another take for mypussykat
The entire thread here was a good read and given the many parameters of your original post, and the alerts brought forth by others in response, I suggest the following:
Look your client directly in the eye and tell him clearly that you are not interested in seeing him off the proverbial clock in any setting. Then assure him that IF HE PERSISTS in badgering you about socializing beyond the pay-for-play arrangement then you will cease to see him for any reason. Be firm and direct!
The plan banks on the high probability that the last thing he wants for himself is "no contact" with you and in order to preserve the ability to see you as a client he will probably curtail his invitations.
With 'most' (men) it is probable that the very natural-yet-'learned' ability to show surprising personal comfort inherent in many prostitutes is the central inspiration for this dilemma.
Men, whether they're Johns or not, shouldn't be condemned for being drawn to women who are perfectly willing to let their guard down in front of those men. That attraction is natural and perhaps it is no coincidence that non-SP's number their willing participation in intimacy as perhaps their most carefully guarded 'possession'.
If you feel that what personal information you know about him comes at all close to what he seems to know about you then maybe you needn't worry about any acts of betrayal and revenge.
You owe it to yourself to brave-up and be firm and clear.
The entire thread here was a good read and given the many parameters of your original post, and the alerts brought forth by others in response, I suggest the following:
Look your client directly in the eye and tell him clearly that you are not interested in seeing him off the proverbial clock in any setting. Then assure him that IF HE PERSISTS in badgering you about socializing beyond the pay-for-play arrangement then you will cease to see him for any reason. Be firm and direct!
The plan banks on the high probability that the last thing he wants for himself is "no contact" with you and in order to preserve the ability to see you as a client he will probably curtail his invitations.
With 'most' (men) it is probable that the very natural-yet-'learned' ability to show surprising personal comfort inherent in many prostitutes is the central inspiration for this dilemma.
Men, whether they're Johns or not, shouldn't be condemned for being drawn to women who are perfectly willing to let their guard down in front of those men. That attraction is natural and perhaps it is no coincidence that non-SP's number their willing participation in intimacy as perhaps their most carefully guarded 'possession'.
If you feel that what personal information you know about him comes at all close to what he seems to know about you then maybe you needn't worry about any acts of betrayal and revenge.
You owe it to yourself to brave-up and be firm and clear.
