Jim Benning (6th overall) - could have had Grant Fuhr (8th overall).

1982 - Gary Nylund (3rd overall) - could have had Scott Stevens (5th overall).

1987 - Luke Richardson (7th overall) - could have had Joe Sakic (15th overall).

1988 - Scott Pearson (6th overall) - could have had Jeremy Roenick (8th overall), Rod Brind’Amour or Teemu Salanne.

1989 - Scott Thornton (3rd overall) - could have had Bill Guerin (5th overall), Stu Barnes, Bobby Holik or Olaf Kolzig

1989 - Steve Bancroft (21st overall) - could have had Adam Foote (22nd overall).

1990 - Drake Berehowsky (10th overall) - could have had Keith Tkachuk (19th overall), Martin Brodeur or Bryan Smolinski

1992 - Brandon Convery (8th overall) - could have had Sergei Gonchar (14th overall) or Grant Marshall

1993 - Landon Wilson (19th overall) - could have had Saku Koivu (21st overall).

1994 - Eric Fichaud (16th overall) - could have had Dan Cloutier (26th overall).

1995 - Jeff Ware (15th overall) - could have had Petr Sykora (18th overall) or Martin Biron

1996 – Marek Posmyk (36th overall) - could have had Zdeno Chara (56th overall)

1998 - Nikolai Antropov (10th overall) - could have had Alex Tanguay (12th overall).

1999 - Luca Cereda (24th overall) - could have had Martin Havlat (26th overall).

The problem with this coulda-shoulda-woulda analysis is that you can do it for any NHL team and come up with alternative draft choices. What makes the Leafs record so bad in comparison with many other teams though is that they really don't even have one out and out success in the first round (or any other round for that matter).

I think one problem the Leafs have had is that problem which seems to affect storied franchises in big markets- they've been pretty full of themselves. They hire poorly, they draft poorly, they almost expect everyone to stand aside and let them succeed and even small doses of success go to their heads.
 

Esco!

Banned
Nov 10, 2004
12,606
1
0
Toront Ho
Kathleen said:
N_V - It's certainly not nice when you get blasted, and others don't.

I'm one of 'those' leaf fan, I might as well be honest.
Yes, I've never been big on Pat Quinn, or a GM since Cliff Fletcher. I'd like to see compitent scouts draft someone like a Rob Blake or Peter Forsberg. I don't feel free agents always the answer.
I would like to see a single owner as is the case with Ottawa, and not a board.
Yes, Toronto has not won a cup since 1967. But it's no easy task no matter how good you draft.
Has Toronto of today been that bad to fans? I don't think so. I started watching Toronto after Harold Ballard passed. Now fine, through those times, Toronto was said to be sad. None the less, fans did have the chance to see some amazing players.

Since I started watching Toronto in 1993, I've seen a solid winning record. For the most, nothing to be ashamed of. Through the Potvin, Fuhr, Cujo and Belfour days, some serious runs at the cup.
From '93 I have seen Alex Mogilney fly, Sundin's amazing backhand goals, Dougie's amazing OT goal on St Louis, many sweet fights from Wendel and countless highlights.
Nights when Potvin or Cujo stood on their heads. I remember seeing Mike Gartner flying down the wing and one timming so many goals. The good memories far out weigh the bad to me.

Toronto's past is better then their present cup wise, but it's their past that attracts players and fans. Allowing them to be part of 13 Stanley cups, or 64 playoff appearances. They had a bad spell in the 80s, but that was bad ownership.

The leafs before that, and the Leafs of today are something to be proud about. It's the closest NHL city to me, so I consider them home town favorites.. and I love them.

Kathleen
You make an excellent point Kath but I'm gonna tell you why I think you're wrong.

Leaf owner is very smart so what he does is he makes it look like he's building a winner when really what he's doing is forming an almost-team of good players but not great players. A teaser if you will.
Fans think they are oh-so close to winning it every year and keep coming back in droves. It's brilliant when you think about it.

Meanwhile the owner is laughing all the way to the bank.
:eek:
 

hummingbird

Member
Jan 27, 2003
54
0
6
I'm counting 8 years from the list above when nobody was drafted - this is potentially much worse, when you make the mid-season trade to get a burnt-out 33 year old for future considerations. The Leafs seem to specialize in this - getting phase 2 of Wendel Clark or someone else just as useless.
 
Y

yychobbyist

Escohort said:
You make an excellent point Kath but I'm gonna tell you why I think you're wrong.

Leaf owner is very smart so what he does is he makes it look like he's building a winner when really what he's doing is forming an almost-team of good players but not great players. A teaser if you will.
Fans think they are oh-so close to winning it every year and keep coming back in droves. It's brilliant when you think about it.

Meanwhile the owner is laughing all the way to the bank.
:eek:

This is actually a very interesting argument and it's one that's been made in relation to the Boston Red Sox as well. Some in baseball are arguing that the worst thing in the world that could have happened to the Sox is winning the world series because there's nowhere to go but down. Now all of a sudden the expectation is to win another and another and these days that's next to impossible. So the fans feel screwed by the players, management and owners and they abandon the team and 5 years from now they' end up playing in half empty stadiums and the owners find themselves in financial trouble.

I find it an interesting argument and I think the same may be true of the Leafs.
 

Esco!

Banned
Nov 10, 2004
12,606
1
0
Toront Ho
hummingbird said:
I'm counting 8 years from the list above when nobody was drafted - this is potentially much worse, when you make the mid-season trade to get a burnt-out 33 year old for future considerations. The Leafs seem to specialize in this - getting phase 2 of Wendel Clark or someone else just as useless.
Exactly my point!!
They always seem to be getting players that are nearly over the hill or ARE over the hill. This is not how you build a winner.
The last few years they had a good chance to sign some superstars but they didnt.
I dont remember their names but I think it was Blake and a few others.
They used the excuse that there was no money which is true because the owner has probably siphoned it all away.
 

Galahad

Discombobulated Member
Dec 28, 2003
2,346
0
36
Sarras
One of the Leafs' problem is development of drafted players. When Ballard took over, he decimated the Leafs by selling their farm teams for a quick profit. The Leafs have never recover from it.

With the Leafs' record of developing their drafted players, even if they had drafted Bossy, Stevens, Sakic, Roenick, or Guerin, these players would probably spent their career in the minors and never amount to much.
 

hornyharry

New member
Sep 30, 2003
389
0
0
3rd rock from the 3rd rock
I have been a loyal supporter of the Leafs for as long as I can remember. Do I agree with some of the decisions made over the years...NO...but...at the time of drafting/trading for players who here knew that these guys would or would not be stars??? Hindsight is worth a million dollars right??
 

scubadoo

Exile on Main Street
Sep 21, 2002
1,059
0
0
75-45
hornyharry said:
I have been a loyal supporter of the Leafs for as long as I can remember. Do I agree with some of the decisions made over the years...NO...but...at the time of drafting/trading for players who here knew that these guys would or would not be stars??? Hindsight is worth a million dollars right??
I think that in Toronto's it is the years of not drafting and developing a star players that is the central issue. Hindsight has nothing to do with it! If you look at the teams that have been successful, they clearly have had good scouting which has lead to the drafting and development of the talent they have on their team.
 

Esco!

Banned
Nov 10, 2004
12,606
1
0
Toront Ho
Maybe this lockout is the best thing that can happen to the Leafs. Perhaps fans will wake up and smell the lattee. If and when the season restarts there's a chance half the people will stop showing up, if that happens they will be forced to become serious about building a winner.

I also hope that some of the southern U.S. teams disappear and I maybe they'll shorten the season.

Oh and somebody please get rid of Bettman!!!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts